agentleFS
adityaarsharmaadityaarsharma/wordpress-malware-removal/skills/wp-hardening/SKILL.md

wp-hardening

Skill33 starsChanged 4 months agoAGPL-3.0View on GitHub

Safely harden a WordPress site — "lock the doors so it doesn't happen again." Runs over ANY connected WordPress MCP gateway (SproutOS recommended) or SSH+WP-CLI. Applies idempotent, reversible hardening: disable the file editor, turn off debug output, rotate salts, block PHP execution in uploads, disable directory listing, add non-breaking security headers, cap revisions, enable minor auto-updates — and, with confirmation, the riskier controls (fix file permissions, FORCE_SSL_ADMIN, HSTS, disable XML-RPC, hide REST user enumeration, limit-login, DISALLOW_FILE_MODS). Every change is classified SAFE / RISKY / MANUAL by blast radius, wrapped in sentinel markers so it is idempotent and cleanly reversible, and gated on a confirmed backup. Use when the user asks to harden or secure a WordPress site, apply a security checklist, or close the entry vector after a cleanup. For a read-only posture score first use wp-security-audit; to remove an active infection use wp-malware-removal.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.