agentleFS
YujxZJCNYujxZJCN/teaching-skills/course-publisher/SKILL.md

course-publisher

Skill34 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Student-facing communication and packaging for university professors, derived entirely from the Course Passport. 4-agent team drafting one-off announcements, weekly emails, a static course website, LMS upload packages, and a living FAQ — every date, weight, and policy traces to a passport field, and everything ships as a draft the professor publishes. Triggers on: announcement, weekly email, course website, course page, LMS, Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, post materials, publish course, student FAQ, 课程通知, 周报, 课程网站, 课程主页, 学习平台, 发布课件, 课程公告, 常见问题.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Facts from the passport only: Every date, weight, room, and policy line in a communication traces to a passport field or explicit professor …

    line 98

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Course Publisher — Student Communications & Packaging Team

Drafts and packages everything students receive about a course — announcements, the weekly email, the course website, LMS upload structures, the FAQ — by compiling it from the Course Passport (shared/course_passport_schema.md). This is the highest-volume, lowest-judgment work in a teaching term: it derives mechanically from decisions the professor already made, which makes it ideal to delegate — and dangerous only if the delegate invents facts. So this skill never does.

Prime rule: the passport is the only source of facts. A date, weight, room number, or policy that is not in the passport or the professor's input appears as [NEEDS PROFESSOR INPUT: ...] — shipped visibly, never guessed. A plausible wrong date in a student email does more damage than a visible gap.

Quick Start

Draft an announcement: Thursday's lecture moves to room B204
Write this week's email for my course — it's week 6
Build a course website from my passport
Package weeks 1–4 for Canvas upload
学生总在问迟交政策,帮我整理一个常见问题页
帮我起草下周的课程周报

Modes

ModeTrigger intentOutput
announcementOne-off message to the class: schedule change, exam logistics, reminderSingle-topic announcement draft, action-first structure
weekly-email"This week's email", week-N update, 周报Week-N email from passport schedule + calendar position: what's due, what's next, what to prepare
course-site"Course website", course page, 课程主页Static site from the passport: syllabus page, schedule table, materials index from artifacts[], policies — plain HTML/Markdown for any static host or LMS pages
lms-package"Get this into Canvas/Moodle/Blackboard", post materials, 发布课件Upload-ready folder structure with naming conventions + per-LMS upload checklist (the skill cannot access the LMS and says so plainly)
faqRecurring student questions, 常见问题Living FAQ: professor pastes the questions, answers drafted FROM passport facts; policy gaps flagged back to course-designer

Mode dispatch rule: a request mixing several topics ("announce the room change and remind them about the quiz and the project") → split into separate announcement drafts, or fold into the next weekly-email if none is urgent — one message, one topic. Detect intent in any language.

Does NOT trigger

ScenarioUse instead
Writing to an individual student (feedback, intervention, difficult email)student-mentor
Building the materials themselves — lessons, slides, activity sheetslesson-builder / deck-studio
Writing or changing syllabus content, outcomes, or policiescourse-designer

Agent Team (4)

AgentRole
announcement_writer_agentOne-off announcements: action-first, one topic each, urgency-calibrated subject lines, professor's voice; bad news leads with the change
site_builder_agentStatic course website built from the passport; single-source discipline (renders policy text, never restates it); rebuild-on-passport-change
lms_packager_agentUpload-ready packaging: folder/naming conventions, week-aligned structure, upload checklist per LMS; verifies completeness against artifacts[]; never claims to have uploaded
comms_planner_agentSemester communication calendar derived from the passport: lead-time rules, planned-vs-sent tracking, gap flags at the weekly checkpoint; never auto-sends

Workflow (weekly-email mode)

Phase 0  ORIENT      — read passport schedule + stored term calendar; confirm week N
                       (calendar never invented — Pipeline Iron Rule 5)
Phase 1  ASSEMBLE    — week-N facts from the passport: assessments due, upcoming
                       deadlines, what to prepare for next week, changes since last week
Phase 2  PLAN-CHECK  — comms_planner cross-checks the semester comms calendar: nothing
                       announced late (exam logistics ≥2 weeks out, changes ASAP);
                       overdue items folded into this email or flagged
Phase 3  DRAFT       — fill `templates/weekly_email_template.md` in the professor's
                       established voice (calibrated from prior emails when available)
Phase 4  CONSISTENCY — every shared fact cross-checked against the site and syllabus;
                       a contradiction with the syllabus is a BLOCK-grade flag
         🧑 checkpoint: draft + fact-trace presented; the professor sends — this skill
            never does (Checkpoint Protocol: student-facing outputs never auto-finalize)

announcement mode runs the same Phases 2–4 over a single topic. course-site and lms-package are build modes: assemble from the passport, verify against artifacts[], 🧑 checkpoint before anything is treated as publishable. faq mode drafts answers only where the passport answers the question; a question the passport cannot answer is a policy gap, routed to course-designer rather than improvised here.

Iron rules

  1. Facts from the passport only. Every date, weight, room, and policy line in a communication traces to a passport field or explicit professor input. [NEEDS PROFESSOR INPUT: ...] ships visibly in the draft rather than being guessed — a gap the professor can see beats a fabrication students will quote back.
  2. Draft-only. This skill never sends, posts, publishes, or uploads. Every output ends with a review-and-publish-yourself note, non-removable by configuration.
  3. Consistency is checked, not hoped. Each artifact regenerated cross-checks the facts it shares with the site, the syllabus, and prior communications. Drift between channels — the defect this skill exists to prevent — is reported per fact; a contradiction with the syllabus is a BLOCK-grade flag resolved before the checkpoint closes.
  4. No surveillance framing. Announcements never name-and-shame and never generate "many of you still haven't…" guilt mechanically. If the professor asks for that register, flag once (Quality Gate I2 spirit); their call wins, with the reason logged.
  5. Accessibility by default. Web and email output use semantic headings, real link text, alt text for images, and tables that survive a phone screen — Quality Gate U1 applied to everything student-facing this skill produces.

Outputs

  • comms/announcement_<topic>.md, comms/week_<N>_email.md — drafts from templates/weekly_email_template.md, each with its fact-trace block
  • site/ — static course website per templates/course_site_structure.md
  • lms_package/ — upload-ready structure + upload_checklist.md. For an importable package (not just a zip), run scripts/export_lms.py --to imscc to build an IMS Common Cartridge (.imscc) that Canvas/Moodle/Blackboard import directly; render the syllabus and handouts to DOCX/PDF with scripts/render_document.py
  • comms/faq.md — living FAQ, with policy gaps listed for course-designer
  • comms/comms_calendar.md — planned vs sent, maintained by comms_planner_agent

References

  • references/student_comms_guide.md — action-first anatomy, subject conventions, tone calibration, bad-news patterns, accessibility rules
  • templates/weekly_email_template.md
  • templates/course_site_structure.md
  • Shared: shared/course_passport_schema.md, shared/checkpoint_protocol.md, shared/quality_gate_protocol.md, shared/pedagogy_foundations.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.