setup
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Configure which review agents run for your project. Auto-detects stack and writes compound-engineering.local.md.
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hydra-db/hydradb-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- WALKERKILLER/Look-Tongji-Notestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- steerlabs/opensteertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- anombyte93/prd-taskmastertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use add-voice-transcription, add-discord and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
juancruzmunozalbeloSkilladd-voice-transcription
Add voice message transcription to NanoClaw using OpenAI's Whisper API. Automatically transcribes WhatsApp voice notes so the agent can read and respond to them.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilladd-discord
Add Discord bot channel integration via Chat SDK.
Also in 11 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilladd-slack
Add Slack channel integration via Chat SDK.
Also in 11 projects that use this
juancruzmunozalbeloSkilladd-telegram-swarm
Add Agent Swarm (Teams) support to Telegram. Each subagent gets its own bot identity in the group. Requires Telegram channel to be set up first (use /add-telegram). Triggers on "agent swarm", "agent teams telegram", "telegram swarm", "bot pool".
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +8 more from microsoft
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- gavrielc/nanoclaw★ 31ksame name
- nanocoai/nanoclaw★ 31ksame name
- qwibitai/nanoclaw★ 31ksame name
- Q00/ouroboros★ 6.3ksame name
- pytorch/executorch★ 5.2ksame name
- agenticnotetaking/arscontexta★ 3.5ksame name
- aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws★ 3.4ksame name
- spotify/portal-ai-plugins★ 2.8ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- compound-engineeringSkill
- compound-engineeringSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- agent-native-architectureSkill
- agent-native-auditSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- cavemanSkill
- compound-docsSkill
- compound-engineeringSkill
- compounding-operating-systemSkill
- compound-refreshSkill
- create-agent-skillsSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- file-todosSkill
- finishing-branchSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gemini-imagegenSkill
- git-worktreeSkill
- grill-meSkill
- ideateSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- laravel-conventionsSkill
- orchestrating-swarmsSkill
- rcloneSkill
- resolve-pr-parallelSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- ubiquitous-languageSkill
- xml-tag-structureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Read compound-engineering.local.md in the project root.
- Distinctive: line 36
If "View current": read and display the file, then stop.
- Distinctive: line 133
Only show options that differ from the detected type.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Compound Engineering Setup
Interactive setup for compound-engineering.local.md -- configures which agents run during /workflows:review and /workflows:work, plus the visible Ralph/TDD defaults that planning and execution inherit.
Step 1: Check Existing Config
Read compound-engineering.local.md in the project root. If it exists, display current settings summary (including the TDD contract) and use AskUserQuestion:
question: "Settings file already exists. What would you like to do?"
header: "Config"
options:
- label: "Reconfigure"
description: "Run the interactive setup again from scratch"
- label: "View current"
description: "Show the file contents, then stop"
- label: "Cancel"
description: "Keep current settings"If "View current": read and display the file, then stop. If "Cancel": stop.
Step 2: Detect and Ask
Auto-detect the project stack by checking for common project indicators:
# Detect project stack from root files
if [ -f "artisan" ] && [ -f "composer.json" ]; then
echo "laravel"
elif [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
echo "rust"
elif [ -f "nest-cli.json" ] || grep -q '"@nestjs/core"' package.json 2>/dev/null; then
echo "nestjs"
elif [ -f "nuxt.config.ts" ] || [ -f "nuxt.config.js" ]; then
echo "nuxt"
elif [ -f "next.config.ts" ] || [ -f "next.config.js" ] || [ -f "next.config.mjs" ]; then
echo "nextjs"
elif [ -f "angular.json" ]; then
echo "angular"
elif [ -f "vite.config.ts" ] && grep -q '"vue"' package.json 2>/dev/null; then
echo "vue"
elif [ -f "vite.config.ts" ] && grep -q '"react"' package.json 2>/dev/null; then
echo "react"
elif [ -f "composer.json" ]; then
echo "php"
elif [ -f "tsconfig.json" ]; then
echo "typescript"
elif [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "javascript"
elif [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || [ -f "requirements.txt" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
echo "python"
elif [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "go"
else
echo "general"
fiUse AskUserQuestion:
question: "Detected {type} project. How would you like to configure?"
header: "Setup"
options:
- label: "Auto-configure (Recommended)"
description: "Use smart defaults for {type}. Done in one click."
- label: "Customize"
description: "Choose stack, focus areas, and review depth."If Auto-configure -> Skip stack/focus/depth and continue with Step 3d and Step 3e using these defaults:
- Laravel:
[laravel-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - PHP:
[laravel-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - Vue/Nuxt:
[vue-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - React/Next.js:
[typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - Angular:
[typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - NestJS:
[nestjs-reviewer, typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - TypeScript:
[typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - JavaScript:
[typescript-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - Python:
[python-reviewer, code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle] - Rust:
[code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle, architecture-strategist] - Go:
[code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle, architecture-strategist] - General:
[code-simplicity-reviewer, security-sentinel, performance-oracle, architecture-strategist]
If Customize -> Step 3 (all questions)
Step 3: Configure Details
a. Stack -- confirm or override:
question: "Which stack should we optimize for?"
header: "Stack"
options:
- label: "{detected_type} (Recommended)"
description: "Auto-detected from project files"
- label: "Laravel"
description: "Laravel PHP -- adds Laravel convention reviewer"
- label: "Vue/Nuxt"
description: "Vue.js / Nuxt -- adds frontend reviewer"
- label: "React/Next.js"
description: "React / Next.js -- adds TypeScript reviewer"
- label: "Angular"
description: "Angular -- adds TypeScript reviewer"
- label: "NestJS"
description: "NestJS -- adds NestJS and TypeScript reviewers"
- label: "Python"
description: "Python -- adds Pythonic pattern reviewer"
- label: "Rust"
description: "Rust -- adds architecture reviewer"
- label: "Go"
description: "Go -- adds architecture reviewer"Only show options that differ from the detected type.
b. Focus areas -- multiSelect:
question: "Which review areas matter most?"
header: "Focus"
multiSelect: true
options:
- label: "Security"
description: "Vulnerability scanning, auth, input validation (security-sentinel)"
- label: "Performance"
description: "N+1 queries, memory leaks, complexity (performance-oracle)"
- label: "Architecture"
description: "Design patterns, SOLID, separation of concerns (architecture-strategist)"
- label: "Code simplicity"
description: "Over-engineering, YAGNI violations (code-simplicity-reviewer)"c. Depth:
question: "How thorough should reviews be?"
header: "Depth"
options:
- label: "Thorough (Recommended)"
description: "Stack reviewers + all selected focus agents."
- label: "Fast"
description: "Stack reviewers + code simplicity only. Less context, quicker."
- label: "Comprehensive"
description: "All above + git history, data integrity, agent-native checks."d. Delivery loop:
question: "What should the default delivery loop be for this repo?"
header: "TDD"
options:
- label: "Ralph-driven TDD (Recommended)"
description: "Failing tests first, minimal implementation second, refactor third, rerun until green and clean. Plans default to unit + e2e evidence unless they record a justified exception."
- label: "Standard implementation"
description: "Implementation can lead. Plans may still opt into Ralph explicitly, but any weaker test evidence should be recorded in the plan."e. Review mode:
question: "When should reviews run during /workflows:work?"
header: "Review mode"
options:
- label: "Bulk (Default)"
description: "Review runs once at the end of all tasks. Faster, less interruption."
- label: "Inline"
description: "Review runs after each task. Slower, but catches issues earlier."
- label: "Both"
description: "Inline review per task AND bulk review at the end."Step 4: Build Agent List and Write File
Stack-specific agents:
- Laravel/PHP ->
laravel-reviewer - Vue/Nuxt ->
vue-reviewer - React/Next.js/Angular/TypeScript/JavaScript ->
typescript-reviewer - NestJS ->
nestjs-reviewer, typescript-reviewer - Python ->
python-reviewer - Rust/Go/General -> (none)
Focus area agents:
- Security ->
security-sentinel - Performance ->
performance-oracle - Architecture ->
architecture-strategist - Code simplicity ->
code-simplicity-reviewer
Depth:
- Thorough: stack + selected focus areas
- Fast: stack +
code-simplicity-revieweronly - Comprehensive: all above +
git-history-analyzer, data-integrity-guardian, agent-native-reviewer
Plan review agents: stack-specific reviewer + code-simplicity-reviewer.
Execution settings:
tdd_enabled: compatibility mirror for current execution templates.truewhentdd.modeisralph, otherwisefalse.tdd.precedence:plan_overrides_local(any concrete plantddvalue beats this file;inheritfalls back here)tdd.mode:ralphorstandardtdd.loop:red-green-refactororimplementation-firsttdd.evidence.unit:requiredoroptionaltdd.evidence.e2e:requiredoroptionaltdd.exceptions:[]by default. Plans must carry any justified exceptions.review_mode: "bulk" (default), "inline", or "both" (controls per-task review in workflows:work)
Write compound-engineering.local.md:
---
review_agents: [{computed agent list}]
plan_review_agents: [{computed plan agent list}]
tdd_enabled: {true|false}
tdd:
precedence: plan_overrides_local
mode: {ralph|standard}
loop: {red-green-refactor|implementation-first}
evidence:
unit: {required|optional}
e2e: {required|optional}
exceptions: []
review_mode: bulk
---
# Review Context
Add project-specific review instructions here.
These notes are passed to all review agents during /workflows:review and /workflows:work.
## TDD Defaults
- `tdd` is the visible repo-local default contract for planning and execution.
- Plan-level `tdd` values override this file for that plan; `inherit` falls back to these defaults.
- `tdd_enabled` mirrors whether `tdd.mode` is `ralph` until execution templates read the full `tdd` block directly.
Examples:
- "We use Turbo Frames heavily -- check for frame-busting issues"
- "Our API is public -- extra scrutiny on input validation"
- "Performance-critical: we serve 10k req/s on this endpoint"Step 5: Confirm
Saved to compound-engineering.local.md
Stack: {type}
Review depth: {depth}
Agents: {count} configured
{agent list, one per line}
TDD default: {ralph|standard}
Loop: {red-green-refactor|implementation-first}
Evidence: unit={required|optional}, e2e={required|optional}
Precedence: plan `tdd` values override local defaults when set
Tip: Edit the "Review Context" section to add project-specific instructions.
Re-run this setup anytime to reconfigure review agents or TDD defaults.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

