running-tests
Skill517 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Codex adapter for safely executing opencode-swarm tests. Use whenever Codex needs to run focused tests, per-file isolation loops, CI-equivalent validation, test-impact checks, or diagnose failing/truncated test output without stalling the session.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Use this adapter when executing tests in opencode-swarm.
- Very specific: line 19
Use the available shell execution tool for bun --smol test and PowerShell/bash loops.
- Very specific: line 20
Prefer rg and repo scripts to rediscover exact commands from source.
- Very specific: line 22
Do not use broad OpenCode test_runner scopes for repo validation.
- Distinctive: line 25
Default rule: one source file or one explicit test file can be targeted narrowly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Running Tests
Use this adapter when executing tests in opencode-swarm. For writing tests, load $writing-tests instead.
Read, in order:
AGENTS.md.opencode/skills/running-tests/SKILL.md
Codex-specific execution notes:
- Use the available shell execution tool for
bun --smol testand PowerShell/bash loops. - Prefer
rgand repo scripts to rediscover exact commands from source. - Capture long output to a temp file when needed and report the important tail or failure lines.
- Do not use broad OpenCode
test_runnerscopes for repo validation. - On Windows, if Bun reports
EPERMafter a forced dependency refresh, rerun the same focused command with approved/elevated access before treating it as a test failure.
Default rule: one source file or one explicit test file can be targeted narrowly; multiple files or directories should use shell loops or the documented tier commands.
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 517100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- NangoHQ/nango★ 13ksame name
- dotnet/winforms★ 4.9ksame name
- stellar/stellar-core★ 3.3ksame name
- openai/openai-dotnet★ 2.7ksame name
- cuthbertLab/music21★ 2.6ksame name
- aiidateam/aiida-core★ 605same name
- DataDog/browser-sdk★ 400same name
- Luqueee/kivgraph★ 21same name
- codeverbojan/claude-code-kickstart★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ci-fix-monitorSkill
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- contributingSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- guardrail-patternsSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- mock-to-internals-migrationSkill
- pr-review-fixSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- subprocess-safetySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarmSkill
- tech-debt-ci-reviewSkill
- test-file-splitSkill
- unswarmSkill
- writing-testsSkill
- brainstormSkill
- clarifySkill
- clarify-specSkill
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- consultSkill
- councilSkill
- critic-gateSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- design-docsSkill
- discoverSkill
- durable-session-stateSkill
- editing-skillsSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- executeSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- graphifySkill
- issue-ingestSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- orchestrating-subagentsSkill
- phase-wrapSkill
- pre-phase-briefingSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- rust-crate-ciSkill
- specifySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-planSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarm-resumeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

