build
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute the next unblocked task from a Blueprint tasks.md — read only that task's component and acceptance criteria, make the focused change, prove it with the done-when check, tick the box. Use when the user says "/blueprint:build", "do the next task", "implement T4", "continue the blueprint", or wants the spec turned into code one reviewable commit at a time.
- Commits and pushes
156 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jskswamy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lilly-builds/senior-engineer-modetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DnsQueen/orcinus-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use backprop, finances and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JuliusBrusseeSkillbackprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GerardoRdz96Skillfinances
Use when Gera talks about his money — logging an expense ("I spent X on Y"), checking where he stands this pay-period, closing a period, planning debt payoff, onboarding his financial picture, or asking for budgeting/finance opinions. Servy's financial brain. Triggers — "I spent", "log this expense", "where am I this period", "close the period", "how's my budget", "debt plan", "should I pay off", "finances onboard", "/finances".
Also in 3 projects that use this
cpiprintSkillfavicon
Generate favicons from a source image
Also in 3 projects that use this
madeehahassanSkillGo-Live
Pre-launch checklist. Use before making any app public, sharing a link externally, or announcing a product launch. Adapts to Claude Code, claude.ai, and Cowork.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JuliusBrusseeSkilldeepen
Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent rewrites. Triggers when the user says "deepen this", "improve the design", "this module feels shallow", "pull complexity down", "use spare budget on the codebase", or invokes /ck:deepen. Leans on the codebase-design skill's deep-module vocabulary when present.
Also in 3 projects that use this
synaptiaiSkillgate
Create a BDSK review_gate artifact. Defines a checkpoint that controls whether generated output may proceed toward acceptance. Use when defining quality, security, or scope gates for execution plans.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions156 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 156
- FalkorDB/FalkorDB★ 10ksame name
- microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml★ 8.6ksame name
- NexaAI/nexa-sdk★ 8.5ksame name
- hathach/tinyusb★ 7.3ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- pytorch/TensorRT★ 3ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- iPlug2/iPlug2★ 2.4ksame name
146 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- architectureSkill
- inspectSkill
- requirementsSkill
- tasksSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 143 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/FORMAT.md first (or FORMAT.md at the repo root if you are working inside the blueprint repo itself).
- Distinctive: line 23
All tasks checked → say so, and go to Phase close below.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not read the whole spec, and do not implement anything that is not in the cited component.
- Very specific: line 41
If on the repository's default branch, create a feature branch first (blueprint/<slug>).
- Very specific: line 47
Write the test that asserts the cited ACs, in the same pass.
- Very specific: line 50
Run done-when. Paste the real output.
- Very specific: line 53
Only after done-when genuinely passes, tick the box in tasks.md: - [x] T7 ....
- Distinctive: line 56
Do not commit unless the user asked.
- Distinctive: line 61
Stop and ask if, while implementing, you find that:
- Distinctive: line 75
When the last task in a phase is ticked:
- Distinctive: line 77
Run the full test suite, not just this task's check.
- Very specific: line 78
Run /code-review on the branch diff.
- Distinctive: line 99
Never tick a box without a passing check.
- Distinctive: line 100
Never edit requirements.md or architecture.md from this skill.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 143 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Blueprint: build
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/FORMAT.md first (or FORMAT.md at the repo root
if you are working inside the blueprint repo itself).
One task per invocation. Stop when it is done. That boundary is the point of this skill — it is what keeps a diff reviewable.
Select the task
Argument may be a slug, a task id (T4), both, or nothing.
- Resolve the feature: argument slug → single
.blueprint/*/tasks.md→ ask. - Explicit
T<n>given → use it, but refuse if its(after ...)dependencies are unchecked. Say which. - Otherwise take the first
[ ]task, in phase order, whose dependencies are all[x]. - All tasks checked → say so, and go to Phase close below.
Load only what the task cites
This is the discipline that makes the change focused. For task
T7 ... → C2 | R1.AC1, R1.AC2, read:
- the
### C2section of architecture.md — files, interface, dependencies - the
R1.AC1andR1.AC2lines of requirements.md - the files the task names, and their existing tests
- whatever those files actually call, as far as you need to understand them
Do not read the whole spec, and do not implement anything that is not in the cited component. Work you notice is needed but that no task covers is a finding, not a licence — note it and raise it at the end.
Execute
- If on the repository's default branch, create a feature branch first
(
blueprint/<slug>). Do not commit tomaindirectly. - Make the change. Match the surrounding code — its naming, its error handling, its test style. The component interface in architecture.md is a contract; if you must deviate from the declared signature, that is a spec change, see Escalate.
- Write the test that asserts the cited ACs, in the same pass. A task whose
done-whenis a test command is not done until that test exists and fails for the right reason before it passes. - Run
done-when. Paste the real output. If it fails, fix and rerun. If it fails for a reason outside this task's scope, stop and report — do not widen the diff to make a check go green. - Only after
done-whengenuinely passes, tick the box in tasks.md:- [x] **T7** .... Never tick a box on the strength of "the code looks right". - Do not commit unless the user asked. Report what changed and let them look.
Escalate, do not improvise
Stop and ask if, while implementing, you find that:
- the component's declared interface does not work
- the task depends on something no earlier task built
- an acceptance criterion is untestable or contradicts another
- the change needs files outside the component's declared set
Say which document is wrong and what the amendment would be
(/blueprint:architecture <slug> to add C7, or a new R-id). Silently
deviating from the spec destroys the traceability that the rest of this
plugin depends on — the docs stop describing the code and become a lie.
Phase close
When the last task in a phase is ticked:
- Run the full test suite, not just this task's check.
- Run
/code-reviewon the branch diff. Report the findings; apply only what the user approves. Offer a PR. If accepted,
gh pr createwith a body that lists the phase's task ids and the requirements they satisfy, so a reviewer can check the claim:## Phase 1 — Storage - T1, T2 → C1 (TokenStore) Satisfies R1.AC1, R1.AC2, R3.AC1
Done
Report, in this order: task id and title, files changed, the done-when
output, anything you escalated, and the next unblocked task. No summary of
code the user can read in the diff.
Rules
- One task per run. Continue only if the user says continue.
- Never tick a box without a passing check.
- Never edit requirements.md or architecture.md from this skill. Escalate instead.
- Scope is the cited component. Refactors, cleanups, and improvements you spot along the way get reported, not committed.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

