agentleFS
Zwin-uxZwin-ux/kit/.claude/skills/kit-evals/SKILL.md

kit-evals

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run, add to or report Kit's agent evals — the in-repo Kit suite (kit eval), Terminal-Bench via Harbor, a SWE-bench Verified subset and Aider polyglot. Use before claiming the agent got better or worse, when changing the loop, a tool, a prompt or a provider, or before publishing any benchmark number.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No number goes in the README, a PR description or a post without a committed result file in docs/evals/ (date, Kit commit, model id, task …

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Never run a paid benchmark without the owner's go and a --budget.

    line 38

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Kit evals

The plan is docs/PRD.md §13.3; the suite is evals/README.md.

The rule for numbers

No number goes in the README, a PR description or a post without a committed result file in docs/evals/ (date, Kit commit, model id, task set and its pin, pass rate, cost, turns) and a link to the run. Comparisons name the same model, date and task subset for both sides.

Kit suite (kit eval)

  • 33 tasks in evals/tasks/<id>/: files/ (the fixture repo, with a kit.toml gate that is the grader and a [gate.scope] that denies the check files), task.toml (category, expect, prompt) and solution.json (the reference solution as scripted tool calls).
  • kit eval --baseline (no agent: every gate must fail) and kit eval --scripted (every reference solution must pass through kit run --agent kit) run in CI on three OSes. Run both after adding or changing a task.
  • A model run: kit eval --model <id> --budget 0.50 --out docs/evals/<date>-<model>.json. It costs money: the owner's call. Set KIT_HOME to a scratch folder when testing locally so runs stay out of ~/.kit.
  • Adding a task: write the fixture, prompt and solution; the gate must fail on the fixture, pass with the solution, and finish in under 2 minutes. A reference solution that only works with a blanket replace (replace_all over a common word) is a bug: real agents make that mistake, and the gate should catch it.

External benchmarks (manual or weekly, always budget-capped)

  • Terminal-Bench: Harbor (Apache-2.0). uv tool install 'harbor[modal]', run the oracle agent first, then harbor run -d terminal-bench/terminal-bench@<pinned> --agent <kit adapter> --model <id>. Version 4.0 is not comparable with 2.x results.
  • SWE-bench Verified: a fixed 50-task subset, MIT harness, Docker on x86_64 (about 120 GB disk). swebench eval verified -p preds --run-id <id>. A regression check, not a headline (saturated).
  • Aider polyglot: Aider-AI/polyglot-benchmark in Docker via benchmark/docker_build.sh. Use it to compare edit formats.

Never run a paid benchmark without the owner's go and a --budget. Report what ran, what it cost, and what failed, including infrastructure failures.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.