literature-research
Skill16 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Search academic literature and perform deep research reviews. Use when user asks to search PubMed, find academic papers, or do literature reviews.
- Reads credentials
7 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- samuhs/mad-sciencetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- gigio1023/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- gigio1023/gigio-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- nalada16/my_MLIntern_claude_skilltheir own version, first seen Jun 25, 2026
- phuongdo/claude-skillsedited, first seen Feb 17, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- nickjwells/skills-workspace★ 2889% same
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skills★ 089% same
- phuongdo/claude-skills★ 089% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- nalada16/my_MLIntern_claude_skill★ 7same name
- gigio1023/agent-skills★ 2same name
- gigio1023/gigio-skills★ 2same name
- samuhs/mad-science★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- add-webhookSkill
- aws-production-deploySkill
- build-in-public-youtubeSkill
- casualize-namesSkill
- classify-leadsSkill
- create-proposalSkill
- cross-niche-outliersSkill
- design-websiteSkill
- euron-qaSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- excalidraw-visualsSkill
- generate-reportSkill
- ghost-browserSkill
- gmail-inboxSkill
- gmail-labelSkill
- gmaps-leadsSkill
- image-to-videoSkill
- instantly-autoreplySkill
- instantly-campaignsSkill
- linkedin-carousel-handwrittenSkill
- local-serverSkill
- mac-controlSkill
- modal-deploySkill
- Nano Banana 2 Image Generation MasterSkill
- onboarding-kickoffSkill
- pan-3d-transitionSkill
- recreate-thumbnailsSkill
- scrape-leadsSkill
- send-telegramSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- skool-monitorSkill
- skool-ragSkill
- thumbnail-generatorSkill
- title-variantsSkill
- upwork-applySkill
- video-editSkill
- welcome-emailSkill
- whisper-voiceSkill
- youtube-outliersSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Search academic databases and perform comprehensive literature reviews.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Literature Research
Goal
Search academic databases and perform comprehensive literature reviews.
Scripts
./scripts/pubmed_literature_search.py- Search PubMed./scripts/literature_deep_review.py- Deep review with Claude
Usage
Search PubMed
python3 ./scripts/pubmed_literature_search.py \
--query "machine learning cancer diagnosis" \
--limit 50 \
--output .tmp/papers.jsonDeep Review
python3 ./scripts/literature_deep_review.py \
--input .tmp/papers.json \
--output .tmp/review.mdOutput
- JSON file with paper metadata
- Markdown review with key findings, themes, gaps
Schema
Inputs
| Name | Type | Required | Description |
query | string | Yes | Research query (e.g., 'machine learning cancer diagnosis') |
limit | integer | No | Max papers to fetch (default: 50) |
Outputs
| Name | Type | Description |
papers_file | file_path | JSON file with paper metadata |
review_file | file_path | Markdown review with key findings, themes, gaps |
Credentials
| Name | Source |
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | .env |
Cost
Free (PubMed API) + Claude for review
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.