stop
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Request a pause for explicit human approval before proceeding. Use as a checkpoint before irreversible operations like deploy, delete, publish, or any action with production impact.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- leinardi/adversarial-review-looptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- heikki-laitala/stick-aroundtheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- ewebdzine/claude-code-time-trackertheir own version, first seen Jul 26, 2026
- jankocian/cc-voice-controltheir own version, first seen Jun 24, 2026
- gstredny/ClaudeCodeWorkflowtheir own version, first seen May 6, 2026
- tjg37/ironclawtheir own version, first seen Apr 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use status.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- kennethleungty/claude-music★ 23same name
- leinardi/adversarial-review-loop★ 2same name
- gstredny/ClaudeCodeWorkflow★ 1same name
- heikki-laitala/stick-around★ 1same name
- tjg37/ironclaw★ 1same name
- ewebdzine/claude-code-time-tracker★ 0same name
- jankocian/cc-voice-control★ 0same name
- Jonely235/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 48
Treat any non-approval response as a modification request.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
stop — Checkpoint Skill
Execution Steps
- Summarize what has been accomplished so far in the current workflow.
- State clearly what action comes NEXT if execution continues.
- State the reason for this checkpoint (if provided).
- Show the checkpoint block:
══════════════════════════════════════════
⏸ CHECKPOINT
══════════════════════════════════════════
Completed:
✓ [list what's done]
Next action if you approve:
→ [exact next step, be specific]
Reason for checkpoint:
[reason, or "manual checkpoint in workflow"]
To review before approving:
- [specific files, diffs, or outputs to check]
══════════════════════════════════════════
Reply "approved", "go", or "proceed" to continue.
Reply anything else to modify the plan.
══════════════════════════════════════════- Request that execution not proceed until the user explicitly approves.
- Treat any non-approval response as a modification request.
IMPORTANT: This skill places a checkpoint INSTRUCTION in the prompt. It does not technically enforce a halt. For guaranteed gating of irreversible actions, configure the agent runtime's tool-permission system to require approval for the relevant tools.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

