agentleFS
acaprariacaprari/specdriven-skills/CLAUDE.md

specdriven-skills

CLAUDE.md1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

A Claude Code skill suite for spec-driven development. Each skill lives in skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md. There are six skills: spec:core, spec:bootstrap, spec:maintain, spec:capture, spec:infer, spec:validate. Use superpowers:writing-skills for every addition or modification. The full RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle is mandatory: 1. RED — write a pressure scenario and run it WITHOUT the skill. Document exact agent failures and rationalizations verbatim. 2. GREEN — write the skill addressing those specific failures. Run the same scenario WITH the skill. Verify the agent complies. 3. REFACTOR —…

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use superpowers:writing-skills for every addition or modification.

    line 12

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

specdriven-skills — Contributor Guidelines

What this repo is

A Claude Code skill suite for spec-driven development. Each skill lives in skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md. There are six skills: spec:core, spec:bootstrap, spec:maintain, spec:capture, spec:infer, spec:validate.

Adding or modifying skills

Use superpowers:writing-skills for every addition or modification. The full RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle is mandatory:

  1. RED — write a pressure scenario and run it WITHOUT the skill. Document exact agent failures and rationalizations verbatim.
  2. GREEN — write the skill addressing those specific failures. Run the same scenario WITH the skill. Verify the agent complies.
  3. REFACTOR — run at least one harder scenario (loophole pressure). Close any new rationalizations. Re-verify.

No skill without a failing test first. This applies to new skills and to edits of existing skills. No exceptions.

Before committing

Show every new or modified skill to the user for review before committing. One skill per commit.

What not to commit

Any files generated during testing (e.g. spec files created in /tmp).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.