pr-review-triage
Skill3 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use for an Engram PR babysitter triage loop that monitors PR aging, CI blocks, reviewer threads, and lightweight action proposals with isolated-worktree fix candidates and human escalation for risky changes.
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Gord1y/countersign-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- aiconnai/agentshieldedited, first seen Jun 30, 2026
- EndogenAI/dogmatheir own version, first seen Mar 7, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- aiconnai/agentshield★ 2193% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- EndogenAI/dogma★ 2same name
- Gord1y/countersign-skills★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agentshield-scanSkill
- dependency-triageSkill
- engram-councilSkill
- engram-onboardingSkill
- loop-engineeringSkill
- loop-triage-ciSkill
- loop-triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill for PR queue hygiene on a weekly or 5 to 15 minute cadence.
- Distinctive: line 44
Only propose an isolated-worktree fix when all of these are true:
- Distinctive: line 57
No actionable PRs: exit report-only after updating state and run log.
- Distinctive: line 61
Do not auto-merge without an explicit allowlist.
- Distinctive: line 62
Do not resolve reviewer comments unless the verifier confirms the diff and intent.
- Distinctive: line 64
Do not edit auth, storage migrations, protocol surfaces, attestation/snapshot code, production infrastructure, secrets, release workflows, …
- Distinctive: line 67
Prefer a short comment or issue handoff over speculative code changes.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PR Babysitter Triage Loop
Use this skill for PR queue hygiene on a weekly or 5 to 15 minute cadence. The
default mode is proposal-only unless a low-risk L2 fix candidate passes the
gate. Pair it with skills/loop-engineering/SKILL.md for global loop controls.
Inputs
- Open PR list and labels.
- CI status per PR.
- Required reviewer threads and blocking comments.
- Current
pr-babysitter-state.md, history, run log, and budget file. - Current denylist and auto-merge allowlist.
Output
Append a concise triage block:
## High Priority
- PR:
Blocking condition:
Why it blocks delivery:
Exact action:
Risk level:
## Watch
## Human Escalation
## State Updates
- Attempts already made:
- Last action taken:
- Who or what is next:Execution Gate
Only propose an isolated-worktree fix when all of these are true:
- CI is red or there is a clear review block.
- Attempts are below 3.
- The issue is a single-file or small-diff candidate.
- The path is not denylisted.
- A verifier is available after the implementer.
Decision Matrix
- Low-risk minimal fix candidate: spawn
minimal-fix, thenloop-verifier. - Medium or high risk, ambiguity, or path risk: append to triage inbox and escalate to a human.
- No actionable PRs: exit report-only after updating state and run log.
Rules
- Do not auto-merge without an explicit allowlist.
- Do not resolve reviewer comments unless the verifier confirms the diff and intent.
- Do not edit auth, storage migrations, protocol surfaces, attestation/snapshot code, production infrastructure, secrets, release workflows, or MCP write tools without human approval.
- Prefer a short comment or issue handoff over speculative code changes.
Completion Gate
Mark the run complete only when every high-priority PR has a next action, risk level, owner or escalation path, and run-log entry.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

