agentleFS
aianime0012-coderaianime0012-coder/vitruvius-skills/skills/specification-writing/SKILL.md

specification-writing

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Authors and reviews CSI MasterFormat construction specifications — sections, divisions, submittals, and coordination with drawings. Use when writing spec sections, organizing a project manual, structuring Division 00-33 content, or reviewing specification accuracy and completeness.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write, structure, and review construction specifications in the CSI MasterFormat organization (and Note: AIA/APEP content practices).

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Write requirements, not descriptions: Use directive language: "Provide...", "Submit...", "Comply with...".

    line 50
  3. Distinctive:

    Review pass: check section numbers are current MasterFormat, materials match drawings, quantities/units consistent (US customary vs …

    line 52
  4. Distinctive:

    Proprietary vs. performance specs: use "equal to & approved" language or sole-source per project rules.

    line 62
  5. Distinctive:

    Don't invent manufacturer model numbers: If you can't verify a product exists, make the citation generic and flag for confirmation.

    line 64

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Specification Writing

Write, structure, and review construction specifications in the CSI MasterFormat organization (and Note: AIA/APEP content practices). Produces coordinated, accurate spec content that matches the drawings.

When to use

  • Drafting a new spec section (e.g. Division 09 finishes, Division 08 openings)
  • Setting up the project manual / spec book structure
  • Editing or checking a spec for accuracy and coordination gaps
  • Answering "what should the spec say for X?"

MasterFormat quick structure

Five-digit section numbers: Division (00–49) + 3 digits.

DivisionContent
00Procurement & contracting requirements
01General requirements (admin, submittals, quality control)
02-19Facility construction — each discipline block
22/23Plumbing / HVAC (naming differs by AIA master)
26/27/28Electrical / communications / electronic safety & security
31-33Sitework / utilities
32Exterior improvements
34-35Transportation / waterway & marine
40-49Process integration

A standard section skeleton (e.g. 09 90 00 — Paints & Coatings)

  1. Part 1 – General: Summary, References, Submittals, Quality Assurance, Delivery/Storage
  2. Part 2 – Products: Materials, Manufactured units, Finishes, Performance requirements
  3. Part 3 – Execution: Examination, Preparation, Application, Installation, Field quality control, Protection

Each paragraph uses "AUI" (Article/Uniform/Item) hierarchy: Article → Part; Paragraph → Uniform; Sub-paragraph → Item.

Writing workflow

  1. Clarify project scope — divisions needed, whether using a master (AIA, BSD, etc.), level of detail.
  2. Map to drawings — a spec must match what's drawn. For each spec section confirm: it's referenced by a drawing detail/callout, and the drawing's materials/performance match the spec.
  3. Draft sections in the skeleton: fill products first (materials/manufacturers/performance), then execution.
  4. Write requirements, not descriptions. Use directive language: "Provide...", "Submit...", "Comply with...". Avoid appealing adjectives ("high-quality", "durable") without measurable criteria.
  5. Cross-reference submittals (Division 01 §01 33 00) and related sections.
  6. Review pass: check section numbers are current MasterFormat, materials match drawings, quantities/units consistent (US customary vs metric), and that certification/inspection requirements are realistic.

Output format

Deliver spec section(s) as clean markup with the CSI three-part structure, headings numbered per section, and a brief notes column for coordination items (e.g. "verify with structural details").

Edge cases & cautions

  • Section number collisions — verify the number is unused by another discipline in the project manual.
  • Owner-provided vs. contractor-provided materials — state responsibilities explicitly.
  • Proprietary vs. performance specs: use "equal to & approved" language or sole-source per project rules; never silently convert.
  • Green building specs (LEED/v2, Title 24, red-list): include VOC/emissions + recycled content where the section applies.
  • Don't invent manufacturer model numbers. If you can't verify a product exists, make the citation generic and flag for confirmation.
  • Reference standards are best as named norms with year (e.g. "ASTM C1036-19"), not vague "per manufacturer".

Files

  • references/masterformat-2020-divisions.md — full Division 00-49 index with common sections per division.
  • references/spec-guidelines.md — writing rules, AUI hierarchy, submittal/QA guidance, and editing checklist.
  • assets/section-skeleton.md — blank section template.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.