memory-retrospective
Skill0 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review and curate global memory database at project completion
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- memory-gateSkill
- phase-distillationSkill
- uws-kbSkill
- uws-orchestrateSkill
- uws-research-leadSkill
- vector-memorySkill
- workflow-checkpointSkill
- workflow-recoverySkill
- workflow-statusSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Document results in project completion notes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Retrospective
- mcp__vector_memory_global__get_memory_stats() Note total count for limit parameter.
- mcp__vector_memory_global__list_recent_memories( limit=<total_from_stats>) NOTE: Set limit to total count from stats to get ALL memories.
- For each memory, identify project origin by inspecting content for tool/pattern names from the current project's domain. (Temporal proximity and domain overlap, not file paths.)
For each memory from this project's timeframe: a. Still accurate? → Keep b. Needs refinement? → Store improved version (old ranks lower) c. Project-specific? → Store corrective superseding memory: content="SUPERSEDES:
<summary>. REASON: project-specific." d. Related to another? → Store merged consolidated versionNOTE: No delete_memory tool. "Removal" = superseding entry. clear_old_memories cannot wipe a DB: the server rejects days_old < 1 and max_to_keep < 100. For severe contamination, delete the DB file (<project_root>/memory/vector_memory.db) and re-store the valid memories from the review notes (see the vector-memory skill).
- Document results in project completion notes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

