agentleFS
a-savena-saven/agent-skills/skills/worktree-graphs/SKILL.md

worktree-graphs

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Check, seed, or repair the CodeGraph index and Graphify graph across a repo's git worktrees. Use when a session is running in a worktree and CodeGraph looks absent or wrong, when the user asks whether the graphs are fresh / "check all worktrees", after creating a worktree (Orca, `git worktree add`, or an agent harness), or when a graph answer disagrees with the code actually on disk. Also covers why a Graphify graph goes stale after `git pull` and how to force a refresh.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Worktree graphs

A repo's code graphs are per-checkout, gitignored build artifacts. A fresh git worktree therefore starts with none — so a session running there silently loses CodeGraph entirely and falls back to grep. graphs fixes that in one command.

Check everything first

graphs status

One row per worktree (main included): branch, CodeGraph state, Graphify state.

ReadingMeans
cg: 5081f/63424n freshindexed, nothing pending — trust it
cg: … +12 pending12 files changed since the last sync — run graphs sync
cg: MISSINGno index here; this session is grep-only — run graphs seed
cg: … BORROWED-INDEXthe danger case: resolving another checkout's index, so answers describe a different branch's code
gf: snapshot(main)read-only architectural graph copied from main — expected in a worktree
gf: own build, 45d oldthis worktree built its own graph (e.g. a post-checkout hook did) and nothing refreshes it
gf: STALE (5 commits behind)main's graph predates HEAD — run graphs sync in main

Fix

graphs seed              # give every worktree that lacks them an index + graph snapshot (free)
graphs sync              # refresh the graphs for the checkout you are in
graphs prune --merged    # reclaim disk from worktrees whose branch is already merged
graphs ensure            # what the SessionStart hook runs: seed if missing, then sync in background

seed reflink-clones main's index (cp -c): 3 copies of a 251 MB database cost 8 KB, measured. It deliberately does not sync — codegraph sync rewrites enough pages to break block sharing and materialise the full file (~300 MB per worktree). So seeding every worktree is free, and only the worktree you actually open pays. graphs prune [--merged] gives the disk back.

What each graph is good for

  • CodeGraph is branch-accurate. Every worktree gets its own index, synced to its own HEAD and working tree, so a symbol that exists only on this branch is found here and is invisible from main. This is the one to trust for "where is X / who calls X".
  • Graphify is an architectural overview (graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.md, cross-app concepts and flows). Its node ids embed the main checkout's absolute path, so re-extracting it inside a worktree would duplicate every node. Worktrees therefore get a read-only snapshot of main's graph and never refresh it locally. That is deliberate: use it for orientation, not for branch-specific claims.

Gotchas worth knowing

  • A worktree created outside a Claude session has no graphs until a session opens there. The SessionStart hook seeds on entry, which is when they are first needed.
  • Hooks in .husky/ can be skipped. A GUI or daemon-launched git worktree add runs with a minimal PATH, so a post-checkout hook guarded on command -v graphify exits silently. graphs resolves tool paths itself instead of trusting PATH.
  • Graphify goes stale after git pull, not after your commits. A sync triggered only by local commits never sees merges you pulled in. graphs compares graphify-out/.synced-sha against HEAD and syncs the whole range.
  • Never point two checkouts at one index. Each worktree owns its database file; sharing one means concurrent writers and answers from the wrong branch.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.