rust-testing
Skill0 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology. Use when writing Rust tests — unit, integration, async, property-based, or coverage.
- Installs packages
29 other projects use a version of this, 17 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- damacus/agent-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Blushyes/reefedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jniltinho/macos-kvm-guiword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use rust-async-patterns and rust-best-practices.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
klauswgSkillrust-async-patterns
Master Rust async programming with Tokio, async traits, error handling, and concurrent patterns. Use when building async Rust applications, implementing concurrent systems, or debugging async code.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrust-best-practices
Guide for writing idiomatic Rust code based on Apollo GraphQL's best practices handbook. Use this skill when: (1) writing new Rust code or functions, (2) reviewing or refactoring existing Rust code, (3) deciding between borrowing vs cloning or ownership patterns, (4) implementing error handling with Result types, (5) optimizing Rust code for performance, (6) writing tests or documentation for Rust projects.
Also in 7 projects that use this
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 8100% same
- damacus/agent-skills★ 2100% same
- idexal/idexal-skills★ 2100% same
- jniltinho/macos-kvm-gui★ 1100% same
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 1100% same
- prdlk/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 17
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272100% same
- Blushyes/reef★ 84100% same
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 61100% same
- Bitslix/BLXCode★ 15100% same
- aphrody-code/bxc★ 2100% same
- ronmkr/PromptBook★ 2100% same
- carvalhosauro/open-loops★ 1100% same
- junimnjw/everything-claude-code★ 170% same
- Rojios/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1100% same
7 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- huiali/rust-skills★ 47same name
- full-stack-skills/rust-skills★ 8same name
- adxptived/Rust-Skills★ 1same name
- owenlamont/skills★ 1same name
- Baba01hacker666/dummyskills★ 0same name
- Dankosik/rust-cli-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-architecture-auditSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-harness-constructionSkill
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-security-hardeningSkill
- agent-self-evaluationSkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- prompt-optimizerSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- database-migrationsSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- fastapi-patternsSkill
- postgres-patternsSkill
- redis-patternsSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- design-systemSkill
- frontend-patternsSkill
- react-performanceSkill
- docker-patternsSkill
- golang-testingSkill
- kubernetes-patternsSkill
- python-testingSkill
- react-testingSkill
- content-engineSkill
- market-researchSkill
- seoSkill
- api-designSkill
- brownfield-retrospectiveSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- conventional-commit-reviewSkill
- orch-pipelineSkill
- plan-orchestrateSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- unified-memorySkill
- verification-loopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 459
Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Very specific: line 460
Use #[cfg(test)] modules for unit tests
- Common: line 461
Test behavior, not implementation
- Common: line 462
Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
- Very specific: line 463
Prefer assert_eq! over assert!
- Very specific: line 464
Use ? in tests that return Result for cleaner error output
- Common: line 465
Keep tests independent — no shared mutable state
- Very specific: line 468
Use #[should_panic] when you can test Result::is_err() instead
- Very specific: line 471
Use sleep() in tests — use channels, barriers, or tokio::time::pause()
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rust Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Rust testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.
When to Use
- Writing new Rust functions, methods, or traits
- Adding test coverage to existing code
- Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
- Implementing property-based tests for input validation
- Following TDD workflow in Rust projects
How It Works
- Identify target code — Find the function, trait, or module to test
- Write a test — Use
#[test]in a#[cfg(test)]module, rstest for parameterized tests, or proptest for property-based tests - Mock dependencies — Use mockall to isolate the unit under test
- Run tests (RED) — Verify the test fails with the expected error
- Implement (GREEN) — Write minimal code to pass
- Refactor — Improve while keeping tests green
- Check coverage — Use cargo-llvm-cov, target 80%+
TDD Workflow for Rust
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Write a failing test first
GREEN → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT → Continue with next requirementStep-by-Step TDD in Rust
// RED: Write test first, use todo!() as placeholder
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { todo!() }
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_add() { assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5); }
}
// cargo test → panics at 'not yet implemented'// GREEN: Replace todo!() with minimal implementation
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { a + b }
// cargo test → PASS, then REFACTOR while keeping tests greenUnit Tests
Module-Level Test Organization
// src/user.rs
pub struct User {
pub name: String,
pub email: String,
}
impl User {
pub fn new(name: impl Into<String>, email: impl Into<String>) -> Result<Self, String> {
let email = email.into();
if !email.contains('@') {
return Err(format!("invalid email: {email}"));
}
Ok(Self { name: name.into(), email })
}
pub fn display_name(&self) -> &str {
&self.name
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn creates_user_with_valid_email() {
let user = User::new("Alice", "alice@example.com").unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "Alice");
assert_eq!(user.email, "alice@example.com");
}
#[test]
fn rejects_invalid_email() {
let result = User::new("Bob", "not-an-email");
assert!(result.is_err());
assert!(result.unwrap_err().contains("invalid email"));
}
}Assertion Macros
assert_eq!(2 + 2, 4); // Equality
assert_ne!(2 + 2, 5); // Inequality
assert!(vec![1, 2, 3].contains(&2)); // Boolean
assert_eq!(value, 42, "expected 42 but got {value}"); // Custom message
assert!((0.1_f64 + 0.2 - 0.3).abs() < f64::EPSILON); // Float comparisonError and Panic Testing
Testing Result Returns
#[test]
fn parse_returns_error_for_invalid_input() {
let result = parse_config("}{invalid");
assert!(result.is_err());
// Assert specific error variant
let err = result.unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, ConfigError::ParseError(_)));
}
#[test]
fn parse_succeeds_for_valid_input() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let config = parse_config(r#"{"port": 8080}"#)?;
assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
Ok(()) // Test fails if any ? returns Err
}Testing Panics
#[test]
#[should_panic]
fn panics_on_empty_input() {
process(&[]);
}
#[test]
#[should_panic(expected = "index out of bounds")]
fn panics_with_specific_message() {
let v: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _ = v[0];
}Integration Tests
File Structure
my_crate/
├── src/
│ └── lib.rs
├── tests/ # Integration tests
│ ├── api_test.rs # Each file is a separate test binary
│ ├── db_test.rs
│ └── common/ # Shared test utilities
│ └── mod.rsWriting Integration Tests
// tests/api_test.rs
use my_crate::{App, Config};
#[test]
fn full_request_lifecycle() {
let config = Config::test_default();
let app = App::new(config);
let response = app.handle_request("/health");
assert_eq!(response.status, 200);
assert_eq!(response.body, "OK");
}Async Tests
With Tokio
#[tokio::test]
async fn fetches_data_successfully() {
let client = TestClient::new().await;
let result = client.get("/data").await;
assert!(result.is_ok());
assert_eq!(result.unwrap().items.len(), 3);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn handles_timeout() {
use std::time::Duration;
let result = tokio::time::timeout(
Duration::from_millis(100),
slow_operation(),
).await;
assert!(result.is_err(), "should have timed out");
}Test Organization Patterns
Parameterized Tests with rstest
use rstest::{rstest, fixture};
#[rstest]
#[case("hello", 5)]
#[case("", 0)]
#[case("rust", 4)]
fn test_string_length(#[case] input: &str, #[case] expected: usize) {
assert_eq!(input.len(), expected);
}
// Fixtures
#[fixture]
fn test_db() -> TestDb {
TestDb::new_in_memory()
}
#[rstest]
fn test_insert(test_db: TestDb) {
test_db.insert("key", "value");
assert_eq!(test_db.get("key"), Some("value".into()));
}Test Helpers
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
/// Creates a test user with sensible defaults.
fn make_user(name: &str) -> User {
User::new(name, &format!("{name}@test.com")).unwrap()
}
#[test]
fn user_display() {
let user = make_user("alice");
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "alice");
}
}Property-Based Testing with proptest
Basic Property Tests
use proptest::prelude::*;
proptest! {
#[test]
fn encode_decode_roundtrip(input in ".*") {
let encoded = encode(&input);
let decoded = decode(&encoded).unwrap();
assert_eq!(input, decoded);
}
#[test]
fn sort_preserves_length(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
let original_len = vec.len();
vec.sort();
assert_eq!(vec.len(), original_len);
}
#[test]
fn sort_produces_ordered_output(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
vec.sort();
for window in vec.windows(2) {
assert!(window[0] <= window[1]);
}
}
}Custom Strategies
use proptest::prelude::*;
fn valid_email() -> impl Strategy<Value = String> {
("[a-z]{1,10}", "[a-z]{1,5}")
.prop_map(|(user, domain)| format!("{user}@{domain}.com"))
}
proptest! {
#[test]
fn accepts_valid_emails(email in valid_email()) {
assert!(User::new("Test", &email).is_ok());
}
}Mocking with mockall
Trait-Based Mocking
use mockall::{automock, predicate::eq};
#[automock]
trait UserRepository {
fn find_by_id(&self, id: u64) -> Option<User>;
fn save(&self, user: &User) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_user_when_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.with(eq(42))
.times(1)
.returning(|_| Some(User { id: 42, name: "Alice".into() }));
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
let user = service.get_user(42).unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.name, "Alice");
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_none_when_not_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.returning(|_| None);
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
assert!(service.get_user(99).is_none());
}Doc Tests
Executable Documentation
/// Adds two numbers together.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// use my_crate::add;
///
/// assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5);
/// assert_eq!(add(-1, 1), 0);
/// ```
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
a + b
}
/// Parses a config string.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err` if the input is not valid TOML.
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// let config = parse_config(r#"port = 8080"#).unwrap();
/// assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
/// ```
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// assert!(parse_config("}{invalid").is_err());
/// ```
pub fn parse_config(input: &str) -> Result<Config, ParseError> {
todo!()
}Benchmarking with Criterion
# Cargo.toml
[dev-dependencies]
criterion = { version = "0.5", features = ["html_reports"] }
[[bench]]
name = "benchmark"
harness = false// benches/benchmark.rs
use criterion::{black_box, criterion_group, criterion_main, Criterion};
fn fibonacci(n: u64) -> u64 {
match n {
0 | 1 => n,
_ => fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2),
}
}
fn bench_fibonacci(c: &mut Criterion) {
c.bench_function("fib 20", |b| b.iter(|| fibonacci(black_box(20))));
}
criterion_group!(benches, bench_fibonacci);
criterion_main!(benches);Test Coverage
Running Coverage
# Install: cargo install cargo-llvm-cov (or use taiki-e/install-action in CI)
cargo llvm-cov # Summary
cargo llvm-cov --html # HTML report
cargo llvm-cov --lcov > lcov.info # LCOV format for CI
cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80 # Fail if below thresholdCoverage Targets
| Code Type | Target |
| Critical business logic | 100% |
| Public API | 90%+ |
| General code | 80%+ |
| Generated / FFI bindings | Exclude |
Testing Commands
cargo test # Run all tests
cargo test -- --nocapture # Show println output
cargo test test_name # Run tests matching pattern
cargo test --lib # Unit tests only
cargo test --test api_test # Integration tests only
cargo test --doc # Doc tests only
cargo test --no-fail-fast # Don't stop on first failure
cargo test -- --ignored # Run ignored testsBest Practices
DO:
- Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Use
#[cfg(test)]modules for unit tests - Test behavior, not implementation
- Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
- Prefer
assert_eq!overassert!for better error messages - Use
?in tests that returnResultfor cleaner error output - Keep tests independent — no shared mutable state
DON'T:
- Use
#[should_panic]when you can testResult::is_err()instead - Mock everything — prefer integration tests when feasible
- Ignore flaky tests — fix or quarantine them
- Use
sleep()in tests — use channels, barriers, ortokio::time::pause() - Skip error path testing
CI Integration
# GitHub Actions
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
with:
components: clippy, rustfmt
- name: Check formatting
run: cargo fmt --check
- name: Clippy
run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings
- name: Run tests
run: cargo test
- uses: taiki-e/install-action@cargo-llvm-cov
- name: Coverage
run: cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80Remember: Tests are documentation. They show how your code is meant to be used. Write them clearly and keep them up to date.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

