mention-radar
Skill20 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Monitor external web and social mentions of the operator's active projects - surface what people are discovering, where they're confused, and where to engage
- Reads credentials
3 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aeonfun/aeonedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- MiroShark/miroshark-aeonword for word, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- aaronjmars/aeonedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- MiroShark/miroshark-aeon★ 20100% same
Edited · 2
- aaronjmars/aeon★ 789100% same
- aeonfun/aeon★ 789100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- aeonSkill
- action-converterSkill
- aeon-doctorSkill
- aeon-updateSkill
- articleSkill
- auto-mergeSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- auto-workflowSkill
- base-mcpSkill
- bd-radarSkill
- canister-auditSkill
- changelogSkill
- competitor-monitorSkill
- cortx-reliabilitySkill
- create-proveSkill
- create-skillSkill
- defi-overviewSkill
- deploy-prototypeSkill
- deploy-uni-hookSkill
- digestSkill
- distribute-tokensSkill
- executor-mcpSkill
- featureSkill
- fetch-tweetsSkill
- finance-district-mcpSkill
- fleet-controlSkill
- floviaSkill
- fork-fleetSkill
- github-filing-registrySkill
- github-monitorSkill
- github-trendingSkill
- glim-mcpSkill
- heartbeatSkill
- higgsfieldSkill
- holdingsSkill
- hunter-22Skill
- idea-forgeSkill
- idea-pipelineSkill
- inbox-triageSkill
- install-skillSkill
- investigation-reportSkill
- last30Skill
- memory-flushSkill
- monitor-polymarketSkill
- narrative-convergenceSkill
- narrative-trackerSkill
- onchain-monitorSkill
- operator-scorecardSkill
- pack-submitSkill
- picks-trackerSkill
- pm-manipulationSkill
- posthog-errorsSkill
- price-alertSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- pr-triageSkill
- remotionSkill
- reply-makerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Read memory/MEMORY.md for current project status.
- Very specific: line 19
Read the last 3 days of memory/logs/ to avoid re-surfacing already-noted mentions.
- Very specific: line 24
If ${var} is set: parse it as a comma-separated list of project names.
- Very specific: line 27
If zero targets can be derived: log MENTION_RADAR_SKIP: no projects configured — set var or add projects to memory/topics/projects.md and …
- Distinctive: line 69
Path C - WebSearch (broader web + X last resort): Always use WebSearch for the non-X surfaces - Reddit, Farcaster, personal blogs, …
- Very specific: line 110
Use QUIET: [project] for any project with zero external mentions this cycle.
- Very specific: line 115
Send via
./notify: if there's anything worth surfacing. - Distinctive: line 131
Don't manufacture urgency.
- Very specific: line 141
Check, don't assume: Read the "Keys set for this run" line in your run notes, never a shell test (those are refused and cost a turn): …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
${var} — Comma-separated project names to track (e.g. "MyApp, my-lib"). If empty, derives targets from MEMORY.md and memory/topics/projects.md.
Read memory/MEMORY.md for current project status. Read the last 3 days of memory/logs/ to avoid re-surfacing already-noted mentions.
Steps
Define the targets.
- If
${var}is set: parse it as a comma-separated list of project names. - Otherwise: scan
memory/MEMORY.md(goals, active topics) andmemory/topics/projects.md(if it exists) for the operator's active projects. A target needs at least a name; collect a site/domain and a GitHubowner/repotoo when known. - Cap at 6 targets — prefer the most active ones.
- If zero targets can be derived: log
MENTION_RADAR_SKIP: no projects configured — set var or add projects to memory/topics/projects.mdand stop. No notification.
For each target, build search terms:
- The exact project name in quotes (e.g.
"MyApp" site:x.com OR site:reddit.com OR site:news.ycombinator.com) - The domain if known (e.g.
"myapp.xyz") - The repo if known (e.g.
site:github.com owner/myapp)
- If
Search for external mentions. X/Twitter is fetched via twitterapi.io (primary); xAI Grok
x_searchis the fallback; the rest of the public web (Reddit, Farcaster, blogs, newsletters, GitHub Discussions, HN, Product Hunt) goes through WebSearch, which is also the last-resort fallback for X itself. Derive the operator's handle fromsoul/SOUL.mdif present (call it$OPERATOR) so you can exclude their own posts.Shell shape. Each Bash call is one allowed command (pipes are fine). The run refuses a call that sets a variable (
FROM_DATE=$(date ...),Q="...",HTTP=$(./secretcurl ...)), usesif/for/whileor[ -n ... ] &&tests, or joins commands with;,&&or||, and each refusal costs a model turn. So get a date with a baredatecall and write the printed value into later commands; write each target's name, domain, repo, the operator handle and the dates into each command literally (the<NAME>,<FROM_DATE>style placeholders in the snippets), jq filters included (a jq$namevariable from--argis refused, and so is a>redirect into a file, so the xAI body is piped straight into./secretcurl ... --data-binary @-); loop over targets by making one call per target; run onejqper call.Get the window dates first, each
dateas its own Bash call:date -u -d '7 days ago' +%Y-%m-%ddate -u +%Y-%m-%dThe first prints FROM_DATE, the second TO_DATE.
Path A - twitterapi.io (primary, X/Twitter mentions). For each target, structured search for other people mentioning the project. See the Fetching contract below. Use a unique tmp filename per target if you loop (e.g.
/tmp/tw-mr-<SLUG>.json).<NAME>/<DOMAIN>/<REPO>come from the target built in step 1, written in literally. Put the date window inside the query withsince:/until:; exclude the operator with-from:.<QUERY>is"<NAME>" -from:<OPERATOR> since:<FROM_DATE> until:<TO_DATE>, thenOR "<DOMAIN>"added when the target has a domain andOR "<REPO>"added when it has a repo (leave each out when empty), all written in literally. One call per target:./secretcurl -s -o /tmp/tw-mr.json -w 'twitterapi http=%{http_code} bytes=%{size_download}\n' --max-time 60 -G "https://api.twitterapi.io/twitter/tweet/advanced_search" \ --data-urlencode 'query=<QUERY>' --data-urlencode "queryType=Latest" \ -H "X-API-Key: {TWITTER_API_KEY}"On
HTTP=200with a non-empty.tweets[], parse and markX_SOURCE=twitterapi. Drop posts by$OPERATORand the project's own accounts if any slipped through:jq -r '.tweets[] | [.id, .author.userName, .text, .url, .createdAt, .likeCount, .retweetCount, .replyCount] | @tsv' /tmp/tw-mr.jsonEngagement counts are exact; permalinks are
.url.createdAtis Twitter-native (Wed Sep 09 20:21:43 +0000 2026); normalize withstrptime("%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %z %Y")before any date compare. advanced_search does not returnauthor.followers- omit follower counts on this path (Path B can supply them).Path B - xAI Grok
x_search(fallback). Only if Path A returned non-2xx / empty / timeout, orTWITTER_API_KEYis unset. See the Fetching contract - set the Bash tooltimeoutto ≥180000, and capture the HTTP status. Use a unique tmp filename per target if you loop (e.g./tmp/xai-mr-<SLUG>.json). Build the body with the prompt inline and every value written into the jq filter literally (a"inside a value becomes\", and reword any'), and pipe it straight into the send:jq -n '{model:"grok-4.7", input:[{role:"user",content:"Search X for posts by OTHER people mentioning the project \"<NAME>\" (also its site <DOMAIN> and repo <REPO> when given), posted between <FROM_DATE> and <TO_DATE>. Exclude posts by the operator @<OPERATOR> and by the accounts of the project itself. For each mention return: @handle, the full post text, date, exact engagement counts (likes, retweets, replies; 0 if unknown), the approximate follower count of the poster if visible, and the direct link https://x.com/handle/status/ID. Prioritize people discovering it for the first time, asking confused questions, hitting friction (setup/docs/missing feature), comparing it to a competitor, or requesting a feature. Return a numbered list; if nobody is talking about it, say so explicitly."}], tools:[{type:"x_search",from_date:"<FROM_DATE>",to_date:"<TO_DATE>"}]}' \ | ./secretcurl -s -o /tmp/xai-mr.json -w '%{http_code}' --max-time 150 -X POST "https://api.x.ai/v1/responses" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer {XAI_API_KEY}" \ --data-binary @-On
HTTP=200with a non-empty body, parse/tmp/xai-mr.jsonwithjq -r '.output[] | select(.type == "message") | .content[] | select(.type == "output_text") | .text'and feed the X mentions into categorization (step 4). RecordX_SOURCE=api.Path C - WebSearch (broader web + X last resort). Always use WebSearch for the non-X surfaces - Reddit, Farcaster, personal blogs, newsletters, GitHub Discussions, HN, Product Hunt:
- Try both brand name and URL variants
- Time-box to last 7 days where the search engine supports it
- Skip results from the operator's own accounts and the project's own repos
WebSearch is also the last-resort fallback for X/Twitter, but only when Paths A and B both truly failed (
key-unset,http-<code>,empty, ortimeout- record the real reason per the Fetching contract, never "XAI_API_KEY unavailable" / "TWITTER_API_KEY unavailable" when a key was set). On the X fallback querysite:x.com "<project name>" after:${FROM_DATE}; note in the log that X results came from WebSearch (lower quality) and setX_SOURCE=websearch.- Also check GitHub network signals for each target with a known repo:
Skip any repo that 404s (private or not yet public). Compare to the last log entry to compute deltas. If no prior data, record as baseline.gh api repos/OWNER/REPO --jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count, watchers: .watchers_count}' - Categorize each mention found:
- Discovery — person found the project for the first time, sharing it, impressed ("this is cool", star notification, share)
- Confusion — person unclear on what it does, asking questions, mischaracterizing it
- Friction — person ran into a problem (setup, docs, missing feature)
- Competitor comparison — mentioned alongside or against a competing project
- Feature request / wish — explicit ask for something missing
- Press / newsletter — cited in a publication or digest
- Identify engagement opportunities. Flag any mention where:
- The person is confused and a 1-tweet clarification would help
- A feature request aligns with what's being built
- A competitor comparison is wrong or incomplete
- A high-follower account discovered the project (high-leverage reply opportunity)
- Format the output (under 4000 chars):
Use*Mention Radar — ${today}* {PROJECT NAME, uppercased} - [source] — [what they said] — [category] ... (one section per target) ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES - [handle/source]: [why worth replying] QUIET: [project] — no external mentions foundQUIET: [project]for any project with zero external mentions this cycle. Skip GitHub-only star delta if it's less than 5 — only mention notable jumps. - Only notify if there's signal. Skip notification if ALL projects are quiet and no GitHub deltas > 5 stars. Log
MENTION_RADAR_QUIETinstead. - Send via
./notifyif there's anything worth surfacing. - Log to memory/logs/${today}.md:
### mention-radar - **{project}:** [N mentions / QUIET] (one line per target) - **Top find:** [best mention in one line, or "none"] - **Engagement opps:** [N flagged, or 0] - **Notification sent:** yes/no
Guidelines
- This is signal filtering, not a metrics report. One real conversation > ten impressions.
- Prioritize quality of mention over quantity. A thoughtful Reddit post or HN comment matters more than a retweet.
- Don't manufacture urgency. If there's nothing worth acting on, say so.
- Be specific — link the source, quote the key line, name the person if identifiable.
- The point is engagement opportunity and awareness, not vanity numbers.
Fetching
TWITTER_API_KEY is injected into your environment for this skill (declared in requires:). The primary fetch path for X/Twitter mentions is a direct curl to https://api.twitterapi.io/twitter/tweet/advanced_search with header X-API-Key: {TWITTER_API_KEY} (step 2, Path A). Grok x_search (XAI_API_KEY) is the fallback. There is no network sandbox blocking this. Just make the call.
You MUST attempt twitterapi.io before any X fallback. The rules:
- Check, don't assume. Read the "Keys set for this run" line in your run notes, never a shell test (those are refused and cost a turn):
TWITTER_API_KEYon that line =KEY_PRESENT, not on it =KEY_UNSET. IfKEY_PRESENT, you are required to try Path A. - Capture the HTTP status so the fallback decision is based on fact. Print
http=<code>before parsing.HTTP=200with a non-empty.tweets[]→ use it (X_SOURCE=twitterapi). Put date windows inside the query withsince:YYYY-MM-DD until:YYYY-MM-DD.createdAtis Twitter-native (Wed Sep 09 20:21:43 +0000 2026), not ISO - normalize withstrptime("%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %z %Y")before any date compare. - Path B - xAI Grok
x_search(fallback). Only when Path A fails (non-2xx / empty / timeout) orTWITTER_API_KEYis unset. Directcurltohttps://api.x.ai/v1/responseswithAuthorization: Bearer {XAI_API_KEY}. Thex_searchcall typically takes 30-120s - set the Bash tooltimeoutto at least 180000 (180s) and keep--max-time 150on the curl. A slow curl is not a missing key. Build the payload with thejq -nfilter shown in step 2 Path B (values written in literally) and pipe it straight into the send - a>redirect into a file is refused, and the./secretcurlcommand must stay 100% literal (no$VAR):
It prints the status code (jq -n '{...}' | ./secretcurl -s -o /tmp/xai-mr.json -w '%{http_code}' --max-time 150 -X POST "https://api.x.ai/v1/responses" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Authorization: Bearer {XAI_API_KEY}" --data-binary @-HTTP);./secretcurlalso prints anhttp=... bytes=...line on stderr. Then parse/tmp/xai-mr.jsonwith the standardjqextractor.HTTP=200with a non-empty body → use it (X_SOURCE=api). - Fall back only on a real failure, and record the true reason - never write "XAI_API_KEY unavailable" / "TWITTER_API_KEY unavailable" when a key was set. Use one of:
key-unset(only if step 1 saidKEY_UNSET),http-<code>(non-2xx),empty(200 but no mentions parsed),timeout(curl exceeded--max-time).
WebSearch / WebFetch are last-resort fallbacks only for X - lower quality (WebSearch favours old high-engagement tweets). They remain the primary tool for the non-X web surfaces (Reddit, HN, blogs, etc.). Never reach for the X WebSearch fallback while a key works.
Environment Variables
TWITTER_API_KEY- twitterapi.io API key (sent as theX-API-Keyheader). Declared inrequires:, so it is injected into this skill's environment and is the primary path for X/Twitter mentions.XAI_API_KEY- X.AI API key for Grok'sx_searchtool. Declared inrequires:(optional?). The fallback path whenTWITTER_API_KEYis unset or twitterapi returns non-2xx / empty / timeout. If both keys are unset, X mentions degrade to the WebSearch fallback at lower quality; the broader-web search is unaffected.ghCLI — pre-authenticated in GitHub Actions; used for the GitHub network-signal check (step 3). Not an env var you set here.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

