experiment-results-planning
Skill0 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when designing experiments, result tables, mock planning data, evaluation protocols, or results sections before real data are final
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Norman-bury/articlewriting-skillword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Norman-bury/research-writing-skillword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- Norman-bury/research-writing-skill★ 3.4k100% same
- Norman-bury/articlewriting-skill★ 3.4k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- research-writing-assistantSkill
- brainstorming-researchSkill
- environment-setupSkill
- evidence-driven-writingSkill
- figures-diagramSkill
- figures-pythonSkill
- latex-outputSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- paper-orchestrationSkill
- peer-reviewSkill
- prompts-collectionSkill
- statistical-analysisSkill
- using-research-writingSkill
- verificationSkill
- writing-chaptersSkill
- writing-coreSkill
- writing-humanitiesSkill
- writing-lawSkill
- writing-medicalSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Before writing Results or Discussion, create:
- Very specific: line 37
Use these gates in plan/stage-gates.md for result-heavy papers:
- Distinctive: line 62
Do not let a contribution survive in Introduction if no experiment, limitation note, or future-work boundary supports it.
- Very specific: line 71
Every mock table must contain a note: PLANNING DATA - replace before submission.
- Distinctive: line 73
Do not describe mock values as "results show", "实验结果表明", or "verified".
- Distinctive: line 82
Do not create a table unless it supports a claim in the manuscript.
- Distinctive: line 90
Write or receive CSV/JSON data.
- Distinctive: line 94
Write a caption that states what the figure measures, not what the author hopes it proves.
- Distinctive: line 112
Never leave "experiment purpose", "discussion prompt", or "table position" instructions inside final chapter files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Experiment Results Planning
This skill designs the experiment/result layer before final metrics exist. It may generate mock planning data, but never presents mock data as real experimental evidence.
Hard Gate
Before writing Results or Discussion, create:
plan/experiment-protocol.mdplan/review/method-experiment-traceability.mdtables/table-schema.mdfigures/data-manifest.md- real data files or clearly labeled
mock_*files
Experiment Protocol
The protocol must include:
- Dataset and split strategy.
- Baselines and why each is fair.
- Metrics and imbalance handling.
- Main comparison.
- Efficiency evaluation.
- Ablation studies for each claimed module.
- Generalization or robustness checks.
- Explainability evaluation if XAI is a contribution.
Each contribution in Introduction must map to at least one experiment or limitation note.
Recommended Experiment Gates
Use these gates in plan/stage-gates.md for result-heavy papers:
- Gate D0: Experiment Protocol Locked
- Required: datasets, split rules, Non-IID construction, seeds, baselines, metrics, hardware/software, log schema.
- Gate D1: Method-Experiment Traceability
- Required:
plan/review/method-experiment-traceability.md. - Map each contribution to method modules, experiments, tables/figures, and allowed claims.
- Required:
- Gate D2: Table/Figure Data Contract
- Required:
tables/table-schema.md,figures/data-manifest.md, and data files.
- Required:
- Gate D3: Main/Efficiency/Ablation/Generalization/XAI Results
- Each result family needs raw logs, aggregation rule, table update, figure script, and prose update.
- Gate D4: Result Chapter Decontamination
- No "实验目的", "表位", "回填模板", "讨论提示", or planning notes in the chapter body.
- Gate D5: Peer Review Pass
- Required:
plan/review/<section>-peer-review.md.
- Required:
Method-Experiment Traceability
Create:
| Contribution | Method module | Experiment | Table/Figure | Allowed claim | Evidence status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|Do not let a contribution survive in Introduction if no experiment, limitation note, or future-work boundary supports it.
Mock Data Boundary
Mock or synthetic values are allowed only for planning figures and table layout.
Rules:
- File names must start with
mock_orsynthetic_. - Every mock table must contain a note:
PLANNING DATA - replace before submission. - Manuscript prose using mock values must keep
[待真实实验替换]. - Do not describe mock values as "results show", "实验结果表明", or "verified".
Table Schema
For each table, define:
| Table | Purpose | Rows | Metrics | Data source | Replacement owner |
Do not create a table unless it supports a claim in the manuscript.
Recommended table fields include mean ± std or confidence intervals when repeated runs are expected. Record aggregation rules in tables/table-schema.md.
Figure Handoff
Data figures must go through figures-python:
- Write or receive CSV/JSON data.
- Record it in
figures/data-manifest.md. - Generate
figures/<section>/<figure>.py. - Export PNG and SVG.
- Write a caption that states what the figure measures, not what the author hopes it proves.
Model architecture and flow diagrams use figures-diagram prompts instead of synthetic data plotting.
Results Prose Pattern
For real data:
The method achieves X under condition Y, compared with baseline Z. The improvement is mainly associated with [module], while [failure case] remains visible in [metric].For planning data:
[待真实实验替换] This paragraph will compare Table N after real experiment logs are inserted.Never leave "experiment purpose", "discussion prompt", or "table position" instructions inside final chapter files.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

