specify
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Initialize and manage requirements specifications with component-type instructions.
29 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Buddhilive/buddhi-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- jantichy/claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- totalfrank/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- danielcherubini/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use discovery, discover and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
robzolkosSkilldiscovery
Quick user-centric interview to capture requirements from a time-poor stakeholder.
Also in 3 projects that use this
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinit
Also in 5 projects that use this
MetaSkillroadmap
Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sahinSkillexecute
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillvalidate
Run the full CI validation workflow locally before submitting a PR. Use this as a final check to ensure all Azure DevOps CI pipeline steps will pass.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 29
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- team-attention/hoyeon★ 173same name
- ArvorCo/Relentless★ 98same name
- jantichy/claude★ 45same name
- mehrad-dm/mastermind★ 23same name
- agent-ix/quoin★ 20same name
- danielcherubini/skills★ 14same name
- stormlightlabs/thunderus★ 4same name
19 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- spec-app-reviewSkill
- spec-blueprintSkill
- spec-dependency-analysisSkill
- spec-evidence-analysisSkill
- spec-failure-domain-analysisSkill
- spec-integrity-analysisSkill
- spec-matrixSkill
- spec-object-reviewSkill
- spec-reviewSkill
- spec-risk-complexity-analysisSkill
- spec-scope-boundary-analysisSkill
- spec-security-analysisSkill
- spec-to-planSkill
- spec-us-to-frSkill
- spec-write-frSkill
- spec-write-itSkill
- spec-write-nfrSkill
- spec-write-strSkill
- spec-write-usSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Create the spec.md and manage the requirements lifecycle.
- Distinctive: line 22
Create typed FRs for entities, events, state machines, processes.
- Distinctive: line 23
Create architecture FRs for API endpoints, queues, schemas, UI components.
- Distinctive: line 24
Create operational FRs for configuration, migrations.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Requirements Specification
Create the spec.md and manage the requirements lifecycle.
Workflow
- Initialize: Create
spec.mdfromassets/spec-template.md. - Capture Requirements:
spec-write-str: Stakeholder needs.spec-write-us: User stories.
- Specify Behavior:
spec-us-to-fr: Derive FRs from stories.spec-write-fr: System behavior.spec-write-nfr: Quality constraints.
- Define Domain Model:
- Identify domain objects from master spec § 8-9.
- Create typed FRs for entities, events, state machines, processes.
- Create architecture FRs for API endpoints, queues, schemas, UI components.
- Create operational FRs for configuration, migrations.
- See
spec-write-frobject-type-guide.md.
- Verify Coverage:
spec-matrix: Test matrix.
- Review (required):
spec-review: Validate quality.
Process
- Check prerequisites:
- Single Repo:
spec/ - Multi-Repo:
specs/<category>/<component>/spec/
- Single Repo:
- Copy template:
assets/spec-template.md - Set frontmatter:
artifact_type: Must bemaster-requirements.name: Component name matching the repo.org: Organization owning the component.component_type: Authoritative type (e.g.,fastapi-service,react-lib).tags: Optional capabilities (e.g.,[postgres, sqlmodel]).relationships: Structured array of relationship objects (target, type, cardinality). Do NOT usedepends_on. Specify exact semantic linkages such ascalls,implements,publishes,consumes,reads,writes,triggers, orrequires.
[!IMPORTANT] Individual artifacts (FR, NFR, StR, US, IT) also require YAML frontmatter with
id,title, andtype. See each writing skill's Frontmatter section.
- Customize: Processes, states, diagrams.
- Apply component instructions from
golden-path/components/<component-type>/agent-instructions.md.
Repository Structure
spec/
├── spec.md # Master specification
├── stakeholder/ # StR-XXX
├── usecase/ # US-XXX
├── functional/ # FR-XXX (behavioral + domain-typed)
├── non-functional/ # NFR-XXX
├── tests.md # Test Matrix
└── assets/ # Diagrams, POCsID Schema
- Stakeholder:
StR-XXX - User Story:
US-XXX - Functional:
FR-XXX - Non-Functional:
NFR-XXX - Test Case:
TC-XXX
Application-Type Specifications
[!IMPORTANT] When
component_type: application, useassets/app-spec-template.mdinstead ofassets/spec-template.md. The application spec standard is fundamentally different from a service or library spec.
What the Application Spec Owns
An application spec describes how multiple component repositories compose into a coherent system. It owns only cross-service concerns — things that cannot be expressed within any single component's spec.
| Section | What to Write |
| Architecture Rationale (ADRs) | Why this architecture? Why these trade-offs? One ADR entry per major decision that shaped the system shape. |
| Cross-service Sequence Diagrams | End-to-end flows that span >1 service (Login, Checkout, Deploy). No single service can own these. |
| System-level NFRs | SLA/uptime, scale limits, RTO/RPO — targets for the composed system, not individual services. |
| External Consumer Contract | How does an integrating engineer use this application as a whole? Aggregate "quickstart" across components. |
| Scope Boundaries | What the system explicitly does NOT do. Deliberate exclusions, not future work. |
| Security Model | Actor roles, trust hierarchy, capability matrix. Cross-cutting — not owned by any single service. |
| Deployment Topology | Namespace layout, ingress routes, service discovery, shared secrets/config. |
| Observability Strategy | Dashboard names, alert policies for the system. Per-service metrics stay in service specs. |
What Stays at Service Level
- Per-endpoint API contracts (routes, schemas)
- Database schema and data models
- Per-service latency/throughput NFRs
- Events and signals (defined at service or domain level — never pulled to app level)
- Per-service error codes and test matrix
- Environment variables beyond shared/cross-service ones
Required Functional Requirements
For component_type: application, every spec MUST include:
| FR Object Type | Purpose | Example |
domain | Bounded context, ER diagram, subdomain map | FR-001 Auth Domain |
process | One FR per major cross-service workflow | FR-002 Login Process |
configuration | Shared config across multiple services | FR-006 Auth Configuration |
integration | External consumer contract (how to integrate) | FR-007 Consumer Integration Contract |
Required Non-Functional Requirements
| NFR | Purpose |
| Security Constraints | Cryptography, transport, error handling standards |
| System Reliability | Uptime SLA, p99 latency, scale limits, RTO/RPO |
| Deployment Topology | Namespace, ingress, service discovery, secret mounts |
Reference Implementation
Refer to a known well-formed application spec in your org as a model when authoring a new one.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

