Multi-Environment Delivery and Release Standard

A reusable template for repos that route deployments through GitHub Actions and authenticate to Vault via OIDC. Replace the placeholder workflow/role names below with the target repo's actual ones; keep the routing shape and secret-handling rules.

For AI Workspace Infra, read AI Workspace Infra Repository Map first. Treat the checked-in workflow plus its external scripts as execution truth; reconcile conflicting README prose rather than routing a deployment from documentation alone.

按变更类别选择发布方式

按实际变更及其持久状态影响分类，不以仓库名称、改动行数或“补丁版本”代替判断。发布计划列出类别、SQL schema/数据格式影响、固定构件、发布单元、验收及恢复路径；一项发布涉及多类变更时采用其中最严格的规则。

DB 规则同样覆盖 Vault Raft 及其他持久卷工作负载的版本或状态格式转换：使用新集群和独立存储，通过审查后的迁移、恢复或明确重初始化路径验证。快照、兼容性声明、仅新增字段或可执行 down migration 均不构成业务有状态原地升级的例外。

独立监控服务是明确例外：在不承载业务/账单状态、不参与业务记账且不共用其持久存储的情况下，可按自身发布单元原地升级；保留监控健康、采集/查询回归及其数据的备份恢复证据。该例外不扩展到业务数据库、SQL schema 或账单链路。

每个发布单元独立固定版本及调谐范围，可继续共用 Git 仓库；更新某个 UI/API/监控单元不能连带升级 DB、Vault 或其他有状态单元。分类只决定发布方式，不自动授权部署、迁移或切换。DB/有状态替换使用代际升级验收，数据保护遵循备份与迁移规范。

1. Environment Routing Rules

Delivery modes: default and reviewed feature lanes

The Git-event routing below remains the compatibility default. An explicitly reviewed feature-lane profile may instead run SIT then frozen-candidate UAT before merging application PRs; use feature-lane-release-workflow. Adoption must declare trusted triggers, approval, exact workflow/ref/OIDC bindings, target tuple and non-production secret scope together. No PR receives production credentials, and stable production gates remain unchanged. Until the profile is implemented and verified, use the existing routing; this text does not activate an exception at runtime.

For cross-generation database reconciliation, also follow Target-side generation reconciliation. This applies to manual SSH/Playbooks/GitOps delivery as well as pipelines.

For fresh source-to-target generation replacement and repeatable pre-cutover acceptance, use Generation upgrade acceptance. It defines stages 0–7 and links the operations-owned restore/regression contract; do not treat a successful migration or build as authorization to cut traffic.

A single delivery workflow (e.g. <delivery-workflow>.yaml) should route traffic to specific environments based on Git events. For the default profile, enforce these bounds:

• pull_request -> routes to sit environment.
• main or release/* push -> routes to uat environment.
• vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH tag -> routes to prod environment.

For platform-ops-toolkit/platform-ops.yaml, preserve the mapped resource file, workspace, backend key, domain base, and Vault role as one atomic profile. Changing only one of them can make Terraform manage one host while Ansible deploys another.

1.0 GitOps declaration and promotion contract

• The desired-state file is selected by the explicit tuple resources/<project>/<env>/<provider>/*.yaml; workflow inputs, Terraform workspaces, backend keys, Vault roles, CMDB output, and deployment targets MUST resolve to that same tuple before credentials are read.
• A UAT promotion MUST validate the exact GitOps commit and immutable artifact first, then promote that same commit/artifact identity to PROD through a PR or protected release action. Do not rebuild from main, silently rewrite image tags, or infer a production path from a missing environment value.
• Rollback keeps the previous GitOps commit, state snapshot, artifact digest, and environment-specific Vault references available until the observation window closes. A rollback in one environment does not mutate another environment's declaration or state.

For Kubernetes services delivered through Flux and Helm, use Kubernetes progressive delivery to define chart and image pins, ingress ownership, traffic and metric gates, promotion order, and rollback evidence. Apply the same environment promotion rules to these releases.

1.1 Cross-repository snapshot and deployment boundary

An immutable cross-repository snapshot is a build/release candidate, not an implicit deployment request. Keep these stages separate:

1. Resolve the requested source ref to a SHA in every participating repository.
2. Create immutable snapshot tags through the approved short-lived automation identity.
3. Trigger and verify repository-local builds using the exact tag and SHA.
4. Select a snapshot only after all required artifacts and manifests pass.
5. Pass the selected tag explicitly to the environment deployment workflow.

Never use main, latest, or a partially successful snapshot as a deployment version. Failed retries retain their tags and use a new -rN suffix. The snapshot summary must preserve the workflow URL, per-repository SHA/build status, artifact evidence, and any retry reason.

1.1.1 Daily build asset resolution and resilient client provisioning

Client and edge-node provisioning scripts (such as setup-proxy.sh) that consume daily builds must not assume rigid, unversioned asset filenames:

1. Dynamic Asset Discovery: Query the GitHub Releases API or release asset list to match hashed bundles (e.g. artifact-${goarch}-<hash>.tar.gz) or latest daily build tags.
2. Two-Tier Download Fallback: If the composite tarball is missing, incomplete, or corrupted, automatically fall back to downloading standalone individual binaries before failing.
3. Legacy Binary & Service Migration: When binary names evolve (e.g., agent-svc-plus -> xconnect-edge-agent), installation logic must:
   • Gracefully stop and disable prior legacy systemd units (agent-proxy, agent-svc-plus).
   • Create backward-compatible symlinks in /usr/local/bin/.
   • Ensure permissions and certificates are seamlessly adopted without requiring host reboot.

1.2 Universal Zero-Production-Fallback Rule (零生产兜底原则)

• Default 绝不包含生产端点与资源：在所有源代码、编译/构建模板、配置管理脚本（Ansible defaults/vars）、容器编排清单（Docker Compose / Kubernetes / Helm）及服务默认配置文件中，绝对禁止将生产环境的域名、IP、数据库 DSN、密钥或服务端点作为兜底退回值（default/fallback）。
• 非生产环境强隔离（Non-Production Isolation）：Dev、Test、SIT、UAT 等非生产环境在任何缺省或参数未传状态下，严禁静默退回并连通生产资源或生产依赖服务。
• Safe Fallbacks or Fail-Fast：当必填服务地址、端点或依赖凭证未显示提供时，配置解析引擎必须严格遵循以下三种安全模式之一：
  1. Safe Local Fallback：仅退回至完全隔离且无公网风险的本地 Mock / Loopback 地址（如 http://127.0.0.1:<port> 或 http://localhost:<port>）；
  2. Dynamic Host/Environment Derivation：根据当前运行环境上下文或请求 Host 头强类型派生同环境同级子域名/服务名；
  3. Fail-Fast：在应用启动阶段或配置加载初始化阶段立即抛出异常或断言失败，禁止隐式降级运行。

1.3 Build-Time Artifact vs. Runtime Resolution Precedence (构建期产物与运行期决议优先级)

• 构建产物环境无关性（Immutable Environment-Agnostic Artifacts）：任何编译打包产物（包括 Docker 镜像、二进制包、前端静态编译Bundle）必须保持环境无关。禁止在镜像构建阶段将特定环境的真实 upstream 端点硬编码写死至打包产物中。
• 运行期配置决议优先（Runtime Precedence）：应用服务在运行时解析依赖端点与参数时，运行期动态配置（如环境变量注入、外部挂载的动态配置文件、服务发现）必须具备最高优先级，强制覆盖构建期打入的静态默认退回值。

1.4 End-to-End Orchestration Parameter Propagation (声明式编排全链路透传)

• 编排层显式透传：容器编排文件（Compose / K8s Manifests）必须显式声明关键依赖服务 URL 的环境变量映射，确保宿主机或配置中心注入的环境配置能无损传递至应用程序容器。
• 配置管理模板动态派生：配置管理系统（Ansible / Helm）渲染环境配置文件或秘密文件时，依赖服务的地址必须由当前环境的核心域名/网络变量动态派生，禁止跨角色写死字面值。

1.5 Production ref allowlist and tag semantics

Production eligibility is a hard allowlist, not a naming convention. A production-capable workflow MUST fail closed unless github.ref matches one of:

• refs/tags/vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (the immutable stable release tag); or
• refs/heads/release/vMAJOR.MINOR (the protected release line, only when an explicit production action and approval are also present).

main, feature/bugfix branches, pull-request refs, arbitrary dispatch refs, and all daily-build-* / uat-daily-build-* snapshots are non-production inputs. A workflow may use a release branch to validate or stage a release, but it MUST NOT infer production promotion from a branch name alone.

Stable and daily artifacts MAY share one tagging script. The shared tagging script MUST require or derive an explicit tag kind and validate the complete tag/ref/environment matrix before creating anything:

Published stable tags MUST never be moved, overwritten, force-updated, or deleted. A failed stable release gets a new version; a failed daily attempt gets a new -rN snapshot suffix. The preflight MUST verify the event, ref, source SHA, tag immutability, artifact matrix, artifact digest/provenance, GitOps desired version, Vault role/KV path, target route, and required test conclusions before any production credential is read or deployment mutation starts.

1.5.1 UAT to PROD Promotion Execution Contract

When promoting an immutable build from UAT to PROD via daily-main-snapshot.yaml:

1. Source Reference Validation: snapshot_source_ref must explicitly point to an existing, verified non-production snapshot tag (uat-daily-build-YYYY.MM.DD-rN or daily-build-YYYY.MM.DD-rN). Direct promotion from moving main is strictly prohibited.
2. Target Release Tag: snapshot_tag must be a valid, immutable SemVer or calendar-versioned release tag (vYYYY.MM.DD[-rN] or vX.Y.Z).
3. Preflight Cross-Org Matrix: All participating repositories in daily-snapshot-builds.json must have their container images or release binaries built and verified for that exact tag.
4. Backend-First Deployment Gating: Downstream orchestrators (serverless-orchestrator.yml) must gate the frontend Cloudflare deployment on a 100% successful Cloud Run backend rollout. Never publish frontend assets against a failed or partial backend.

1.6 跨仓库类型发版矩阵与多阶段交付契约 (Multi-Repo Release & Rollback Matrix)

各仓库根据架构特性与运行载体不同，具有严格区分的发版语义与部署途径：

关键约束守则：

1. 防生产误触铁律：accounts 和 portal 的 v* 标签是生产发布触发器，日常演进、UAT 验证与 Hotfix 过程中严禁打任何 v* 标签。
2. 两阶段验证铁律：客户端/Daemon 发版必须遵循 打 Tag -> Actions 产出 Release 资产 -> xconnect-one-uat.yaml (dry-run) -> xconnect-one-uat.yaml (apply) -> 观测 30 分钟。
3. 禁止节点就地热修：严禁 SSH 登录 UAT 机器直接修改二进制文件；任何变更必须有 Git 提交、PR 评审、发布 Tag 和 CI 构建产物。

1.7 Post-deploy public-site review-readiness check

A deploy that touches the brand domain's edge routing, SSR public/content boundaries or Pages MUST run the review-readiness post-check from store-and-startup-homepage-spec §9 before it is reported successful, in every environment (SIT/UAT/Prod):

• public pages return 200 in place on the brand host (no 3xx), the homepage shows the legal name, /contact and /support expose only the company-domain mailbox, robots.txt/sitemap.xml are valid;
• a Cloudflare challenge seen from the runner is a warning (datacenter IPs), not a pass or a fail, unless strict mode is set;
• ordering: ship the application change that makes a page pass BEFORE merging a check that requires it, otherwise the pipeline blocks itself.

Implemented by scripts/serverless_uat/verify_brand_site_review_readiness.sh in platform-ops-toolkit.

2. Vault Authentication & Secrets

• DO NOT store sensitive credentials in GitHub Actions Secrets.
• Authentication must use GitHub OIDC → Vault JWT.
• Environments are strictly isolated. Ensure you select the correct Vault role for the context, following a naming convention like github-actions-<repo>-sit / -uat / -prod.

2.1 Hardening the JWT role binding

A JWT role is only as strong as its bound_claims. Binding on repository alone is not isolation — it lets any branch, any workflow, and any contributor with push access mint that role's token. Bind on repository plus a trigger-scope claim:

{
  "role_type": "jwt",
  "user_claim": "sub",
  "bound_audiences": ["vault"],
  "bound_claims_type": "string",
  "bound_claims": {
    "repository": "<org>/<repo>",
    "job_workflow_ref": "<org>/<repo>/.github/workflows/<delivery>.yaml@refs/heads/main",
    "environment": "prod"
  },
  "token_policies": ["github-actions-<repo>-prod"],
  "token_no_default_policy": true,
  "token_type": "batch",
  "token_ttl": "20m",
  "token_max_ttl": "20m"
}

• user_claim: use sub (stable, encodes repo + ref + workflow). Avoid actor — it keys the Vault identity to a human username rather than the workload.
• bound_claims_type: default to string (exact match). Use glob only where a wildcard is genuinely required — a * matches / too, so refs/heads/release/* is satisfiable by any branch a repo writer can create.
• job_workflow_ref: pin it. Without it, a newly added or modified workflow file in the same repo can assume the role.
• Prefer the environment claim over ref for prod. A ref-based binding inherits the strength of branch protection; a GitHub Environment with required reviewers gates the token behind an approval.
• Token limits: short token_ttl + token_max_ttl (a CI job needs minutes, not hours), token_no_default_policy: true, and token_type: batch for non-renewable CI tokens.

2.2 KV path layout: three tiers

Per-environment isolation is defeated if every role can read one shared path holding cloud API keys, Terraform state credentials, or a global SSH private key. The loosest role defines the effective privilege of the whole system: if the sit role is bindable from any branch and can read that path, anyone who can push a branch owns the infrastructure.

Split the KV tree by whether a secret has an environment dimension at all:

Classification test — ask in order, first yes wins:

1. Does it grant infrastructure control or host login? → ②. This is the actual vehicle for escalation: a sit compromise must not yield prod's cloud account or host private key.
2. Does its value change per environment? → yes ③, no ①.
3. Otherwise ③. Default to isolated; sharing needs an argument for why one copy across three environments is correct — not merely that there happens to be one copy today.

Permissions:

• Tiers ① and ② are read-only for every role. Pipelines consume credentials; they do not rotate them. A shared asset must not be writable by any single environment's pipeline.
• prod must not hold delete on kv/data/<env>/*, and especially not on kv/metadata/<env>/* — metadata delete permanently destroys every version of a secret.

Why ① and ② can coexist under one prefix: in KV v2, kv/data/<shared> and kv/data/<shared>/<env> are separate secrets — a path can be both a secret and a prefix. A policy path of kv/data/<shared> matches the root exactly and does not match subpaths (that needs kv/data/<shared>/*). So "shared root + only your own subpath" holds strictly.

Enforce it, don't just document it. These are assertions, not conventions — verify them in CI:

• no policy names another environment's kv/data/<shared>/<other-env>;
• no policy uses the kv/data/<shared>/* wildcard — that single glob collapses tier ② in one step, and it is the premise the whole layout rests on;
• tiers ① and ② carry no create/update/delete/patch/sudo;
• prod carries no delete on either kv/data or kv/metadata.

Path isolation is not credential isolation. Copying one credential set into three per-environment paths isolates the paths while the credentials stay shared — a sit compromise still yields prod. The structure is a precondition; the security benefit only lands once each environment holds genuinely distinct keys. Say which of the two you have actually achieved.

2.3 No escape hatches, no drift

• Never accept a Vault token as a workflow_dispatch input. Dispatch inputs are stored unmasked in run metadata and bypass every binding above. A "fallback for when JWT breaks" is a standing credential-injection path — fix the JWT instead.
• Verify the role the workflow requests actually exists and its binding matches the triggering ref. A workflow that maps tag pushes to a role bound to refs/heads/* fails auth at best, and silently routes to the wrong environment at worst. Keep the routing table (§1), the VAULT_ROLE expression, and the role definitions reviewed together — they drift independently.
• Allowlist new Vault workflows deliberately. platform-ops-toolkit manages roles through docs/tasks/vault_auth_split.sh. Adding a workflow that calls Vault requires adding that exact workflow filename to job_workflow_ref, merging the configuration change, and having an authorized operator apply it. Do not widen the claim to an unrestricted wildcard.
• Do not make an optional secret mandatory. A DNS token belongs in a DNS-cutover-only Vault read. A resize or health-check path that does not switch DNS must not fail because Cloudflare credentials are absent.

3. Branching Lifecycle

• Always use Pull Requests. Do not push directly to main or release/*.
• feature/* and bugfix/* MUST target main.
• hotfix/* MUST target release/*.
• Production deployments ONLY occur via annotated stable tags (v*). Stable tags are immutable release identities: never move, overwrite, or delete them after publication.
• Preserve main and release/* permanently. Protect them with required reviews/checks and prohibit force-push, ref replacement, and deletion; normal reviewed commits remain allowed.

3.1 Release and build reference retention

• Treat every tag matching v* as a stable release tag and retain it permanently, including date-based and legacy version forms. Apply repository tag protection or a ruleset so only the release automation identity can create such tags and nobody can update or delete them.
• Retain all build/environment tags created within the configurable recent window RECENT_RETENTION_DAYS (default: 7 calendar days). This includes prefixes such as daily-build-*, uat-daily-build-*, sit-*, and equivalent repository-specific environment tags.
• Retain at least one deployable rollback tag per environment and service even when it is older than seven days; record the exception and its owner.
• Treat older non-stable build/environment tags as cleanup candidates only after verifying that no deployment workflow, Vault/CMDB record, release note, rollback plan, or open PR references them.
• Publish release notes or update the repository changelog with the stable tag's scope, target commit, artifact identity, deployment environments, verification evidence, and rollback reference. Do not rebuild from a moving branch after tagging.

4. Emergency Secret Leaks

If a secret is exposed in the repository:

1. Revoke immediately in Vault/Provider.
2. Generate a new credential.
3. Purge the Git history (e.g. using git filter-repo)—do not merely "delete" the file in a new commit.

5. Documentation cites Vault KV path + key name, never the value

A real incident: an account database export, an SMTP password, and an OAuth token manual all ended up committed as literal values in markdown/YAML — live MFA TOTP secrets included — sitting in a public repository's history for months before a gitleaks gate caught them. Regenerating credentials fixed the accounts; the git history purge is the part that doesn't fix itself and needs git filter-repo (§4) plus a force-push everyone with a clone must re-pull.

• Documentation, runbooks, and example configs cite kv/<path> <KEY_NAME> — never the secret's actual value. A setup guide that shows a real SMTP password or a real API key is itself a leak, indistinguishable in git history from one that was never meant to be read. Write password: "{{ vault kv/CICD SMTP_PASSWORD }}" or the equivalent for the pipeline in question, not the string it resolves to.
• This includes "just an example" or "sanitized" values that are actually real. The account export above was checked in as ops documentation, not intentionally as a secret — that distinction doesn't survive a git clone.
• Data exports containing secrets (account dumps, API responses, debug captures) do not belong in the repository at all, sanitized or not — they belong in the artifact/backup path that already exists for that purpose (§4 of the IaC spec's Vault-push pattern), not in docs/.
• gitleaks failing on a PR that didn't introduce the secret is not a false positive to suppress. It scans full history; a red Sec QA Gate on an unrelated PR means a prior commit leaked something and the fix is the purge above, not an allowlist entry.

6.1 UAT release closeout and recovery

For a multi-repository UAT release, completion is a controlled sequence, not a single workflow result:

1. Merge each participating repository through a PR targeting main. Confirm the merge commit and required checks; do not tag a feature branch or a local worktree that was not merged.
2. Create one immutable, cross-repository snapshot tag (for example, uat-daily-build-YYYY.MM.DD-rN) from the resolved main SHAs. The first snapshot for a UTC date is r1; retries and later same-day snapshots use the next available rN. A failed attempt keeps its tag; retry with the next suffix rather than moving or reusing it.
3. Verify the image/package build for every deployable repository by exact tag and commit SHA. A repository tag, a successful tag matrix, or a successful workflow dispatch is not by itself proof that the artifact exists.
4. Update the UAT GitOps desired state through a PR. Pull-only CD means the deployment workflow must never write image tags into GitOps; it may validate the requested tag against the committed .env.<env> or equivalent.
5. Wait for the pull-only CD/reconciliation and verify the rendered image tag, service health, and migration status on the exact UAT hosts. Do not use production domains, DNS records, credentials, or database endpoints as a fallback during UAT validation.
6. Validate data flow at each boundary. For a usage path, verify exporter collection, Vector fan-out, authenticated Billing ingest, shared PostgreSQL write, Accounts read, and Portal display separately. Validate Grafana's remote-write path separately; missing Grafana data must not be “fixed” by coupling it to billing.
7. Record the tag, PRs, merge SHAs, GitOps PR/commit, workflow URLs, target environment, DNS result, service status, schema/migration result, and checkpoint results in docs/tasks/ or the consuming repository's equivalent.

If any checkpoint is unknown, pending, or only inferred from a downstream UI, the release remains incomplete. Use the evidence table in ci-cd-workflow-spec to classify the fault before changing code or data.

6.2 DNS and authenticated cross-node ingress

• DNS creation/update is a separately auditable operation. Verify authoritative and public resolver answers before relying on an HTTPS endpoint; an old local resolver answer is not evidence that DNS is wrong.
• Cross-node ingest endpoints MUST use the same environment-scoped service authentication contract as peer internal services, plus network restriction where appropriate. Keep the application Bearer check independent from the Caddy/ingress route so a permitted network source still cannot write without the token.
• UAT checks MUST use redacted requests and never print the token. Test both expected success and expected unauthorized/forbidden behavior, without weakening production ingress or modifying production Xray configuration.