agentleFS
adoptaiadoptai/cpa-skills/skills/consolidation-rollup/SKILL.md

consolidation-rollup

Skill8 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Consolidate multiple entities' trial balances into one consolidated TB — mapping each entity's chart of accounts to a consolidated line, translating through FX with a formula-driven cumulative translation adjustment (CTA), and posting elimination entries at the worksheet level — every consolidated figure traced to its entity source. Use for consolidating entities, a multi-entity or multi-subsidiary close, rolling up trial balances, consolidated financial statements, parent/subsidiary consolidation, FX translation, or CTA. Trigger on "consolidate the entities," "roll up the trial balances," "build the consolidated TB," "translate the foreign sub," "what's our CTA," or when two or more entity TBs are given together for a group close. For proving intercompany AR/AP agree before eliminating, use intercompany-recon first — this skill posts the elimination it's given and checks it balances, it does not derive the amount. For one entity's own TB integrity, use trial-balance-integrity before this. Runs fully local.

  • Installs packages

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No clean consolidated TB unless:

    line 31
  2. Distinctive:

    An entity on the reporting currency should show a zero CTA: If it does not, something is wrong with the mapping or the data, not with …

    line 122

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Consolidation Rollup

A consolidated trial balance is a parent entity's TB, every subsidiary's TB translated into one reporting currency, and a layer of elimination entries — summed by consolidated line and proved to tie. Each of those three pieces has its own, separate failure mode: a chart-of-accounts mapping gap silently drops an account from the consolidation while every entity's own TB still balances; a translation that uses one rate for the whole balance sheet manufactures an imbalance that has nothing to do with CTA; and an elimination entry that does not itself balance corrupts every consolidated line it touches. This skill tests each piece on its own terms before it lets the pieces combine.

The one distinction that matters most

A cumulative translation adjustment is a formula, not a plug. Translating assets and liabilities at the closing rate, revenue and expense at the average rate, and equity at a historical rate is required by the mechanics of foreign currency translation — and it necessarily leaves each entity's own translated trial balance out of balance by an exact, derivable amount. That residual is the cumulative translation adjustment under ASC 830 / IAS 21. It is computed here strictly from the rates you supplied in mapping.csv and fx_rates.csv, reported as its own named equity line, and it is never used to absorb anything else. An unmapped account and an unbalanced elimination entry are not CTA — they are gate failures, reported as such, never quietly netted into the one number that is allowed to be a residual.

The gate

No clean consolidated TB unless:

  1. Every entity's own trial balance balances, debits to credits, before anything downstream touches it. An entity TB that does not balance is not a consolidation problem — route it back through trial-balance-integrity first.
  2. Every elimination entry balances by its own entry_id. An entry whose debits and credits do not agree is excluded from the consolidation entirely — none of its lines post — never applied half-complete.
  3. Every entity TB account maps to a consolidated line and a statement type. An unmapped account is reported individually with its own balance, never defaulted into an "other" line, and it blocks the clean gate.
  4. Every functional currency other than the reporting currency has both a closing rate and an average rate supplied. This script will not assume a 1:1 rate. A missing historical rate is allowed to fall back to the closing rate, but only visibly, flagged on every sheet that uses it — never a silent assumption.
  5. The consolidated trial balance ties — debits equal credits to the cent, with CTA included as its own line — and every consolidated figure traces to the entity-level rows that produced it in the Entity Detail tab.
  6. Every intercompany-tagged elimination entry is checked against its pair's reconciliation status, when --ic-status is supplied. A pair that is not RECONCILED keeps that elimination provisional, not final.

Scope: what this skill is not

  • It does not split non-controlling interest for a partially-owned entity. An entity with ownership_pct under 100 is flagged in the Summary and the memo; the NCI entry is a separate journal entry you supply through --elimination-entries, not something this script computes. Deciding how NCI should be presented is a judgment call outside the mechanical layer — see AGENTS.md rule 4.
  • It does not derive an intercompany elimination amount. It posts whatever elimination-entries.csv gives it and checks that each entry balances. Run intercompany-recon first to prove the amount, and feed its proven, already-translated position in here.
  • It does not perform the full ASC 830 historical rollforward of retained earnings — opening retained earnings at its own historical rate, plus current-year net income at the average rate, less dividends at the rate when declared. It translates whatever balance sits in the equity-mapped GL account at a single historical rate (or the closing rate, flagged, if no historical rate was supplied). If GAAP-precision equity translation matters for this engagement, split the account before mapping it.
  • It does not book journal entries anywhere. Everything this skill produces is presentation of what you gave it.
  • It does not decide whether an unreconciled intercompany pair's elimination is close enough to post anyway. It posts it and calls it provisional; a controller decides whether that is acceptable for a flash close.

Inputs

  1. Entities — entity_id, entity_name, functional_currency, ownership_pct. ownership_pct is optional and defaults to 100; anything else is flagged as an NCI exception.
  2. Entity trial balances, all of them in one file — entity_id, account_number, account_name, debit, credit. Every entity_id referenced here must appear in entities.csv first.
  3. Chart-of-accounts mapping — entity_id, account_number, consolidated_code, consolidated_line, stmt_type. entity_id may be * to apply to any entity not matched more specifically by its own ID — useful when entities share a chart of accounts. stmt_type (asset | liability | equity | revenue | expense) is what selects the translation rate, so get it right: it is a mechanical lookup, not a label.
  4. FX rates, required for every functional currency other than the reporting currency — currency, rate_type, rate_to_reporting where rate_type is closing, average, or historical. Closing and average are mandatory; historical falls back to closing, flagged, if omitted.
  5. Elimination entries, optional — entry_id, consolidated_line, stmt_type, debit, credit, description, entity_a, entity_b, source. These post directly against a consolidated line in reporting currency — the standard worksheet treatment for investment elimination, intercompany AR/AP elimination, intercompany profit elimination, and any other consolidating entry. entity_a/entity_b are optional; populate both on an intercompany elimination so it can be checked against --ic-status.
  6. IC pair status, optional — entity_a, entity_b, status, e.g. intercompany-recon's own Pair Summary tab exported to CSV. Confirm before running: is this the current period's recon, not a prior period's?

Step 1 — Run

python3 scripts/consolidation_rollup.py \
  --entities entities.csv --trial-balances entity_tb.csv --mapping mapping.csv \
  --fx-rates fx_rates.csv --reporting-currency USD \
  --elimination-entries elimination_entries.csv --ic-status ic_pair_status.csv \
  --client "Acme Group" --period "2026-09" \
  --out "Acme Group - 2026-09 Consolidated TB.xlsx"

The script runs the six gate tests in order, translates every mapped account using the rate its stmt_type implies, computes each currency-translated entity's CTA as the exact balancing residual, applies the elimination entries that balance, and refuses a clean result if anything above failed. The filename gets an [INCOMPLETE] suffix whenever it does.

Step 2 — Read the CTA line, don't just accept it

The FX & CTA tab shows, per entity, the translated debit and credit totals that produced its CTA figure. Two things are worth checking before you move on:

  • An entity on the reporting currency should show a zero CTA. If it does not, something is wrong with the mapping or the data, not with translation — there is no real translation effect to explain it.
  • An entity with unmapped accounts gets a note calling its CTA provisional. The CTA for that entity was computed off an incomplete subset of its accounts; treat the number as directional until the mapping gap in Test 3 is closed and you re-run.

Step 3 — Close the unmapped gap

consolidation_unmapped.csv lists every TB account the mapping did not recognize, by entity, with its raw functional-currency balance. Add the missing (entity_id, account_number) rows to mapping.csv — or a * row if the account exists identically across entities — and re-run. Nothing is translated or consolidated for an unmapped account; it simply does not appear in the Consolidated Trial Balance until it is placed correctly. A wrong placement is worse than a missing one, so the script never guesses a stmt_type or a line for you.

Step 4 — Deliver

Workbook tabs:

  1. Consolidation Summary — the six gate tests with pass/fail and detail, consolidated debit/credit totals, and a by-entity table (currency, ownership %, TB balanced, unmapped count, CTA amount and side). The signable page.
  2. Consolidated Trial Balance — every consolidated line with debit, credit, and net, grouped and subtotaled by statement type, with the consolidated total at the foot.
  3. Entity Detail — every mapped account, by entity: functional-currency balance, the rate type and rate applied, whether that rate was an approximation, and the translated reporting-currency balance. This is what "every figure traced" means in practice — any consolidated number can be traced back here to the entity rows that built it.
  4. Unmapped Accounts — accounts with no consolidated line, by entity, in functional currency. Empty is the goal.
  5. Elimination Entries — every entry supplied, whether it posted, and the IC reconciliation status for any entry tagged with both entity_a and entity_b.
  6. FX & CTA — the rate table (closing/average/historical per currency, with approximations flagged) and the per-entity CTA computation.
  7. Exceptions & Memo — failing gate tests, NCI entities out of scope, provisional eliminations, and the CTA-is-not-a-plug reminder.

Then, in chat: whether the gate passed, the consolidated total, the CTA by entity, and any unmapped accounts or provisional eliminations — lead with whichever of those is blocking a clean result.

What to escalate

  • A material CTA swing from the prior period without a corresponding FX rate movement of similar scale — that points at a rate or mapping error, not a currency event.
  • An unmapped account with a material balance. It is excluded from the consolidation entirely until mapped, which understates the group's position in exactly the direction nobody notices until an auditor does.
  • A stmt_type that disagrees across entities for what should be the same consolidated line (flagged as a conflict on the Consolidated Trial Balance tab) — this means two entities' mappings disagree about whether an account is, say, a liability or equity, which the script cannot resolve on its own.
  • A partially-owned entity with no NCI entry ever supplied, period after period. The consolidated equity this skill produces is not final for that entity until NCI is booked.
  • An elimination entry tagged to an intercompany pair that stays unreconciled two periods running. Same pattern intercompany-recon flags, one layer up.
  • A historical-rate approximation on an equity account with a large, old balance — the older the balance, the more a closing-rate approximation can distort CTA relative to the true historical-rate translation.

Security posture

Fully local: standard library plus openpyxl. No network calls, no uploads, no telemetry. Entity names, balances, and ownership structure never leave the machine.

Dependencies

pip install openpyxl

Built by Adopt AI — free to use and modify.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.