competitive-intel
Skill15 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".
- Reads credentials
- Installs packages
19 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- memi-design/design-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Hyde-and-Larkin/product-marketing-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hassanzouhar/market_analyticstheir own version, first seen Sep 24, 2026
- CyranoB/web-foragertheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pricing-strategy.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
silvainfmSkillpricing-strategy
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Aditya923-c/xpoz-agent-skills★ 697% same
Wrote their own version · 18
- Natan-Mohart/24-strategy-skills-for-claude★ 41same name
- MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli★ 33same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- CyranoB/web-forager★ 10same name
- memi-design/design-skills★ 7same name
- RizwanZafaris/product-manager-OS★ 4same name
- saberapp/skills★ 4same name
- Hussain-Elfalah/Agentic-Skills★ 2same name
- Hyde-and-Larkin/product-marketing-toolkit★ 2same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-answer-traceSkill
- creator-authenticity-scoreSkill
- geo-redditSkill
- geo-visibility-checkSkill
- influencer-discoverySkill
- lead-gen-scanSkill
- reddit-researchSkill
- security-osintSkill
- social-sentiment-analyzerSkill
- twitter-data-exportSkill
- xpoz-best-practicesSkill
- xpoz-getting-startedSkill
- xpoz-social-trackingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Before fetching data, ensure Xpoz access is configured.
- Distinctive: line 35
If this succeeds without error → skip to Step 1.
- Distinctive: line 37
If neither works, you need to authenticate.
- Very specific: line 49
If mcporter is available:
- Very specific: line 55
If hasAccessKey: true → ready.
- Distinctive: line 116
Step 3: WAIT for the user to reply with the code: Do not proceed until they respond.
- Distinctive: line 230
Run parallel searches — one per brand, per platform.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitive Intelligence
Overview
Compare multiple brands or products side by side across Twitter/X, Reddit, and Instagram. Measure share of voice, compare sentiment, identify positioning differences, and discover competitive advantages from real social conversations.
When to Use
Activate when the user asks:
- "Compare [BRAND A] vs [BRAND B] on social media"
- "Share of voice: [BRAND] vs competitors"
- "Competitive analysis for [PRODUCT]"
- "How does [BRAND A] sentiment compare to [BRAND B]?"
- "What are people saying about [BRAND] vs [COMPETITOR]?"
Setup & Authentication
Before fetching data, ensure Xpoz access is configured. Follow these checks in order.
Check 1: Already authenticated?
If you have MCP tools, try calling any Xpoz tool (e.g., checkAccessKeyStatus). If it works → skip to Step 1.
If you have the SDK, try:
from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient() # reads XPOZ_API_KEY env varIf this succeeds without error → skip to Step 1.
If neither works, you need to authenticate. Get a free access key (below).
Recommended: a free access key
Real analyses need a real key: get a free access key (free tier, up to 75K results, no credit card). SDK and CLI users set it as XPOZ_API_KEY; MCP connections sign in with the same account via OAuth on first tool call (paths below).
Path A: MCP via mcporter (OpenClaw agents)
If mcporter is available:
mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatusIf hasAccessKey: true → ready. If not:
mcporter config add xpoz https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp --auth oauthThen authenticate — generate the OAuth URL and send it to the user:
Step 1: Generate authorization URL
import secrets, hashlib, base64, urllib.parse, json, urllib.request, os
verifier = secrets.token_urlsafe(64)
challenge = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(hashlib.sha256(verifier.encode()).digest()).rstrip(b'=').decode()
state = secrets.token_urlsafe(32)
# Dynamic client registration
reg_req = urllib.request.Request(
'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/register',
data=json.dumps({
'client_name': 'Agent Skills',
'redirect_uris': ['https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'],
'grant_types': ['authorization_code'],
'response_types': ['code'],
'token_endpoint_auth_method': 'none',
}).encode(),
headers={'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
)
reg_resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(reg_req).read())
params = urllib.parse.urlencode({
'response_type': 'code',
'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
'code_challenge': challenge,
'code_challenge_method': 'S256',
'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw',
'state': state,
'scope': 'mcp:tools',
'resource': 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/',
})
auth_url = 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/authorize?' + params
# Save state for token exchange
os.makedirs(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth'), exist_ok=True)
with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'), 'w') as f:
json.dump({'verifier': verifier, 'state': state, 'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'}, f)
print(auth_url)Step 2: Send the URL to the user
Tell them:
"I need to connect to Xpoz for social media data. Please open this link and sign in:
[auth_url]
After authorizing, you'll see a code. Paste it back to me here."
Step 3: WAIT for the user to reply with the code. Do not proceed until they respond.
Step 4: Exchange the code for a token
Once the user provides the code (either a raw code or a URL containing ?code=...), extract the code and exchange it:
import json, urllib.request, urllib.parse, subprocess, os
with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json')) as f:
oauth = json.load(f)
code = "THE_CODE_FROM_USER" # Extract from user's reply
data = urllib.parse.urlencode({
'grant_type': 'authorization_code',
'code': code,
'redirect_uri': oauth['redirect_uri'],
'client_id': oauth['client_id'],
'code_verifier': oauth['verifier'],
}).encode()
req = urllib.request.Request(
'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/token',
data=data,
headers={'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},
)
resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
token = resp['access_token']
# Configure mcporter with the token (token is never printed)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'remove', 'xpoz'], capture_output=True)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'add', 'xpoz', 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp',
'--header', f'Authorization=Bearer {token}'], check=True)
# Clean up
os.remove(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'))
print("Xpoz configured successfully")Step 5: Verify with mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatus → should return hasAccessKey: true.
Path B: MCP via Claude Code
For Claude Code users without mcporter:
claude mcp add --transport http xpoz https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcpClaude Code handles OAuth automatically on first tool call — the user just needs to authorize in their browser when prompted.
Path C: SDK (Python or TypeScript)
Ask the user:
"I need a Xpoz API key to access social media data. Please go to https://xpoz.ai/get-token (it's free, no credit card needed) and paste the key back to me."
WAIT for the user to reply with the key. Then:
Python:
pip install xpozfrom xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient("THE_KEY_FROM_USER")TypeScript:
npm install @xpoz/xpozimport { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";
const client = new XpozClient({ apiKey: "THE_KEY_FROM_USER" });
await client.connect();Or set the environment variable and use the default constructor:
export XPOZ_API_KEY=THE_KEY_FROM_USERAuth Errors
| Problem | Solution |
| MCP: "Unauthorized" | Re-run the OAuth flow above |
SDK: AuthenticationError | Verify key at xpoz.ai/settings |
| Token exchange fails | Ask user to re-authorize — codes are single-use |
Step-by-Step Instructions
Step 1: Parse the Request
Extract:
- Primary brand and competitors (2-5 brands total)
- Platforms (default: Twitter + Reddit)
- Time period (default: last 7 days)
- Industry context for better analysis
Build expanded queries for each brand:
"Slack"→"Slack" NOT "cut some slack" NOT "slack off""Discord"→"Discord" NOT "sow discord" NOT "discord between"- For stocks: include ticker symbols
Step 2: Fetch Data for Each Brand
Run parallel searches — one per brand, per platform.
Via MCP
For each brand, call:
Twitter posts:
Call getTwitterPostsByKeywords:
query: "<brand query>"
fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "createdAtDate", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "impressionCount"]
startDate: "<7 days ago>"
endDate: "<today>"
language: "en"Twitter users discussing the brand:
Call getTwitterUsersByKeywords:
query: "<brand query>"
fields: ["id", "username", "name", "followersCount", "relevantTweetsCount", "relevantTweetsLikesSum"]
startDate: "<7 days ago>"Reddit (for each brand):
Call getRedditPostsByKeywords:
query: "<brand query>"
fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit", "createdAtDate"]
startDate: "<7 days ago>"CRITICAL: Each call returns an operationId — poll checkOperationStatus until "completed".
Tip: Launch all brand searches in sequence, collect all operationIds, then poll them. This is faster than waiting for each one.
Via Python SDK
from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient()
brands = {
"Slack": '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
"Discord": '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
"Teams": '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
}
brand_data = {}
for brand_name, query in brands.items():
# Twitter posts
twitter = client.twitter.search_posts(
query,
start_date="2026-02-16",
end_date="2026-02-23",
language="en",
fields=["id", "text", "author_username", "like_count", "retweet_count", "impression_count", "created_at_date"]
)
# Twitter users (for influencer overlap analysis)
users = client.twitter.get_users_by_keywords(
query,
start_date="2026-02-16",
fields=["username", "followers_count", "relevant_tweets_count", "relevant_tweets_likes_sum"]
)
# Reddit posts
reddit = client.reddit.search_posts(
query,
start_date="2026-02-16",
fields=["id", "title", "text", "score", "num_comments", "subreddit", "created_at_date"]
)
brand_data[brand_name] = {
"twitter_posts": twitter,
"twitter_users": users,
"reddit_posts": reddit,
"tweet_count": twitter.pagination.total_rows,
"reddit_count": reddit.pagination.total_rows,
}
client.close()Via TypeScript SDK
import { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";
const client = new XpozClient();
await client.connect();
const brands: Record<string, string> = {
Slack: '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
Discord: '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
Teams: '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
};
const brandData: Record<string, any> = {};
for (const [name, query] of Object.entries(brands)) {
const twitter = await client.twitter.searchPosts(query, {
startDate: "2026-02-16",
endDate: "2026-02-23",
language: "en",
fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "createdAtDate"],
});
const reddit = await client.reddit.searchPosts(query, {
startDate: "2026-02-16",
fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit"],
});
brandData[name] = { twitter, reddit };
}
await client.close();Step 3: Analyze and Compare
Share of Voice (SOV):
SOV for Brand A = (Brand A mentions) / (Total mentions across all brands) × 100Calculate separately for Twitter and Reddit.
Sentiment Comparison: For each brand, classify posts into positive/neutral/negative (see social-sentiment-analyzer skill for classification method) and compare:
- Overall sentiment score (0-100)
- Positive/negative ratio
- Sentiment trend over the time period
Engagement Comparison:
- Average likes per post
- Average comments/replies per post
- Total impressions (Twitter)
- Total Reddit score
Audience Overlap:
- Find users who posted about multiple brands (common usernames across datasets)
- These users are particularly valuable for understanding switching behavior
Positioning Analysis:
- What attributes does each brand's audience associate with it?
- What are the unique strengths/weaknesses mentioned for each?
- Common comparison contexts ("I switched from X to Y because...")
Step 4: Generate Report
## Competitive Intelligence: [BRAND] vs Competitors
**Period:** [date range] | **Platforms:** Twitter, Reddit
### Share of Voice
| Brand | Twitter Posts | Reddit Posts | Total | SOV |
|-------|-------------|-------------|-------|-----|
| Slack | 1,234 | 456 | 1,690 | 42% |
| Discord | 890 | 678 | 1,568 | 39% |
| Teams | 456 | 321 | 777 | 19% |
### Sentiment Comparison
| Brand | Score | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Trend |
|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------|-------|
| Slack | 62 | 38% | 42% | 20% | → Stable |
| Discord | 71 | 48% | 35% | 17% | ↑ Improving |
| Teams | 45 | 22% | 45% | 33% | ↓ Declining |
### Engagement Comparison
| Brand | Avg Likes (Twitter) | Avg Score (Reddit) | Avg Comments |
|-------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
### Key Findings
#### [Brand A] Strengths
- [What people praise, with example quotes]
#### [Brand A] Weaknesses
- [What people complain about, with example quotes]
#### [Brand B] Strengths / Weaknesses
...
### Competitive Positioning Map
- **[Brand A]:** Positioned as [description]
- **[Brand B]:** Positioned as [description]
- **Switching signals:** [users switching from X to Y, with reasons]
### Audience Overlap
[X users posted about multiple brands — analysis of their preferences]
### Recommendations
[3-5 actionable insights based on the competitive landscape]Example Prompts
- "Compare Tesla vs Rivian vs Lucid on Twitter sentiment"
- "Share of voice: Figma vs Sketch vs Adobe XD"
- "Competitive analysis for Notion vs Obsidian vs Roam Research on Reddit"
- "How does Claude sentiment compare to ChatGPT and Gemini?"
Notes
- Expand brand names carefully to avoid false positives (common words need exclusions)
- Reddit provides qualitative depth; Twitter provides quantitative breadth
- Free access key: up to 75K results at xpoz.ai (no credit card); real runs need it
- For large comparisons (5+ brands), use CSV exports and analyze locally with pandas/Excel
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

