ai-literature-survey
Skill9 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Exhaustive, source-audited literature discovery for AI, CV, NLP, ML, robotics, multimodal, and adjacent research topics. Use when the user asks to survey a rough research idea, find almost all related papers, write or repair related work, position a half-finished paper, trace prior art, build a citation graph, monitor new arXiv/OpenReview papers, or produce a coverage-audited literature review in English or Chinese. Triggers include literature review, related work, prior art search, survey, arXiv/OpenAlex/OpenReview search, paper positioning, 综述, 文献调研, 相关工作, 查全相关论文, 选题调研.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- image-to-editable-ppt-skill/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- autodebugSkill
- autorunSkill
- paper-readSkill
- db-analyzeSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- full-autoSkill
- generate-docsSkill
- gpt-imageSkill
- idea2experimentSkill
- idea2paperSkill
- impeccableSkill
- latex-float-layoutSkill
- mysql-motiondataSkill
- nature-paper-cardSkill
- paperjurySkill
- query-motion-databaseSkill
- research-paper-writingSkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
- sync-ceph-dataSkill
- thesis-reviewSkill
- track-ai-papersSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.