agentleFS
XinvtechXinvtech/mobile-design-os/skills/mobile-platform-guidelines/SKILL.md

mobile-platform-guidelines

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Apply and review iOS and Android native behavior rules across navigation, insets, permissions, system surfaces, accessibility, adaptive layouts, lifecycle, and platform-specific interaction. Use when Codex needs a platform decision, a cross-platform parity review, a guideline checklist, or a device-validation plan for mobile UX/UI.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    iOS: use the iOS reference and check navigation, safe areas, Dynamic Type, VoiceOver, Reduce Motion, keyboard, permissions, and system …

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Android: use the Android reference and check predictive Back, edge-to-edge insets, scalable text, TalkBack, adaptive layouts, process …

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Read the existing first-party references before making a claim:

    line 16
  4. Very specific:

    Run python3 scripts/validate_platform_guidelines.py <path-to-platform-guidelines.json> and fix structural errors.

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not label a design “native” from visual resemblance alone.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Mobile Platform Guidelines

Turn platform knowledge into explicit product decisions and testable checks. Preserve outcome parity while allowing implementation and interaction differences between iOS and Android.

Select the platform mode

  • iOS: use the iOS reference and check navigation, safe areas, Dynamic Type, VoiceOver, Reduce Motion, keyboard, permissions, and system surfaces.
  • Android: use the Android reference and check predictive Back, edge-to-edge insets, scalable text, TalkBack, adaptive layouts, process recreation, and Material/custom behavior.
  • Cross-platform: review shared user outcomes and record where behavior must diverge.

Read the existing first-party references before making a claim:

  • iOS patterns
  • Android patterns
  • UX platform rules
  • UI platform rules

For products whose core value depends on device motion, audio, or haptics, also read sensor, audio, and haptic behavior. Treat hardware availability, permission, interruption, route change, and a visible non-sensor alternative as required product states.

Recheck the linked official documentation before version-specific claims. Record the documentation date, OS/version scope, and whether a conclusion is observed, derived, or not-tested.

Run the review

  1. Establish target OS versions, form factors, input modes, appearance, text-size settings, and relevant system integrations.
  2. Map each platform rule to a screen, state, flow, component, or system surface.
  3. Separate product outcome parity from implementation parity; do not force identical navigation or permission behavior.
  4. Mark each check pass, fail, not-tested, or not-applicable. A screenshot can support visible layout evidence but cannot prove runtime semantics.
  5. Give every failure an owner, workaround/fallback, and verification method.

Create:

  • platform-review.md using assets/platform-review-template.md.
  • platform-guidelines.json using assets/platform-guidelines-template.json and references/platform-guidelines-schema.md.

Run python3 scripts/validate_platform_guidelines.py <path-to-platform-guidelines.json> and fix structural errors. Keep runtime checks untested until a device or executable prototype supplies evidence.

Enforce the output order

  1. Platform scope and source freshness.
  2. Outcome-parity contract.
  3. Rule/check matrix by platform and area.
  4. Fallbacks, risks, and device test plan.
  5. Decision, open questions, and confidence.

Do not label a design “native” from visual resemblance alone.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.