agentleFS
adriaalcalaadriaalcala/claude-code-setup/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md

skill-creator

Skill0 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design, build, and iterate on Claude OS skills using a structured evaluation framework. Create production-ready skills that combine metadata, logic, and test coverage.

189 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, mermaid-diagram-generator and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AtomicBot-aiSkill

    taskflow-inbox-triage

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • shalombSkill

    mermaid-diagram-generator

    Guide on creating and editing Mermaid charts safely. Use when asked to draw a diagram, flowchart, or architecture chart. Triggers on: 'mermaid', 'diagram', 'flowchart', 'visualize'.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • naman10parikhSkill

    ecosystem-reference

    Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • naman10parikhSkill

    fractal-delegation

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Liang-MHSkill

    stock_analysis

    获取 A 股、基金和港股的实时行情和技术分析数据

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +6 more from naman10parikh

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 185 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 12

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before writing code or prompts, establish what the skill must accomplish:

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Triggers: When should this skill activate?

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Document these as concrete prompts you'll use later for evaluation.

    line 23
  4. Very specific:

    Keep SKILL.md under 500 lines.

    line 67
  5. Distinctive:

    Imperative form: Use commands, not questions.

    line 75
  6. Distinctive:

    Create 2-3 realistic test prompts that exercise your skill:

    line 89
  7. Distinctive:

    Run prompt WITHOUT the skill active

    line 105
  8. Distinctive:

    Run prompt WITH the skill active

    line 106
  9. Very specific:

    Use the comparator agent (see .claude/agents/comparator.md) for blind evaluation.

    line 110
  10. Distinctive:

    Generalize from feedback: If a test case revealed a gap, did it expose a fundamental skill limitation or just unclear wording?

    line 116
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep prompts lean: Remove redundant instructions.

    line 118
  12. Distinctive:

    Before relying on cloud APIs for evaluation:

    line 132
  13. Distinctive:

    Test the skill's generated prompts directly in Ollama

    line 135
  14. Distinctive:

    Verify the output format and logic correctness before cloud deployment

    line 136

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 185 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill Creator Skill

This skill guides you through the complete lifecycle of creating or improving a Claude OS skill. It combines structured design thinking, iterative testing, and continuous improvement patterns.

1. Capture Intent

Before writing code or prompts, establish what the skill must accomplish:

  • Core purpose: What single capability does this skill provide?
  • Triggers: When should this skill activate? What phrases or patterns invoke it?
  • Expected output: What format, quality, and structure should results have?
  • Test cases: Generate 2-3 realistic use cases that exercise the skill:
    • Best-case scenario
    • Edge case or constraint
    • Potentially ambiguous input

Document these as concrete prompts you'll use later for evaluation.

2. Interview and Research

Thoroughly explore the problem space:

  • Edge cases: What inputs might break the skill? What constraints exist?
  • Input/output formats: How will the skill receive data? What formats must outputs support?
  • Dependencies: What external tools, APIs, or resources does the skill require? Does Ollama suffice for local verification?
  • Compatibility constraints: Which Claude OS versions support this? Any hardware requirements?

3. Write SKILL.md

The SKILL.md file is the manifest and interface for your skill. Structure it with:

  • YAML frontmatter:
    • name: kebab-case identifier
    • description: Make it slightly "pushy" to combat under-triggering. Use action verbs, clarify value. Example: "Instantly convert between formats" rather than "Can help with format conversion"
    • compatibility: Which Claude OS versions
  • Body sections:
    • How to Use: Step-by-step instructions with examples
    • Important Notes: Edge cases, gotchas, timezone/precision issues
    • Example Workflow: Concrete before/after scenario
    • Template: Copy-paste ready JSON/markdown the user can adapt

4. Skill Anatomy

my-skill/
├── SKILL.md              # Required. Metadata + instructions
├── scripts/              # Optional. Supporting executables
│   └── helper.py
├── references/           # Optional. Documentation, specs
│   └── api-reference.md
└── assets/               # Optional. Data files, templates
    └── template.json

Progressive disclosure:

  • SKILL.md metadata always loads (name, description, compatibility)
  • Full SKILL.md content loads when the skill triggers
  • scripts/, references/, assets/ load on-demand when referenced in SKILL.md

Keep SKILL.md under 500 lines. Use hierarchical structure to keep it scannable:

  • H1 for skill title
  • H2 for major sections
  • H3 for subsections
  • Bullet points for steps and guidance

5. Writing Patterns

Imperative form: Use commands, not questions.

  • Good: "Extract all email addresses from the text"
  • Bad: "Can you extract email addresses?"

Examples pattern: Show, don't just tell.

  • Include 2-3 complete examples with input → output
  • Label what's happening at each step

Explain WHY, not just MUST:

  • Good: "Include the full timestamp because downstream systems depend on ISO-8601 format for parsing"
  • Bad: "Always include full timestamp"

6. Test Cases

Create 2-3 realistic test prompts that exercise your skill:

Test 1 (Best case): Standard, straightforward use
"Create a weekly standup meeting schedule for Q2"

Test 2 (Edge case): Constraints, unusual inputs
"Create a meeting schedule that respects no-meeting hours 
 on Fridays, recurring across 6 timezones, with buffer time"

Test 3 (Ambiguity): Underspecified or conflicting requirements
"Schedule this for next Tuesday. Wait, maybe next month? 
 Make it recurring anyway."

Evaluation process:

  1. Run prompt WITHOUT the skill active
  2. Run prompt WITH the skill active
  3. Compare outputs side-by-side
  4. Score on: clarity, completeness, correctness, usability

Use the comparator agent (see .claude/agents/comparator.md) for blind evaluation.

7. Improvement Loop

After testing:

  1. Generalize from feedback: If a test case revealed a gap, did it expose a fundamental skill limitation or just unclear wording?
  2. Keep prompts lean: Remove redundant instructions. Every line must earn its place.
  3. Explain the why: Users learn faster when they understand reasoning, not just rules.
  4. Look for repeated work: Across your test cases, what patterns repeat? Extract them into reusable sections.
  5. Run iteratively:
    • Fix skill
    • Re-test with same 3 prompts
    • Score improvements
    • Adjust again if needed

8. LOCAL-FIRST Verification

Before relying on cloud APIs for evaluation:

  • Use Ollama with qwen3-coder or similar for local evaluation of skill outputs
  • Test the skill's generated prompts directly in Ollama
  • Verify the output format and logic correctness before cloud deployment
  • This reduces API costs and feedback latency

9. Reference Other Agents

Your skill may benefit from collaboration with Claude OS agents:

  • grader.md (.claude/agents/grader.md): Evaluate skill outputs against explicit expectations. Use for formal test grading.
  • comparator.md (.claude/agents/comparator.md): Blind comparison of two skill variants. Use for A/B testing iterations.
  • analyzer.md (.claude/agents/analyzer.md): Post-hoc analysis of why one skill outperformed another. Use to extract improvement insights.

Summary Checklist

  • Intent captured: purpose, triggers, outputs, test cases defined
  • Research complete: edge cases, dependencies, constraints identified
  • SKILL.md written: metadata, sections, examples, template included
  • Anatomy organized: scripts/, references/, assets/ structured (if needed)
  • Writing patterns applied: imperative, examples, explanations throughout
  • Test cases created: 2-3 realistic scenarios drafted
  • Local verification done: Ollama tested the generated prompts
  • Iteration complete: grader/comparator/analyzer feedback incorporated
  • Documentation finished: README, edge case notes, troubleshooting guide complete

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.