web-analytics-observability
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Verify analytics, observability, and launch monitoring for websites and apps. Use for analytics installation, event naming, conversion funnels, Core Web Vitals tracking, error tracking, session replay with consent, bot protection, uptime checks, dashboards, alerting, privacy-safe telemetry, and confirming that tracking actually fires in production. Not for diagnosing or fixing the Core Web Vitals it reports (use $web-performance-audit), DNS, SSL, cache, or the post-deploy smoke test (use $web-deployment-ops), whether a consent notice and privacy policy are legally adequate (use $web-legal-compliance), or abuse controls on model endpoints (use $web-ai-integration) — this gate owns only the measurement layer, whether telemetry is installed, actually fires, and alerts someone.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- web-accessibility-auditSkill
- web-ai-integrationSkill
- web-brand-assetsSkill
- web-build-coachSkill
- web-content-qualitySkill
- web-core-flow-testingSkill
- web-data-resilienceSkill
- web-deployment-opsSkill
- web-design-directorSkill
- web-email-launchSkill
- web-launch-qaSkill
- web-legal-complianceSkill
- web-motion-polishSkill
- web-payments-launchSkill
- web-performance-auditSkill
- web-security-reviewSkill
- web-seo-findabilitySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.