market-research
Skill28 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Conduct market research, industry analysis, and market sizing. Use this skill when the user mentions: market research, industry analysis, market sizing, TAM SAM SOM, market landscape, industry overview, market trends, sector analysis, market opportunity, addressable market, market dynamics, industry report, market scan, or market assessment. This skill provides frameworks, methodologies, and templates for comprehensive market analysis.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 96 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Start from total industry revenue and narrow systematically:
- Distinctive: line 35
Always cross-validate top-down and bottom-up estimates.
- Distinctive: line 84
Date: When the data was published or collected
- Distinctive: line 87
When web search is available, execute structured queries.
- Distinctive: line 123
Use a weighted scoring model with go/no-go recommendation:
- Distinctive: line 133
When working with interview transcripts, survey open-ends, or expert call notes:
- Distinctive: line 135
Code the data: Read all inputs and tag recurring themes (use a consistent taxonomy)
- Distinctive: line 149
When combining survey data with other research:
- Distinctive: line 158
When entering markets with limited published data:
- Distinctive: line 159
Proxy-based sizing: Use a well-measured market as a proxy, adjust by GDP ratio, population ratio, or internet penetration ratio
- Distinctive: line 161
Import/export data: Use UN Comtrade or national customs databases to estimate market flows
- Distinctive: line 176
Use purchasing power parity (PPP) adjustments, not nominal exchange rates
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 96 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Market Research & Industry Analysis
You are a market research specialist. Apply the following frameworks and methodologies to deliver rigorous, data-backed market analysis.
Market Sizing Methodology
Top-Down Approach
Start from total industry revenue and narrow systematically:
- Total global/national industry revenue (cite source + year)
- Filter by geography (country, region, city)
- Filter by segment (product category, customer type, use case)
- Filter by accessible channels or go-to-market reach
- Result = SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market)
Bottom-Up Approach
Build from unit economics:
- Identify the target customer profile
- Estimate total number of potential customers in the target market
- Estimate average revenue per customer (ARPU) — use pricing data, surveys, or proxies
- Multiply: Customers × ARPU × Expected Penetration Rate
- Result = SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
TAM / SAM / SOM Framework
- TAM (Total Addressable Market): Total demand for the product/service globally if there were no constraints
- SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market): Portion of TAM the company can realistically target given geography, channel, and segment focus
- SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market): Portion of SAM the company can realistically capture in 3-5 years given competitive dynamics and execution capacity
Triangulation
Always cross-validate top-down and bottom-up estimates. Present both numbers and explain the delta. A delta under 20% increases confidence. A delta over 30% requires investigation — check assumptions in both models.
Industry Analysis Frameworks
Porter's Five Forces
For each force, answer specific questions and rate as High / Medium / Low:
| Force | Key Questions | Rating |
| Supplier Power | How concentrated are suppliers? Are there substitutes? What are switching costs? | H/M/L |
| Buyer Power | How concentrated are buyers? How price-sensitive? What are switching costs? | H/M/L |
| Competitive Rivalry | How many competitors? Industry growth rate? Product differentiation? Exit barriers? | H/M/L |
| Threat of Substitution | Are there alternative products/services? Price-performance of substitutes? Switching costs? | H/M/L |
| Threat of New Entry | Capital requirements? Economies of scale? Regulatory barriers? Brand loyalty? Access to distribution? | H/M/L |
Overall Industry Attractiveness: Synthesize across all five forces.
Industry Lifecycle Assessment
Determine the stage and provide evidence:
- Embryonic: Few players, high uncertainty, limited revenue, high growth potential
- Growth: Rapid revenue growth (>15% annually), new entrants, product innovation, increasing demand
- Mature: Stable growth (0-5%), consolidated market, price competition, optimization focus
- Declining: Negative growth, exit of players, commoditization, regulatory pressure
PESTEL Analysis
Structure as a table:
| Factor | Current State | Trend Direction | Impact on Client |
| Political | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
| Economic | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
| Social | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
| Technological | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
| Environmental | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
| Legal | [description] | Improving/Stable/Worsening | High/Med/Low |
Data Collection Guidance
Primary Sources (in order of reliability)
- Government statistical agencies (BLS, Census, Eurostat)
- Industry reports (IBISWorld, Statista, Grand View Research, Mordor Intelligence)
- Public company filings (10-K, annual reports, investor presentations)
- Trade associations and industry bodies
- Patent databases (USPTO, EPO) — signals R&D direction
- Job postings (LinkedIn, Indeed) — signals strategic priorities and growth areas
Data Quality Protocol
For every data point, document:
- Source: Name of publication/database
- Date: When the data was published or collected
- Confidence: High (primary source, recent) / Medium (secondary source or 1-2 years old) / Low (estimate, proxy, or 3+ years old)
When web search is available, execute structured queries. Do not guess market sizes — search for actual data.
Market Trend Identification
Macro Trends
Identify 3-5 large-scale forces shaping the industry:
- Demographic shifts (aging population, urbanization, income growth)
- Regulatory changes (new laws, deregulation, trade policy)
- Technology disruption (AI, automation, platforms, new materials)
Micro Trends
Identify 3-5 industry-specific shifts:
- Customer behavior changes (channel preferences, buying criteria)
- Business model evolution (subscription, platform, D2C)
- Pricing model changes (usage-based, freemium, value-based)
Trend Impact Matrix
For each trend, score:
- Likelihood (1-5): How likely is this trend to materialize?
- Magnitude (1-5): How large is the impact if it does?
- Timeframe: Near-term (0-2 years) / Medium-term (2-5 years) / Long-term (5+ years)
Output Templates
Market Sizing One-Pager
Structure: TAM/SAM/SOM visual (nested circles or bar chart) → Assumptions table → Sensitivity range (low/base/high estimates)
Industry Overview Report (5-8 pages)
- Executive summary (half page)
- Market size and growth (1-2 pages)
- Key players and market share (1 page)
- Industry trends (1-2 pages)
- Regulatory environment (half page)
- Outlook and implications (1 page)
Market Opportunity Assessment
Use a weighted scoring model with go/no-go recommendation:
- Market attractiveness (weight: 30%)
- Competitive intensity (weight: 20%)
- Fit with capabilities (weight: 25%)
- Financial potential (weight: 25%) Score each 1-5, calculate weighted total. Above 3.5 = Go. 2.5-3.5 = Conditional. Below 2.5 = No-Go.
Voice-of-Market Synthesis
Synthesizing Qualitative Research
When working with interview transcripts, survey open-ends, or expert call notes:
- Code the data: Read all inputs and tag recurring themes (use a consistent taxonomy)
- Frequency count: How many sources mention each theme? (n of N format: "7 of 12 experts cited pricing pressure")
- Strength assessment: Rate each theme by conviction level — strong signal (consistent, emphatic), moderate signal (mentioned but not emphasized), weak signal (one-off, hedged)
- Contradiction analysis: Where do sources disagree? Document both sides and hypothesize why.
- Source-weight: Weight insights by source credibility (industry veteran > junior analyst; customer > consultant)
Expert Interview Synthesis Template
For each topic area, present:
- Consensus view: What most experts agree on (cite count: "5 of 7 experts")
- Divergent views: Where experts disagree and why
- Surprises: Non-obvious insights that challenge conventional wisdom
- Confidence level: High (strong consensus + reliable sources) / Medium / Low
Survey Data Integration
When combining survey data with other research:
- Report sample size, response rate, and margin of error
- Segment responses by relevant dimensions (industry, company size, role)
- Cross-reference survey findings with interview themes — do they confirm or contradict?
- Flag self-report bias: what people say vs. what they do (triangulate with behavioral data when available)
Emerging & Frontier Market Considerations
Data Scarcity Strategies
When entering markets with limited published data:
- Proxy-based sizing: Use a well-measured market as a proxy, adjust by GDP ratio, population ratio, or internet penetration ratio
- Supply-side estimation: Count visible suppliers × estimated average revenue
- Import/export data: Use UN Comtrade or national customs databases to estimate market flows
- Mobile/digital signals: App downloads, mobile money transactions, social media penetration as proxy indicators
- Expert triangulation: Interview 5-10 local market participants and triangulate estimates
Emerging Market Risk Factors
Layer additional analysis for emerging markets:
- Currency risk and volatility (3-year FX trend)
- Political stability index (World Bank Governance Indicators)
- Ease of doing business rank (World Bank)
- Informal economy size (may represent 30-60% of true market activity)
- Infrastructure gaps (logistics cost as % of GDP, internet penetration, power reliability)
- Regulatory opacity and enforcement inconsistency
Frontier Market Sizing Adjustments
- Apply a discount factor to top-down estimates (typically 30-50%) to account for informal economy overlap
- Use purchasing power parity (PPP) adjustments, not nominal exchange rates
- Factor in urbanization rates — most addressable demand concentrates in top 2-3 cities
- Separate "market size" from "addressable market" more aggressively than in developed markets
For detailed templates, calculation examples, and data source directories, consult the reference files in the references/ directory.
Other versions109 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 109
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- CatCatUncle/openworkbuddy★ 375same name
- shawnpang/startup-founder-skills★ 331same name
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- alexsmedile/hormozi-skills★ 208same name
- okikusan-public/stock_skills★ 134same name
- cohen-liel/hivemind★ 108same name
- extruct-ai/gtm-skills★ 108same name
- tpavanipradeep/everything-claude-code★ 104same name
99 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use everything-claude-code, everything-claude-code-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 9 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
InfopibeSkillinvestor-outreach
Draft cold emails, warm intro blurbs, follow-ups, update emails, and investor communications for fundraising. Use when the user wants outreach to angels, VCs, strategic investors, or accelerators and needs concise, personalized, investor-facing messaging.
Also in 22 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillnextjs-turbopack
Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
Also in 14 projects that use this
shawnpangSkillcompetitor-monitoring
When the user wants to set up ongoing tracking of competitor activity — pricing changes, feature launches, hiring signals, content, or public mentions. Also use when the user mentions "track competitors", "what are competitors doing", "competitor alerts", or "market watch".
Also in 3 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +1 more from Infopibe
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- benchmarkingSkill
- change-managementSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- customer-insightsSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- deliverable-creationSkill
- digital-transformationSkill
- financial-analysisSkill
- innovation-strategySkill
- m-and-a-strategySkill
- operations-analysisSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- risk-managementSkill
- strategy-frameworksSkill
- talent-strategySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

