liquidity-analysis
Skill366 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
DEX liquidity depth assessment, slippage estimation, and pool composition analysis for Solana tokens
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 90
Use Jupiter quotes at multiple sizes to build an empirical slippage curve.
- Distinctive: line 306
token-holder-analysis: Check LP token holder distribution before entering.
- Distinctive: line 310
slippage-modeling: Use the empirical slippage curves from this skill as input to execution cost models.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Liquidity Analysis — DEX Depth Assessment for Solana Tokens
Liquidity analysis answers three critical questions before every trade: Can I get in at a reasonable price? Can I get out when I need to? and Is this pool safe? Without it, you risk excessive slippage, failed exits, and rug pulls.
Why Liquidity Analysis Matters
Position sizing: Maximum position size is bounded by available liquidity. A $10K position in a pool with $20K TVL will move the price significantly. Rule of thumb: keep trade size under 2% of pool depth to limit slippage below 1%.
Execution cost: Slippage is a direct cost. On a 5 SOL buy, the difference between 0.3% and 3% slippage is real money lost on every entry and exit.
Rug risk detection: Thin liquidity, single pools, unlocked LP tokens, and newly created pools are warning signs. Liquidity analysis catches these before you enter.
Exit planning: Entry liquidity may differ from exit liquidity. If LP is unlocked and owned by one wallet, it can be pulled at any time.
Key Concepts
Total Value Locked (TVL)
Total value of assets deposited in a pool. For a SOL/TOKEN pool with 100 SOL and 1M TOKEN at $0.01 each, TVL = 100 * SOL_price + 1M * $0.01. TVL alone is insufficient — you need depth at the current price range.
Liquidity Depth
How much can be traded before moving the price X%. In constant-product AMMs, depth is uniform. In concentrated liquidity (CLMM), depth varies by price range — thick near the current price, thin or zero outside active ranges.
Concentration Factor (CLMM)
Concentrated liquidity pools focus capital in a narrow price range, providing deeper liquidity within that range but nothing outside it. A pool with $50K TVL concentrated in a +/-5% range provides the same depth as a $500K constant-product pool within that range, but zero depth beyond it.
Slippage Curve
Slippage is not linear. Plotting slippage against trade size produces a curve that's gentle for small trades and steep for large ones. The shape depends on pool type, TVL, and concentration.
Pool Composition
Who provides liquidity matters. Locked LP tokens cannot be withdrawn (safer). Single-sided liquidity means the pool is imbalanced. Pool age indicates stability — pools older than 7 days with consistent TVL are more reliable.
Data Sources
Four complementary data sources, from free to comprehensive:
| Source | Auth Required | Best For | Limitations |
| DexScreener | None | Quick pool lookup, liquidity.usd | No on-chain pool details |
| Jupiter Quote API | None | Empirical slippage at any size | Aggregate across pools |
| Birdeye | API key | Detailed pool data, trade history | Rate limited on free tier |
| On-chain | RPC only | LP lock status, exact reserves | Requires program knowledge |
See references/data_sources.md for complete endpoint documentation and usage examples.
Core Analysis Pipeline
Step 1: Identify Pools
Fetch all pools for a token. Most Solana tokens have multiple pools across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora.
import httpx
def get_pools(mint: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Fetch all DEX pools for a token from DexScreener."""
resp = httpx.get(f"https://api.dexscreener.com/tokens/v1/solana/{mint}")
resp.raise_for_status()
pairs = resp.json()
return [p for p in pairs if p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) > 0]Step 2: Measure Depth
For each pool, extract liquidity metrics:
def extract_depth(pool: dict) -> dict:
"""Extract liquidity metrics from a DexScreener pool."""
return {
"dex": pool.get("dexId", "unknown"),
"liquidity_usd": pool.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0),
"volume_24h": pool.get("volume", {}).get("h24", 0),
"pool_age_hours": _pool_age_hours(pool.get("pairCreatedAt", 0)),
"pair_address": pool.get("pairAddress", ""),
}Step 3: Estimate Slippage
Use Jupiter quotes at multiple sizes to build an empirical slippage curve. This captures real routing across all pools:
import httpx
SOL_MINT = "So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112"
LAMPORTS = 1_000_000_000
async def estimate_slippage(token_mint: str, sol_amounts: list[float]) -> list[dict]:
"""Query Jupiter for slippage at multiple trade sizes.
Args:
token_mint: Token mint address to buy.
sol_amounts: List of SOL amounts to test (e.g., [0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10]).
Returns:
List of dicts with sol_amount, output_tokens, price_per_token, slippage_bps.
"""
results = []
base_price = None
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
for sol in sol_amounts:
lamports = int(sol * LAMPORTS)
resp = await client.get(
"https://api.jup.ag/quote/v1",
params={
"inputMint": SOL_MINT,
"outputMint": token_mint,
"amount": str(lamports),
"slippageBps": 5000,
},
)
if resp.status_code != 200:
continue
data = resp.json()
out_amount = int(data["outAmount"])
price = sol / out_amount if out_amount > 0 else 0
if base_price is None:
base_price = price
slippage_bps = int((price - base_price) / base_price * 10000) if base_price > 0 else 0
results.append({
"sol_amount": sol,
"output_tokens": out_amount,
"price_per_token": price,
"slippage_bps": max(0, slippage_bps),
})
return resultsStep 4: Assess Concentration
For CLMM pools (Orca Whirlpool, Raydium CLMM, Meteora DLMM), liquidity may be concentrated in a narrow range. Check if the current price is within the active range and how deep liquidity extends:
def assess_concentration(pools: list[dict]) -> dict:
"""Assess concentration risk from pool data."""
clmm_pools = [p for p in pools if p.get("dexId") in ("raydium", "orca") and "clmm" in p.get("labels", [])]
cpmm_pools = [p for p in pools if p not in clmm_pools]
total_clmm = sum(p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in clmm_pools)
total_cpmm = sum(p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in cpmm_pools)
total = total_clmm + total_cpmm
return {
"clmm_ratio": total_clmm / total if total > 0 else 0,
"cpmm_liquidity": total_cpmm,
"clmm_liquidity": total_clmm,
"concentration_risk": "high" if total_clmm / total > 0.8 and total > 0 else "low",
}Step 5: Compute Liquidity Score
Composite score from 0 (dangerous) to 100 (deep, safe liquidity):
def compute_liquidity_score(
total_liquidity_usd: float,
pool_count: int,
largest_pool_pct: float,
oldest_pool_hours: float,
max_slippage_bps_at_1sol: int,
) -> int:
"""Compute composite liquidity score (0-100).
Components:
Depth (40%): log-scaled TVL from $1K (0) to $1M+ (40)
Diversity (15%): more pools = more resilient
Concentration (15%): penalty if one pool dominates
Age (15%): older pools are more reliable
Slippage (15%): lower slippage = better
"""
import math
# Depth: 0-40 points
depth = min(40, int(40 * math.log10(max(total_liquidity_usd, 1)) / 6))
# Diversity: 0-15 points
diversity = min(15, pool_count * 3)
# Concentration: 0-15 points (penalty for single-pool dominance)
concentration = int(15 * (1 - largest_pool_pct))
# Age: 0-15 points (7+ days = full marks)
age = min(15, int(15 * oldest_pool_hours / 168))
# Slippage: 0-15 points
slippage = max(0, 15 - max_slippage_bps_at_1sol // 10)
return max(0, min(100, depth + diversity + concentration + age + slippage))Risk Flags
Flag these conditions before entering any position:
| Flag | Condition | Risk Level |
| Single Pool | Only 1 DEX pool exists | High |
| Thin Liquidity | Total TVL < $10,000 | Critical |
| New Pool | Pool created < 2 hours ago | High |
| Unlocked LP | LP tokens not burned/locked | Medium |
| Volume Mismatch | Volume >> TVL (wash trading) | Medium |
| Price Deviation | >5% price difference across pools | High |
| Concentrated CLMM | >80% liquidity in CLMM with narrow range | Medium |
def detect_risk_flags(pools: list[dict]) -> list[str]:
"""Detect liquidity risk flags from pool data."""
flags = []
if len(pools) < 2:
flags.append("SINGLE_POOL: Only 1 pool exists — exit may be difficult")
total_liq = sum(p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in pools)
if total_liq < 10_000:
flags.append(f"THIN_LIQUIDITY: Total TVL ${total_liq:,.0f} < $10,000")
for p in pools:
age_ms = p.get("pairCreatedAt", 0)
if age_ms > 0:
import time
age_hours = (time.time() * 1000 - age_ms) / 3_600_000
if age_hours < 2:
flags.append(f"NEW_POOL: {p.get('dexId')} pool is {age_hours:.1f}h old")
volumes = [p.get("volume", {}).get("h24", 0) for p in pools]
liqs = [p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in pools]
for v, l, p in zip(volumes, liqs, pools):
if l > 0 and v / l > 10:
flags.append(f"VOLUME_MISMATCH: {p.get('dexId')} volume/TVL = {v/l:.1f}x")
prices = [float(p.get("priceUsd", 0)) for p in pools if float(p.get("priceUsd", 0)) > 0]
if len(prices) >= 2:
deviation = (max(prices) - min(prices)) / min(prices)
if deviation > 0.05:
flags.append(f"PRICE_DEVIATION: {deviation:.1%} across pools")
return flagsPosition Sizing from Liquidity
Maximum position size should keep slippage under your threshold:
| Trade Type | Max Slippage | Max Position % of TVL |
| Scalp | 0.5% (50 bps) | 1% |
| Swing | 2% (200 bps) | 2-5% |
| Position | 5% (500 bps) | 5-10% |
def max_position_from_liquidity(
total_liquidity_usd: float,
max_slippage_pct: float = 1.0,
trade_type: str = "swing",
) -> float:
"""Estimate maximum position size in USD based on liquidity.
Uses rule-of-thumb: max_position = tvl_fraction * total_liquidity.
For constant-product AMM, 1% of TVL produces ~2% slippage.
Args:
total_liquidity_usd: Total liquidity across all pools.
max_slippage_pct: Maximum acceptable slippage percentage.
trade_type: "scalp", "swing", or "position".
Returns:
Maximum position size in USD.
"""
fractions = {"scalp": 0.01, "swing": 0.03, "position": 0.07}
base_fraction = fractions.get(trade_type, 0.03)
adjusted = base_fraction * (max_slippage_pct / 2.0)
return total_liquidity_usd * adjustedSlippage Estimation
For detailed slippage mathematics including constant-product formulas, CLMM models, and empirical curve fitting, see references/slippage_curves.md.
Key formula for constant-product AMM:
slippage = Δx / (x + Δx)Where Δx is trade size and x is pool reserve of the input token. For a 1 SOL trade on a pool with 100 SOL reserve, slippage = 1/101 = 0.99%.
Pool Types
Solana DEXes use different AMM designs with different liquidity characteristics. See references/pool_types.md for comprehensive coverage including:
- Constant Product (Raydium V4, Orca Legacy): Uniform liquidity, predictable slippage
- Concentrated Liquidity (Raydium CLMM, Orca Whirlpool): Deep at current price, zero outside range
- Dynamic AMM (Meteora DLMM): Adaptive fees, bin-based liquidity
Integration with Other Skills
token-holder-analysis: Check LP token holder distribution before entering. If one wallet holds >50% of LP tokens and they are unlocked, exit risk is high.
position-sizing: Feed max_position_from_liquidity() output into position sizing models as an upper bound.
slippage-modeling: Use the empirical slippage curves from this skill as input to execution cost models.
birdeye-api: Fetch detailed pool data including trade history and LP events.
dexscreener-api: Free pool discovery and basic liquidity metrics.
Example Workflow
# Full liquidity assessment for a token
import httpx
TOKEN = "DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263" # BONK
# 1. Get pools
resp = httpx.get(f"https://api.dexscreener.com/tokens/v1/solana/{TOKEN}")
pools = [p for p in resp.json() if p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) > 0]
# 2. Analyze
total_liq = sum(p["liquidity"]["usd"] for p in pools)
largest = max(p["liquidity"]["usd"] for p in pools)
largest_pct = largest / total_liq if total_liq > 0 else 1.0
# 3. Risk flags
flags = detect_risk_flags(pools)
# 4. Score
score = compute_liquidity_score(total_liq, len(pools), largest_pct, 1000, 50)
# 5. Position sizing
max_pos = max_position_from_liquidity(total_liq, max_slippage_pct=1.0, trade_type="swing")
print(f"Total Liquidity: ${total_liq:,.0f}")
print(f"Pools: {len(pools)}")
print(f"Score: {score}/100")
print(f"Max Position (swing, 1% slip): ${max_pos:,.0f}")
for f in flags:
print(f" WARNING: {f}")Files
| File | Description |
references/slippage_curves.md | Slippage math for constant-product and CLMM pools, empirical curve fitting |
references/pool_types.md | AMM designs on Solana: constant product, concentrated, dynamic |
references/data_sources.md | API endpoints and on-chain methods for fetching liquidity data |
scripts/analyze_liquidity.py | Full liquidity assessment with scoring and risk flags |
scripts/pool_comparison.py | Compare pools across DEXes for a token |
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- IngAs8/ClaudeSkill★ 0100% same
- Serennity007/claude-trading-skills-67★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- backtraderSkill
- birdeye-apiSkill
- coingecko-apiSkill
- cointegration-analysisSkill
- copy-tradingSkill
- correlation-analysisSkill
- cost-basis-engineSkill
- crypto-tax-exportSkill
- custom-indicatorsSkill
- defillama-apiSkill
- dex-executionSkill
- dex-pool-analysisSkill
- dexscreener-apiSkill
- exit-strategiesSkill
- feature-engineeringSkill
- fixed-incomeSkill
- helius-apiSkill
- impermanent-lossSkill
- jito-bundlesSkill
- kalshi-apiSkill
- kalshi-crypto-index-marketsSkill
- kalshi-weather-marketsSkill
- kelly-criterionSkill
- lp-mathSkill
- market-microstructureSkill
- market-microstructure-traditionalSkill
- mean-reversionSkill
- mev-analysisSkill
- ohlcv-processingSkill
- options-pricingSkill
- pandas-taSkill
- polymarket-apiSkill
- portfolio-analyticsSkill
- position-sizingSkill
- prediction-market-live-opsSkill
- prediction-market-strategySkill
- pumpfun-mechanicsSkill
- raptor-dexSkill
- regime-detectionSkill
- regulatory-reportingSkill
- risk-managementSkill
- rl-executionSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- shredstreamSkill
- signal-classificationSkill
- slippage-modelingSkill
- solana-rpcSkill
- solanatracker-apiSkill
- solana-tx-buildingSkill
- strategy-frameworkSkill
- sybil-detectionSkill
- ta-libSkill
- tax-liability-trackingSkill
- tax-loss-harvestingSkill
- token-economicsSkill
- token-holder-analysisSkill
- trade-accountingSkill
- trade-journalSkill
- trading-visualizationSkill
- vectorbtSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

