speckit-converge
Skill337 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 72 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
- Very specific: line 24
If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_converge key
- Common: line 25
If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Very specific: line 28
If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
- Very specific: line 29
If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- Very specific: line 30
When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-).
- Very specific: line 58
If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently
- Very specific: line 85
When the codebase already satisfies everything, the command MUST leave tasks.md
- Very specific: line 97
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR …
- Very specific: line 103
If spec.md, plan.md, or tasks.md is missing, STOP with a clear, actionable message naming the prerequisite command to run (/speckit-specify …
- Common: line 138
Create an internal model (do not echo raw artifacts):
- Very specific: line 167
Little or no code yet: treat the entire specified scope as missing remaining work rather than failing.
- Common: line 183
Before appending anything, output a compact, severity-graded summary (no file writes yet):
- Very specific: line 207
Write a single new section header ## Phase N: Convergence.
- Common: line 222
Never reuse or renumber existing IDs.
- Very specific: line 227
Do not modify tasks.md at all — no empty phase header.
- Very specific: line 241
After producing the result, check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 72 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
User Input
$ARGUMENTSYou MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before convergence):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_convergekey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (
.) with hyphens (-). For example,speckit.git.commit→/speckit-git-commit. - For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}`Mandatory hook (
optional: false):## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal
{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
Goal
Close the gap between what a feature's specification, plan, and tasks call for and what the
codebase currently implements. Read spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md as the sole
source of intent (with the constitution as governing constraints), assess the current
state of the code, determine which requirements, acceptance criteria, plan decisions, and
existing tasks are unmet, incomplete, or only partially satisfied, and append each piece
of remaining work as a new, traceable task at the bottom of tasks.md so that
/speckit-implement can complete it. This command MUST run only after
/speckit-implement has run on the current tasks.md, and after /speckit-tasks has produced a complete tasks.md.
This is not a diff tool and does not track changes. It assesses the present state of the code relative to the feature's artifacts — no git, no branch comparison, no history.
Operating Constraints
APPEND-ONLY, NEVER REWRITE: The command's only write is appending a new
## Phase N: Convergence section to tasks.md. It MUST NOT:
- modify
spec.mdorplan.mdin any way; - rewrite, renumber, reorder, or delete any existing task (including tasks from a prior Convergence phase);
- modify, create, or delete any application code — completing the appended tasks is the
job of
/speckit-implement.
When the codebase already satisfies everything, the command MUST leave tasks.md
byte-for-byte unchanged (no empty Convergence header) and report a clean result.
Constitution Authority: The project constitution (.specify/memory/constitution.md) is
non-negotiable. Code that violates a MUST principle is the highest-severity finding and
produces a corresponding remediation task. If the constitution is an unfilled template,
skip constitution checks gracefully rather than failing.
Execution Steps
1. Initialize Convergence Context
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
- CONSTITUTION =
.specify/memory/constitution.md(if present) Ifspec.md,plan.md, ortasks.mdis missing, STOP with a clear, actionable message naming the prerequisite command to run (/speckit-specifyfor a missing spec,/speckit-planfor a missing plan,/speckit-tasksfor missing tasks). Do not produce partial output. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
From spec.md:
- Functional Requirements (FR-###)
- Success Criteria (SC-###) — include only items requiring buildable work; exclude post-launch outcome metrics and business KPIs
- User Stories and their Acceptance Scenarios
- Edge Cases (if present)
From plan.md:
- Architecture/stack choices and technical decisions
- Data Model references
- Phases and named touch-points (files/components the plan says will be created or edited)
- Technical constraints
From tasks.md:
- Task IDs (to compute the next ID and next phase number)
- Descriptions, phase grouping, and referenced file paths
From constitution (if not an unfilled template):
- Principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
3. Build the Intent Inventory
Create an internal model (do not echo raw artifacts):
- Requirements inventory: one stable key per FR-### / SC-### / user-story acceptance
scenario (e.g.
US1/AC2), plus the plan decisions and constitution principles that impose buildable obligations. - Code-scope map: from the file paths named in
plan.mdandtasks.md, plus a keyword search for the concepts each requirement describes, derive the set of source files and components in scope for assessment. Bound the assessment to these — do not infer scope beyond what the artifacts define.
4. Assess the Codebase and Classify Findings
For each item in the intent inventory, inspect the current code in scope and produce a
Finding only where there is a gap. Classify every finding by gap type:
missing: the required work is absent from the code entirely.partial: the work exists but does not yet fully satisfy the requirement / acceptance criterion / plan decision.contradicts: the code does something that conflicts with stated intent or a constitution MUST principle.unrequested: the code contains work not called for by the spec, plan, or tasks (surfaced for awareness — converge does not delete code, it only appends a task to review/justify or remove it).
Each Finding records: a stable id, the source-ref it traces to, the gap-type, a
severity, and a short human-readable description with the evidence (the file/area observed).
Edge cases:
- Little or no code yet: treat the entire specified scope as
missingremaining work rather than failing. - Nothing remains: produce zero findings and follow the converged branch in Step 7.
5. Assign Severity
- CRITICAL: violates a constitution MUST principle, or a
missing/contradictsgap that blocks baseline functionality of a P1 user story. - HIGH: a
missingorpartialgap on a core functional requirement or acceptance criterion. - MEDIUM: a
partialgap on a secondary requirement, or anunrequestedaddition with unclear justification. - LOW: minor partial gaps, polish, or low-risk
unrequestedadditions.
6. Present the In-Session Findings Summary
Before appending anything, output a compact, severity-graded summary (no file writes yet):
Convergence Findings
| ID | Gap Type | Severity | Source | Evidence | Remaining Work |
| F1 | missing | HIGH | FR-008 | Example: no append-only guard detected in path/to/module.py when writing tasks.md | Add append-only enforcement |
Summary metrics:
- Requirements / acceptance criteria checked
- Plan decisions checked
- Constitution principles checked (or "skipped — template")
- Findings by gap type (missing / partial / contradicts / unrequested)
- Findings by severity
7. Append Convergence Tasks (or report converged)
If there are one or more actionable findings (tasks_appended outcome):
Append to the end of tasks.md, per the append contract:
- Scan all existing task IDs; let
Mbe the maximum. Determine the next phase numberN(highest existing phase + 1). - Write a single new section header
## Phase N: Convergence. Emit one checklist item per actionable finding, ordered CRITICAL/HIGH first, assigning zero-padded IDs
T{M+1:03d}, T{M+2:03d}, …:- [ ] T042 <imperative description> per <source-ref> (<gap-type>)<source-ref>traces the task to its origin: e.g.FR-003,SC-002,US1/AC2,plan: storage decision,Constitution II.<gap-type>is one ofmissing,partial,contradicts,unrequested.Constitution-violation tasks MUST be emitted first and described as
CRITICAL.- Never reuse or renumber existing IDs. If a prior Convergence phase exists, add a new, separately-numbered one below it — do not touch the old one.
If there are no actionable findings (converged outcome):
- Do not modify
tasks.mdat all — no empty phase header. - Report: "✅ Converged — the implementation satisfies the spec, plan, and tasks."
- Include the summary counts of what was checked.
8. Provide Next Actions (Handoff)
- On
tasks_appended: state how many tasks were appended under which phase, and recommend running/speckit-implementto complete them; note that a follow-up converge run will find fewer or no remaining items. - On
converged: recommend proceeding to review / opening a PR. No further implement pass is needed for this feature's specified scope.
9. Check for extension hooks
After producing the result, check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.after_convergekey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- Report the convergence outcome (
convergedortasks_appended) in-session before listing any hooks, so users can decide whether to run optional follow-up commands. - When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (
.) with hyphens (-). For example,speckit.git.commit→/speckit-git-commit. - For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}`Mandatory hook (
optional: false):## Extension Hooks **Automatic Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal
{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
Trending
Cooling: 7 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, 0.5× the 4 weeks before.
Other versions76 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- rshade/finfocus★ 11100% same
- darinh/copilot-tools★ 1100% same
- akuroiwa/mcts-gen★ 0100% same
- nowo-tech/GenerativeSeoKitBundle★ 0100% same
Edited · 72
- hhyo/Archery★ 7.1k99% same
- pamburus/hl★ 3.3k93% same
- nornir-automation/nornir★ 1.6k99% same
- Azure/agent-landing-zone★ 1.2k99% same
- Azure/GPT-RAG★ 1.2k99% same
- dotCMS/core★ 97193% same
- georgedouzas/sports-betting★ 81299% same
- opsmill/infrahub★ 53899% same
- Azure/missionlz★ 29693% same
- nota-daw/nota★ 20193% same
62 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use speckit-agent-context-update, speckit-git-commit and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Sorcha-PlatformSkillspeckit-agent-context-update
Refresh the managed Spec Kit section in the coding agent context file
Also in 6 projects that use this
Sorcha-PlatformSkillspeckit-git-commit
Auto-commit changes after a Spec Kit command completes
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +4 more from Sorcha-Platform
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- speckit-analyzeSkill
- speckit-checklistSkill
- speckit-clarifySkill
- speckit-constitutionSkill
- speckit-implementSkill
- speckit-planSkill
- speckit-specifySkill
- speckit-tasksSkill
- speckit-taskstoissuesSkill
- speckit-analyzeSkill
- speckit-checklistSkill
- speckit-clarifySkill
- speckit-constitutionSkill
- speckit-convergeSkill
- speckit-implementSkill
- speckit-planSkill
- speckit-specifySkill
- speckit-tasksSkill
- speckit-taskstoissuesSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

