observability
Skill181 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Logs AI thoughts and decisions for human observability. Applies continuously throughout all tasks to maintain transparency.
87 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ingvord/legendary-bassoontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sundaram2021/claude-code-observability-systemtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mehul72/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use gitops, background-jobs and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
kcns008Skillgitops
GitOps Agent (Flow) — manages ArgoCD applications, Helm charts, Kustomize overlays, deployment strategies (canary, blue-green, rolling), multi-cluster GitOps, and drift detection for Kubernetes and OpenShift clusters.
Also in 4 projects that use this
YepAPISkillbackground-jobs
Queue workers with BullMQ/Inngest/Trigger.dev, job retries, dead letter queues, concurrency.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Mushfiqur-Rahman-RobinSkillrag-systems
Best practices for building Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems — chunking, embedding, hybrid retrieval, reranking, indexing, caching, evaluation, observability — plus a catalog of RAG patterns and when each applies.
Also in 3 projects that use this
YepAPISkilldata-pipelines
ETL patterns, cron scheduling, queue-based processing, and batch jobs with Inngest/BullMQ.
Also in 4 projects that use this
wpankSkillcaching
Caching strategies, invalidation, eviction policies, HTTP caching, distributed caching, and anti-patterns. Use when designing cache layers, choosing eviction policies, debugging stale data, or optimizing read-heavy workloads.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JohnJBorenSkillci-cd
CI/CD pipeline design, GitHub Actions, testing automation, and deployment strategies
Also in 13 projects that use this
Other versions87 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 87
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- BuilderIO/agent-native★ 7.6ksame name
- brianlovin/briOS★ 2.3ksame name
- lablup/backend.ai★ 679same name
- DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills★ 216same name
- kid-sid/claude-spellbook★ 190same name
- proyecto26/system-design-skills★ 118same name
- TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft★ 108same name
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84same name
- nitinjain999/platform-skills★ 71same name
77 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectSkill
- doc-reviewSkill
- god-consensusSkill
- god-interventionSkill
- god-memberSkill
- parallel-exploreSkill
- plan-reviewSkill
- prd-converterSkill
- prdSkill
- researchSkill
- roadmapSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- vision-builderSkill
- visionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 70 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
When running in workspace mode, log to .aha-loop/logs/ai-thoughts.md instead of logs/ai-thoughts.md.
- Distinctive: line 21
Create anchors for humans to understand what's happening
- Distinctive: line 22
Never hide failures or uncertainty
- Distinctive: line 31
Major decisions: - When choosing between approaches
- Distinctive: line 139
When things go wrong:
- Distinctive: line 153
Don't hide uncertainty
- Distinctive: line 154
Don't pretend to know what you don't
- Distinctive: line 159
Avoid jargon without explanation
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 70 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability Skill
Maintain transparent, human-readable logs of AI decision-making process.
Workspace Mode Note
When running in workspace mode, log to .aha-loop/logs/ai-thoughts.md instead of logs/ai-thoughts.md.
The orchestrator will provide the actual paths in the prompt context.
The Job
- Log significant thoughts and decisions to
logs/ai-thoughts.md - Provide visibility into AI reasoning process
- Create anchors for humans to understand what's happening
- Never hide failures or uncertainty
When to Log
Always Log
- Starting a new task - What am I about to do and why
- Major decisions - When choosing between approaches
- Unexpected findings - Something surprising or important
- Errors and recovery - What went wrong and how I'm handling it
- Completion - What was accomplished
Optional Log (Detailed Level)
- Intermediate steps
- Research findings
- Minor decisions
- Progress updates
Log Format
Append to logs/ai-thoughts.md:
## 2026-01-29 14:30:00 | Task: PRD-003 | Phase: Research
### Context
I'm researching authentication strategies for the web app. This is critical
because it affects security architecture and user experience.
### Inner Thoughts
The vision mentions "simple" and "quick to use". Traditional username/password
might add friction. Considering passwordless options but need to evaluate
complexity tradeoffs.
### Decision Point
- Considering: Traditional email/password
- Considering: Magic link (passwordless)
- Considering: OAuth only (Google/GitHub)
- **Chosen:** Magic link with OAuth fallback
- **Reason:** Aligns with "simple" goal, reduces password fatigue,
OAuth provides familiar alternative
### Current Progress
- [x] Read vision requirements
- [x] Research auth options
- [ ] Prototype magic link flow
- [ ] Evaluate email service options
### Observations
- Magic link requires reliable email delivery
- Need to consider rate limiting to prevent abuse
- Session duration is important for UX
### Next Action
Will research email service providers (Resend, SendGrid) and evaluate
their free tiers since budget constraint mentioned "no paid APIs".
---Log Levels
Configure in config.json:
Minimal
- Task start/end only
- Major errors
Normal (Default)
- All major decisions
- Phase transitions
- Errors and recovery
Detailed
- Everything above
- Intermediate thoughts
- Research notes
- Minor decisions
Thought Categories
Inner Monologue
Express your actual reasoning:
- "I'm uncertain about X because..."
- "This seems risky because..."
- "I'm choosing Y over Z because..."
- "I notice that..."
Decision Points
When facing choices:
### Decision Point
- Considering: [Option A] - [pros/cons]
- Considering: [Option B] - [pros/cons]
- **Chosen:** [Option]
- **Reason:** [Why]
- **Tradeoffs:** [What we're giving up]Uncertainty
Be honest about what you don't know:
### Uncertainty
I'm not 100% sure about [X]. My current assumption is [Y] because [Z].
If this proves wrong, I'll need to [fallback plan].Errors
When things go wrong:
### Error Encountered
**What happened:** [Description]
**Why:** [Root cause if known]
**Impact:** [What this affects]
**Recovery:** [How I'm handling it]Principles
Be Transparent
- Don't hide uncertainty
- Don't pretend to know what you don't
- Admit mistakes openly
Be Useful
- Logs should help humans understand
- Avoid jargon without explanation
- Provide context
Be Honest
- Express genuine reasoning, not performance
- Include doubts and concerns
- Note when guessing vs. knowing
Be Concise
- Important details only
- No filler text
- Structured for scanning
Integration
At Task Start
## [timestamp] | Task: [id] | Phase: Starting
### Context
[What I'm about to do]
### Approach
[How I plan to tackle it]
### Potential Concerns
[What might go wrong]At Decision Points
### Decision Point
[Structured decision format]At Task End
## [timestamp] | Task: [id] | Phase: Complete
### Summary
[What was accomplished]
### Key Decisions Made
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
### Learnings
[What I learned that might be useful later]
### Concerns for Future
[Any issues to watch for]Example: Full Task Log
## 2026-01-29 10:00:00 | Task: PRD-001 | Phase: Starting
### Context
Beginning the project scaffolding PRD. This sets up the foundation for
the entire project, so I need to be careful about initial decisions.
### Approach
1. First, review the architecture document for tech stack
2. Initialize the project with chosen tools
3. Set up basic structure
4. Configure development environment
### Potential Concerns
- Version compatibility between dependencies
- Getting the directory structure right from the start
---
## 2026-01-29 10:15:00 | Task: PRD-001 | Phase: Research
### Inner Thoughts
The architecture specifies Rust + Axum. I should verify I'm using the
latest stable versions. Let me check crates.io...
### Observations
- Axum 0.7.4 is latest (released 2 weeks ago, stable)
- Tokio 1.35 is latest
- Should use workspace structure for future modularity
---
## 2026-01-29 10:30:00 | Task: PRD-001 | Phase: Implementation
### Decision Point
- Considering: Single crate structure
- Considering: Workspace with multiple crates
- **Chosen:** Workspace structure
- **Reason:** Project will likely grow, easier to refactor now than later
### Progress
- [x] Created Cargo.toml with workspace
- [x] Added main crate
- [ ] Add configuration
- [ ] Add basic error handling
---
## 2026-01-29 11:00:00 | Task: PRD-001 | Phase: Complete
### Summary
Successfully set up Rust project with Axum 0.7.4, configured workspace,
added basic structure with src/main.rs entry point.
### Key Decisions Made
- Workspace structure for scalability
- Tokio multi-threaded runtime
- Tracing for logging
### Learnings
- Axum 0.7 changed some APIs from 0.6, needed to use new Router syntax
### Files Created
- Cargo.toml
- src/main.rs
- src/lib.rs
---Mindset
You are thinking out loud for human benefit.
Your logs should read like a competent colleague explaining their work:
- Clear reasoning
- Honest about uncertainty
- Proactive about potential issues
- Documenting for future reference
Remember: Humans will read these logs to understand what you did and why. Make their job easy.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

