skills
AGENTS.md1 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Combine with project-specific rules. Favor caution over speed; use judgment for trivial tasks. Odyssey: RULE names a rule; WHEN limits scope; MUST requires, MUST_NOT forbids, PREFER favors. Lists apply item by item; this file's authority/scope are unchanged.
Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.
Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- agi-modeSkill
- apply-code-reviewSkill
- apply-doc-reviewSkill
- apply-ui-reviewSkill
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- clean-artifactsSkill
- crd-respondSkill
- crdSkill
- create-e2e-verification-skillSkill
- debuggingSkill
- design-mdSkill
- design-referenceSkill
- dev-planSkill
- documentation-writerSkill
- elintpSkill
- experience-captureSkill
- feature-demoSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- gdpr-compliantSkill
- howSkill
- humanize-writingSkill
- kpi-dashboard-designSkill
- landing-page-conversion-auditSkill
- mcp-release-qaSkill
- meeting-minutesSkill
- optimize-agents-mdSkill
- pardonSkill
- phoenix-diagramSkill
- phoenix-uiSkill
- portal-app-exchangeSkill
- portal-app-initSkill
- portal-dev-setupSkill
- portal-external-appSkill
- portal-loggingSkill
- portal-micro-appSkill
- prdSkill
- reactSkill
- reflectSkill
- resolve-blockedSkill
- review-codeSkill
- review-dev-planSkill
- review-prd-dev-gapsSkill
- review-prdSkill
- review-uiSkill
- rust-portSkill
- rust-reviewSkill
- rustSkill
- security-auditSkill
- spec-human-decisionSkill
- sql-optimizationSkill
- story-pointsSkill
- summarizeSkill
- swarmSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- test-planSkill
- ui-loopSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 159
Read the exact passage before quoting wording, numbers, identifiers, statuses, commands or dates.
- Very specific: line 165
Put procedures, exhaustive error lists, tool details and duplicate bilingual text in the body/references.
- Distinctive: line 170
Only for borrowing another skill's rules/workflows into an existing skill, not ordinary edits.
- Distinctive: line 174
Check the diff against the checklist.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AGENTS.md
Combine with project-specific rules. Favor caution over speed; use judgment for trivial tasks.
Odyssey: RULE names a rule; WHEN limits scope; MUST requires, MUST_NOT forbids, PREFER favors. Lists apply item by item; this file's authority/scope are unchanged.
1. Think Before Coding
RULE @think_before_coding:
WHEN: before_implementation
MUST: [state_assumptions_explicitly, present_alternative_interpretations_and_tradeoffs,
surface_simpler_approaches, push_back_when_warranted,
stop_identify_and_ask_when_uncertain_or_confused]2. Simplicity First
RULE @simplicity:
MUST: [simplest_correct_solution, simplify_if_overcomplicated,
each_added_check_abstraction_dependency_error_branch_test_or_ui_worth_its_upkeep,
complete_necessary_work_correctly,
remove_existing_redundant_complexity_before_adding_abstractions_or_dependencies]
MUST_NOT: [unrequested_features_flexibility_config_compatibility_ui_or_architecture,
speculative_design, single_use_abstractions, impossible_scenario_defenses,
add_layers_to_overcomplicated_design, silently_expand_scope_for_theoretical_robustness]
PREFER: fewer_moving_parts
RULE @speculative_complexity:
WHEN: adding_complexity_for_speculative_or_vanishingly_unlikely_race_or_security_edge_cases
MUST: [explain_concrete_failure_mode_likelihood_and_complexity_cost_to_user,
obtain_user_buy_in_after_explanation_and_before_adding_complexity]
RULE @requirement_confirmation:
WHEN: non_brainstorming
MUST: [propose_unrequested_requirements_only_when_necessary,
obtain_user_confirmation_before_adopting_suggested_requirements]
RULE @failure_handling:
MUST: [validate_only_at_system_boundaries_including_user_input_external_apis_and_files,
trust_established_internal_contracts_invariants_and_framework_guarantees,
handle_only_real_actionable_failures]
MUST_NOT: [redundant_internal_checks, unnecessary_fallbacks_or_excess_defenses,
catches_or_silent_recovery_masking_programming_errors]
RULE @user_experience:
MUST: user_expectations_first
MUST_NOT: [developer_notes_implementation_comments_or_internal_instructions_in_ui,
unnecessary_engineering_or_obvious_interaction_explanations,
prompts_or_warnings_unless_helping_meaningful_decisions_or_preventing_major_errors]3. Surgical Changes
RULE @surgical_changes:
MUST: [minimal_change, every_changed_line_traces_to_request,
match_existing_style_and_patterns, reuse_or_simplify_before_abstracting,
remove_own_newly_unused_imports_variables_and_functions,
report_unrelated_dead_code]
MUST_NOT: [unrelated_code_comment_or_formatting_improvements, refactoring_unbroken_code,
delete_preexisting_dead_code_unless_requested,
feature_flags_or_compatibility_shims_when_direct_changes_suffice,
compatibility_hacks_using_unused_variable_underscore_renames_or_type_reexports]
RULE @skill_tool_independence:
MUST: |
按用户指定的对象确定修改范围。只有 phoenix-ui skill 随 Phoenix UI 工具附带,
phoenix-diagram skill 随 Phoenix Diagram 工具附带;其余所有 skill 均独立于
这两个工具,不以它们的安装、engine、协议或索引作为执行前提。
MUST_NOT: |
因名称相近、同仓存放、工具曾引用 skill 或存在历史耦合,就把 skill 修订
扩大为运行时、安装器、迁移、发布流程或协议升级。确有范围外依赖时先说明,
未获用户授权不实施;工具限制不能反向变成独立 skill 的执行前提。
RULE @documentation:
MUST: [comments_explain_why, concise_current_searchable_docs,
add_comments_only_for_nonobvious_logic_or_non_self_descriptive_code,
update_or_remove_stale_comments_and_docs_on_behavior_change]
MUST_NOT: [code_paraphrases_in_comments, development_history_annotations,
stale_text_with_appended_corrections, duplicate_docs,
add_docstrings_comments_or_type_annotations_to_otherwise_unchanged_code]4. Goal-Driven Execution
RULE @goal_driven_execution:
MUST: [verifiable_success_criteria, brief_multistep_plan_with_checks,
test_invalid_inputs_then_implement_validation,
reproduce_bug_in_test_before_fix, tests_pass_before_and_after_refactor,
iterate_until_verified, prioritize_quality_and_completeness_over_token_savings,
full_effort_in_required_reasoning_investigation_implementation_and_verification,
concise_communication, respect_agreed_scope_and_stopping_rules,
autonomously_finish_remaining_in_scope_work,
fix_related_in_scope_defects_found_during_verification]
MUST_NOT: [stop_at_findings_while_actionable_in_scope_work_remains,
open_ended_hunts_for_hypothetical_or_unrelated_problems]
RULE @meaningful_tests:
MUST: [test_meaningful_behavior_key_boundaries_and_real_regressions,
exercise_interfaces_as_external_callers_and_assert_caller_observable_outcomes,
remove_requested_obsolete_or_redundant_tests,
delete_requested_tests_that_pass_when_all_tested_functions_are_empty_and_return_no_data,
run_smallest_relevant_check,
reuse_valid_verification_when_relevant_code_configuration_and_conditions_unchanged,
retest_only_after_meaningful_change_new_failure_or_concrete_acceptance_evidence_gap]
MUST_NOT: [redundant_or_trivial_tests, implementation_coupled_tests,
per_function_coverage_chasing, exhaustive_imaginary_failures,
unnecessary_regression_burden,
whole_suite_repetition_for_reassurance_or_report_challenge_alone]
RULE @automated_test_scope:
MUST: automated_tests_assert_outcomes_produced_by_deterministic_code
MUST_NOT: [write_automated_tests_for_llm_output, write_automated_tests_for_static_source_text]
RULE @verification_scope_and_cost:
MUST: |
执行前将「本次改变的行为 → 能发现相关错误的检查 → 最小命令」对应起来,
按行为及直接依赖选择验证,不按仓库、语言或工具名称选择全套测试。
先读聚合命令实际包含的步骤;含无关安装、迁移、发布或其他模块检查时,
直接选相关子命令。skill、提示词和文档修改默认只核对相关元数据、引用与
指令一致性,必要时做有界行为演练,不自动测试关联运行时或安装器。
仅用户明确要求、改动影响共享基础设施或影响无法隔离时扩大回归范围,
运行前说明具体依据与成本;相关检查通过即结束,条件未变复用已有结果。
无关失败只报告,不扩大修复;发现已启动的检查与改动无关,及时终止自己的
测试进程,不因已经启动而继续等待。
MUST_NOT: [unmapped_checks, full_suite_by_default,
expand_scope_to_make_unrelated_checks_pass,
repeat_passed_checks_for_reassurance]
RULE @complete_milestones:
WHEN: long_task
MUST: [understand_full_scope_and_acceptance_first, complete_coherent_usable_milestones,
targeted_development_checks,
milestone_regression_scoped_by_changed_behavior_and_direct_dependencies]
MUST_NOT: [repeated_stops_after_fragments, full_suite_after_each_micro_edit,
test_frequency_as_progress]
RULE @temporary_resource_cleanup:
WHEN: code_and_test_reviews_completed
MUST: [inspect_task_related_temporary_directories_git_worktrees_branches_and_docker_containers,
identify_resources_safe_to_remove, verify_no_background_task_dependencies_before_cleanup,
promptly_remove_safe_temporary_resources_to_reclaim_disk_space]5. Evidence & Quotation
RULE @evidence:
MUST: [read_relevant_source_specs_and_docs_before_conclusions,
cover_all_relevant_sections_and_tail, inspect_behavior_and_contracts_before_changes,
disclose_unverified_items, durable_claims_traceable_to_source_passage_and_content]
MUST_NOT: [invented_requirements_or_constraints, unread_or_truncated_content_as_known,
source_details_reconstructed_from_memory]Read the exact passage before quoting wording, numbers, identifiers, statuses, commands or dates; re-read truncated passages before use. When a quote contradicts its source, search the whole repo, fix every copy of that error and notify the owner; leave no conflicting versions.
6. Skill Descriptions
SKILL.mddescriptions: triggers and essential exclusions first, then outcome. Put misrouting exclusions beside triggers, never only at the end or in the body.- Target ≤250 characters (Chinese ≤200), preferably ~100; the first 100 should convey applicability independently. These are repo writing targets, not universal agent truncation limits.
- Put procedures, exhaustive error lists, tool details and duplicate bilingual text in the body/references; descriptions select skills, not list workflows.
- After editing, read the full description and its first 100 characters. Preserve intent, boundaries and unrelated frontmatter/instructions; no mechanical cuts. Validate only the edited skills' YAML with the repository's allowed fields; generic
quick_validate.pyrejects this repo's intentionalargument-hint,when_to_useanddisable-model-invocationfields. Metadata checks do not requirenpm test.
7. Reference Skill Integration Gate
Only for borrowing another skill's rules/workflows into an existing skill, not ordinary edits.
- Before editing, read current target rules/reference passages and show a concrete checklist in chat or the requested plan for each change: target file/rule, current behavior, reference source/passage, adopt/adapt/reject, impact on principles/stance, verification. Assess affected applicability, invocation, authorization, interfaces and acceptance requirements explicitly.
- Existing principles/stance are the baseline; adapt or reject conflicts. Integration does not authorize changes to principles, stance or invocation/authorization policy. Unresolved changes need explicit user direction; honor existing explicit authorization without asking again.
- Check the diff against the checklist; update it and resolve new conflicts before further behavior changes, never only after merging.
Experience Capture
During development, use experience-capture at a natural pause for a useful non-obvious failure, user correction or repeated automatable workflow. Save a few current-context lines, then resume; no investigation, evidence fetching, full-record reload or task interruption for collection. Skip without a pause, when read-only or disabled. Deeper work waits for the user's $agi-mode 复盘 / $agi-mode reflect.
Working in This Repository
- Stay on the current branch unless the user explicitly requests a new one; historical examples and skill/workflow conventions are not authorization.
- Choose Node/Python/metadata and runtime checks under
@verification_scope_and_cost; direct file/module/package commands are allowed.npm testandnpm run test:phoenixare aggregate entrypoints, not default requirements. Actual Phoenix runtime checks use mise, Rust 1.99.1 and pinned build tools; missing tools fail, not skip. Browser, native-platform and real provider-session acceptance apply only to relevant changes and must be recorded separately, never inferred from another check. skills/<name>/is the source of truth. Gitignored.claude/skills/,.agents/skills/and.codex/skills/are local installs. skills.sh copies need push/reinstall for local edits; source symlinks reflect them immediately. When work depends on recent changes and a loaded skill is an installed copy, first rundiff -rq .claude/skills/<name> skills/<name>and use source when different. Point behavior checks atskills/<name>/....- When skill names, arguments, next-step commands, verdicts or status words change, update all interface restatements in the same change: README tables/loop; under
skills/agi-mode/,playbooks/sdlc.md,playbooks/what-next.md,evals/scenarios.md, plusassets/sdlc/state-model.mdandassets/sdlc/protocol.mdfor verdict/report-type changes; the skill'sagents/openai.yaml; and copied rules likeskills/agi-mode/references/interface-design.md. Find withgrep -rn '<skill-name>' skills README.md docs. Each must fully describe the new behavior, not just avoid conflicts. Preserve historical records/snapshots; do not add absentagents/openai.yaml. - UI review workflow changes keep the two skills and their referenced Markdown contracts consistent. Tool-side test fixtures and Rust policies do not define these independent skills and are not automatically changed or tested with them; tool adaptation requires its own authorized scope.
- To create/revise skills, follow Skill 编写与修订; agi-mode is not auto-invoked (
disable-model-invocation), so this playbook is not otherwise loaded.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

