web-research
Skill7 starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Conduct comprehensive web research on a question and produce a cited report. Use when the user asks to "research", "investigate", "do a deep dive", "compare X vs Y", "find out about", or wants a thorough, multi-source answer with citations rather than a single quick lookup. Runs the search/read/synthesize loop in a background task so fetched pages stay out of the main conversation; returns a saved report. Reuses the built-in web_search + web_fetch tools (keyless by default; better with provider keys).
45 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- thensls/nsls-builder-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- memi-design/design-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGItheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Bobagi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- oleg494/coding-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use data-analysis, meeting-notes and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
shanggqmSkilldata-analysis
数据分析技能,提供结构化的数据查询、统计分析和报告生成工作流。当用户需要查询数据库、进行数据统计分析、生成分析报告时使用。按规范输出原始数据、计算结果、Markdown报告和HTML可视化报告。
Also in 5 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillmeeting-notes
>
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillweb-search
Also in 5 projects that use this
kongyo2Skillprompt-engineering
Comprehensive prompt engineering framework for designing, optimizing, and iterating LLM prompts. This skill should be used when users request prompt creation, optimization, or improvement for any LLM task, or when users need help translating vague requirements into effective prompts through collaborative dialogue and iterative refinement.
Also in 4 projects that use this
rogue-dev-studioSkillbrowser-automation
Canonical browser automation and web UI verification: Playwright, agent browser CLIs, and CDP-based tooling in one playbook.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillbrand-guidelines
Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions45 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 45
- langchain-ai/deepagents★ 31ksame name
- pollinations/pollinations★ 5.3ksame name
- langchain-ai/deepagentsjs★ 1.6ksame name
- alfredxw/denova★ 990same name
- icey1287/SuperMew★ 884same name
- cohen-liel/hivemind★ 108same name
- grandamenium/cortextos★ 106same name
- WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI★ 100same name
- jezweb/vite-flare-starter★ 49same name
- dewil/ai-toolkit★ 9same name
35 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
If the question in $ARGUMENTS is empty or vague, ask the user for a clear research question (and scope/time-frame) before proceeding.
- Very specific: line 33
When the task completes, read the report with internal__read_report and give the user a short summary plus the report name.
- Very specific: line 65
Use __save_to_file on internal__web_fetch for very large pages so they don't bloat even the background task's context.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Web Research
Produce a thorough, cited answer to a research question by searching the web, reading the best sources, and synthesizing a report — with the heavy reading done in a background task so the main conversation stays clean.
Question to research: $ARGUMENTS
How to run it
- If the question in
$ARGUMENTSis empty or vague, ask the user for a clear research question (and scope/time-frame) before proceeding. - Pick a short kebab-case report name from the topic, e.g.
research-<topic>. - Delegate the work to a background task with
internal__run_backgroundso the many fetched pages never enter this conversation's context. Pass:description:"Web research: <topic>"save_to_report: the report name from step 2max_time_seconds:600(research is multi-step)prompt: the research brief below, with$ARGUMENTSfilled in.
- Tell the user the research is running in the background, name the report it will write, and that they'll be notified when it completes. Do not start fetching pages yourself in this conversation.
- When the task completes, read the report with
internal__read_reportand give the user a short summary plus the report name. If they want more, point them at the full report.
If background tasks are unavailable (e.g. non-interactive mode), run the research brief below inline instead, then save the result with
internal__write_report.
Research brief (the background prompt)
You are researching: $ARGUMENTS
- Use
internal__web_searchto find sources. Start broad, then run 2–4 refined queries covering sub-questions and alternative phrasings. Prefer primary and authoritative sources.- Use
internal__web_fetchto read the full content of the ~5–8 most relevant results (not just snippets). For pages that fail to fetch, try another source.- Cross-check claims across at least two independent sources. Note where sources disagree, and flag anything you could not verify.
- Synthesize a structured markdown report:
- Summary — the direct answer in a few sentences.
- Findings — organized by sub-topic, with inline citations like
[1].- Caveats / open questions — gaps, disagreements, recency limits.
- Sources — numbered list of
[n] Title — URLfor every citation used.- Ground every non-obvious claim in a citation. Do not invent URLs or facts; if the web results don't answer part of the question, say so explicitly.
- Save the finished report (this happens automatically via
save_to_report).
Notes
- Works with no API keys (DuckDuckGo search + built-in HTTP fetch). Relevance and anti-bot coverage improve automatically when Tavily / Brave / Firecrawl keys are set — this skill is provider-agnostic.
- Use
__save_to_fileoninternal__web_fetchfor very large pages so they don't bloat even the background task's context.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

