verify
Skill0 starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
How to prove a change works by running the gate, read what each step means, and try behavior with the action CLI. Use when you finish any task, when tool/check.sh fails, or before you tell the person something is done.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SmartStudio/baize-bottheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- YuBan834/vrma-labtheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Ju571nK/lodelinetheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- ericbust/namedroptheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- automagik-si/genietheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- todoist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use instinct-export, instinct-import and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
AviadPSkillrisk-assess
Assess the risk and blast radius of a proposed code change before implementing it. Evaluates CI impact, framework-wide vs localized scope, rollback path, and identifies blindspots. Use when user says "what's the risk", "is this safe", "assess the impact", "risk assess", "blast radius", or before applying framework-wide or CI-affecting changes. Do NOT use for code quality review (use code-quality) or plan validation (use design-validator).
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AaravChadhaSkillsecure
Security review with a confidence gate - a finding exists only with a concrete exploit scenario and a high/medium/low confidence rating; everything else goes to a worth-hardening list, never inflated. Sweeps five surfaces: auth gates, secrets hygiene, injection and unsafe sinks, unsafe deserialization/crypto/transport, and LLM tool-use trust boundaries. Reports only, never fixes. Use when the user asks for a security review or to check vulnerabilities, secrets, or auth.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheKREATORS
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- oven-sh/bun★ 97ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/financial-services-plugins★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- anthropics/claude-quickstarts★ 19ksame name
- NVIDIA-NeMo/Speech★ 19ksame name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibilitySkill
- actionsSkill
- adding-a-featureSkill
- agent-workflowSkill
- app-contextSkill
- approval-and-safetySkill
- backend-proxySkill
- background-workSkill
- build-an-appSkill
- capture-learningsSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- customizing-the-assistantSkill
- delegate-to-agentSkill
- edit-boundariesSkill
- i18n-and-rtlSkill
- model-providersSkill
- performanceSkill
- permissions-and-platformSkill
- read-the-docsSkill
- reliable-mutationsSkill
- routingSkill
- secretsSkill
- state-managementSkill
- storing-dataSkill
- testingSkill
- ui-designSkill
- upgrade-the-frameworkSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Don't load this for choosing which test to write.
- Distinctive: line 43
If you could not run a step (no device, no network), say which one in the report.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify
Don't load this for choosing which test to write; see testing.
Rule
Run tool/check.sh before you say work is done. Work is done only when it ends with All checks passed. Report what it printed, and never report a check you did not run. The gate is the enforcement. flutter analyze does not report the custom lint rules; use dart analyze at the repo root or the gate.
Why
Each rule in this repo has a check, and the checks only protect you if they actually run. A claim without output is a guess.
How
tool/check.sh stops at the first failing step. In order:
- dependencies:
pub getfor the app and each package (on-device included when present). Fails on a badpubspec.yamlor a version conflict. - generate code:
dart run build_runner build(drift, Riverpod). Fails when annotated code does not compile. - schema dump is current: the database schema equals
drift_schemas/. Fails if you changed tables without raisingschemaVersionand dumping (storing-data). - format:
dart formatcheck. Fix withdart format <the files it names>. - analyze:
dart analyze --fatal-infos, which includes the custom lint rules (layer boundaries,ui_calls_actions, hardcoded colors and strings, and so on). Any info fails the gate. - tests:
flutter test, then the core and lints packages withdart test, then the UI package withflutter test(and the on-device package when present). Includes the parity test. - doctor:
dart run flutter_agentify_core:doctor(agent-files, skills, bundled-secrets, migrations, ratchet, doc-links). Run one check with--only <name>. - action smoke check:
set_languageto the default language (the first inkSupportedLanguages), such asdart run tool/action.dart set_language '{"locale":"en"}', proves the registry starts and an action runs.
Reading a failure: find the == step heading above the first error; fix that step only, then rerun the whole gate. Don't "fix" a failing check by loosening it or adding // ignore:; the ratchet counts those and may only go down.
Behavior checks without the UI use the action CLI, which works on a scratch database under .dart_tool/, never the app's data:
dart run tool/action.dart --list
dart run tool/action.dart set_language '{"locale":"fa"}'
dart run tool/action.dart <action_name> '<json>' --approved--list prints the action names (for example create_item, list_items, set_theme_mode, view_screen). Actions that need approval need --approved. For UI changes the gate is not enough: run the app and look at it, or say you did not.
If you could not run a step (no device, no network), say which one in the report.
Anti-patterns
- Saying "tests pass" after running one file.
- Reporting from memory or from an earlier run.
- Skipping the gate because only a doc changed (the doctor checks skills and links).
- Hiding a failure by editing a baseline or a generated file.
Verification
- The last lines of
tool/check.shoutput readAll checks passed.; paste or quote them in your report. test/tool/action_cli_test.dartcovers the CLI itself.
Related skills
testing— writing the tests the gate runsactions— the CLI and action referencestoring-data— when the schema step failsclean-architecture— when a boundary lint fails
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

