agentleFS
WomenDefiningAIWomenDefiningAI/claude-code-skills/skills/shownotes-generator/SKILL.md

shownotes-generator

Skill10 starsChanged 13 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate comprehensive "Shownotes" summaries from longform articles, papers, transcripts, videos, or audio content. Use when users request shownotes, episode summaries, content summaries with takeaways, or when they reference the mdynotes.com format. Creates structured summaries with metadata, hooks, takeaways, quotes, and references.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

20 rules. About 0 are common, 20 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈20

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask for episode summaries with takeaways and quotes

    line 34
  2. Distinctive:

    No author/speaker attribution is needed

    line 52
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask the user to confirm the inferred metadata.

    line 70
  4. Distinctive:

    Create shownotes following this exact structure:

    line 74
  5. Distinctive:

    Use hyphens for bulletpoints to keep them markdown-compatible

    line 113
  6. Distinctive:

    Ensure all authors/speakers are represented across the topics

    line 115
  7. Distinctive:

    CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Before finalizing takeaways, verify that EACH takeaway directly addresses or supports the main question posed in the …

    line 119
  8. Distinctive:

    Use bold topic sentences to convey main points immediately

    line 138
  9. Distinctive:

    Add bullet points for lists, frameworks, advantages, or processes

    line 140
  10. Distinctive:

    Use tables if the structure improves reading comprehension

    line 141
  11. Distinctive:

    If a takeaway doesn't directly support the hook question, reframe or replace it

    line 144
  12. Distinctive:

    Prefer active voice constructions

    line 151
  13. Distinctive:

    Remove unnecessary qualifiers ("significantly," "particularly," "specifically")

    line 152
  14. Distinctive:

    Every word should earn its place

    line 154
  15. Distinctive:

    No unnecessary transitions between paragraphs

    line 175
  16. Distinctive:

    Every sentence adds new information

    line 176
  17. Distinctive:

    Ensure balanced representation of all major authors

    line 236
  18. Distinctive:

    Use concrete examples and actionable advice

    line 243
  19. Distinctive:

    All major authors represented in content

    line 252
  20. Distinctive:

    EVERY takeaway must directly support the episode hook question

    line 256

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Created by: mdy (https://mdynotes.com/) Created: 2025-Oct-28 Version: 1.7 || Last Update: 2025-Nov-16 License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Attribution Required: Yes - Include author name and link when sharing/modifying For the latest version, check mdynotes.com/resources CHANGELOG v1.7: Added use of tables as alternative to bullets v1.6: Improved instruction in the Quotes section v1.5: Strict adherence to Markdown for more consistent results v1.4: Restructured with top-level REFERENCE.md for examples; condensed main instructions; added inline examples v1.3: Added conciseness guidelines to reduce verbosity while maintaining nuance with accompanying examples v1.2: Added "this is AI-generated" disclaimer v1.1: Added this metadata section v1.0: Ported to Claude Skills format from prompt format -->

Shownotes Generator

Generate comprehensive, well-formatted shownotes from any longform content (articles, papers, transcripts, videos, audio). Shownotes follow a specific structure designed to provide value to target audiences through engaging hooks, detailed takeaways, memorable quotes, and proper attribution.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when users:

  • Explicitly request "shownotes" or "show notes" for content
  • Ask for episode summaries with takeaways and quotes
  • Reference the mdynotes.com format or style
  • Request structured summaries that include:
    • Engaging hooks or key questions
    • Detailed takeaways with attribution
    • Memorable quotes from speakers/authors
    • Author/speaker references and links
  • Provide longform content in these formats:
    • Podcast or video transcripts
    • Research papers or academic articles
    • Blog posts or long-form articles
    • Audio recordings (when transcribed)

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • Users want a simple, brief summary (use standard summarization instead)
  • Content is short-form (tweets, short posts, brief articles)
  • Users only need key points without detailed structure
  • No author/speaker attribution is needed

Core Workflow

Step 1: Infer Metadata

Analyze the content and infer these variables:

  • Original Content Type: [Paper, Video, Blog post, Article, Audio, Transcript]
  • Original Source: [URL if available]
  • Target Audience: [Role interested in the topic]
  • Main Topic: [Specific topic covered]
  • Date Published: [Original publication date]
  • Shownotes Generated: [Today's date]
  • Technical Terms: [Key terminology used]
  • Model Used: [Current LLM model]
  • Prompt Used: shownotes-generator-skill-v# (where the version # is inferred based on comment block near the start of this skill file)

Ask the user to confirm the inferred metadata. Request corrections and update as needed before proceeding.

Step 2: Generate Shownotes Structure

Create shownotes following this exact structure:

Header Section

Display the confirmed metadata as bullet points.

Disclaimer (include the following, including horizontal lines/separators)

CRITICAL: Format the disclaimer section exactly as shown below to ensure it renders in normal paragraph font, not heading font:


Disclaimer: These notes are AI-generated, may have errors, and are not a substitute for reading/watching/listening to the real thing.


The Hook

Craft an engaging question that:

  • Frames the main topic
  • Highlights the value proposition
  • Makes readers want to explore further

Example: "How can trust and safety teams balance user protection with freedom of expression while scaling globally—and what lessons can we learn from those who've been in the trenches?"

The Summary

Format: "In this [content type] of [show/series name], [author introduction and credentials]. [Brief description of discussion format and collective expertise]."

CRITICAL: After the opening paragraph, include a "Topics discussed:" section formatted as a bulleted list:

Topics discussed:

  • [Specific topic 1 with concrete details]
  • [Specific topic 2 with concrete details]
  • [Continue for 6-8 topics total]
  • And much more!

Example opening: "In this research paper from MIT and Stanford, Dr. Sarah Chen (Director of Trust & Safety at TechCorp) and Professor James Williams (Digital Ethics researcher) explore the evolution of content moderation practices."

Key requirements:

  • Use hyphens for bulletpoints to keep them markdown-compatible
  • Each topic should be a complete phrase or sentence, not just keywords
  • Ensure all authors/speakers are represented across the topics

Takeaways Section (4-10 takeaways)

CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: Before finalizing takeaways, verify that EACH takeaway directly addresses or supports the main question posed in the Episode Hook. Silently verify relevance but do not include verification process in output.

Format each takeaway as:

[Number]. [Major insight with bold title].

[Opening paragraph with key context and primary speaker quote in italics]

[Second paragraph with bulleted breakdown when appropriate:]

  • [Point 1 with specific detail]
  • [Point 2 with specific detail]
  • [Point 3 with specific detail]
  • [Point 4 with specific detail]

[Closing paragraph with implications or why this matters]

Formatting Guidelines:

  • Use bold topic sentences to convey main points immediately
  • Break long concepts into multiple paragraphs (NO walls of text)
  • Add bullet points for lists, frameworks, advantages, or processes
  • Use tables if the structure improves reading comprehension
  • Takeaways must be easy to skim, with bullets and bolding/italics
  • Include specific examples and quotes distributed across paragraphs
  • If a takeaway doesn't directly support the hook question, reframe or replace it

Conciseness Guidelines:

  • Eliminate redundant phrases ("in many cases," "it's important to note")
  • Tighten bullet points by removing obvious explanations
  • Cut transitional padding and combine related ideas
  • Prefer active voice constructions
  • Remove unnecessary qualifiers ("significantly," "particularly," "specifically")
  • Target length: 130-170 words per takeaway (though okay to exceed if needed)
  • Every word should earn its place

Example

**1. Trust and safety requires balancing competing values, not applying universal rules.**

Dr. Chen emphasizes that *"the hardest part of trust and safety isn't writing policies—it's making nuanced decisions when fundamental values like safety and expression come into conflict."* This insight challenges the perception that content moderation is simply enforcing clear rules.

**Four key principles** for navigating these tensions:
• **Context sensitivity**: The same content may be appropriate in one community but harmful in another, requiring local and cultural understanding
• **Stakeholder inclusion**: Effective policies emerge from ongoing dialogue with diverse user groups, not top-down mandates
• **Transparency with nuance**: Users deserve clear explanations of decisions while acknowledging that some contexts require confidentiality
• **Continuous evolution**: Policies must adapt as platform usage, cultural norms, and threat vectors change

The implications extend beyond social media. As Chen notes, any platform facilitating user interaction faces similar challenges, from gaming communities to professional networks. Organizations that recognize moderation as an ongoing balancing act rather than a solved problem maintain user trust more effectively.

What makes this work:

  • Active voice throughout
  • Combined related sentences naturally
  • Removed filler words like "First," "Second," "Third," "Finally"
  • No unnecessary transitions between paragraphs
  • Every sentence adds new information

See REFERENCE.md for additional verbose vs. concise examples.

Interesting Quotes (if applicable)

Process (silent - don't explain to user):

  1. Identify two to four sections most directly relevant to the episode hook
  2. Pull multiple quotes from that specific section
  3. Present quotes with context

Format: [Number]. [Topic/Theme]

Here's how [Authors] summarized [framework/perspective]:

[Perspective 1]:

  • [Point with title]. "[Quote with explanation]"
  • [Additional points as relevant]

See REFERENCE.md for detailed quote formatting examples.

Related Content Links

Related resources mentioned:

  • [Link to related content 1]

References

Where to find the authors:

[Author/Speaker 1 Name]:

  • X: [link]
  • LinkedIn: [link]

[Author/Speaker 2 Name]:

  • X: [link]
  • LinkedIn: [link]

[Add all notable authors/speakers]

Mentions during the episode:

  • [All tools, books, articles, companies mentioned with links]

Content Analysis Guidelines

Multi-Author Focus

  • Identify author dynamics and expertise areas
  • Extract major learnings with proper attribution
  • Note areas of consensus vs. disagreement
  • Show how different perspectives complement each other
  • Ensure balanced representation of all major authors

Writing Style

  • Professional but conversational tone
  • Well-structured takeaways with multiple paragraphs and strategic bullet points
  • Clear author attribution for quotes and insights
  • Use concrete examples and actionable advice
  • Emphasize the value of multiple perspectives
  • Concise without sacrificing nuance—every sentence adds value

See REFERENCE.md for common verbosity patterns to avoid.

Quality Standards

  • Each takeaway provides standalone value with improved readability
  • All major authors represented in content
  • Different viewpoints properly highlighted
  • Resources and mentions comprehensively cataloged
  • Quotes clearly attributed with context
  • EVERY takeaway must directly support the episode hook question
  • Efficient communication: 130-170 words per takeaway

See REFERENCE.md for formatting examples and conciseness principles.

Examples

Example: Podcast Transcript Request

User provides: Transcript from a 90-minute podcast interview with three AI researchers discussing alignment challenges.

User asks: "Can you create shownotes for this podcast transcript?"

Skill output includes all sections:

  1. Header - Displays confirmed metadata (content type, source, audience, topic, dates, model, prompt version)
  2. Disclaimer - AI-generated warning with horizontal separators
  3. The Hook - "How can we ensure AI systems remain aligned with human values as they become more capable—and what are the hardest unsolved problems in alignment research?"
  4. The Summary - Opening paragraph introducing the three researchers and their credentials, followed by "Topics discussed:" with 6-8 bulleted topics ending with "And much more!"
  5. Takeaways - 6-8 detailed takeaways (130-170 words each) with quotes from all three researchers, strategic bullet points, and clear attribution
  6. Interesting Quotes - Key quotes pulled from the most hook-relevant section with context
  7. Related Content Links - Papers, tools, and resources mentioned during the episode
  8. References - Author social links (X, LinkedIn, websites) plus all mentioned tools, books, articles, companies

Final Checklist

Before delivering shownotes:

  1. ✓ Metadata confirmed with user
  2. ✓ Disclaimer placed immediately after metadata
  3. ✓ Hook directly poses the central question
  4. ✓ Summary introduces all key authors and topics
  5. ✓ Each takeaway passes silent relevance check (supports hook)
  6. ✓ Formatting uses paragraphs and strategic bullets (no walls of text)
  7. ✓ Conciseness review completed (see REFERENCE.md for guidelines)
  8. ✓ Quotes pulled from most hook-relevant section
  9. ✓ All authors properly attributed throughout
  10. ✓ References and links comprehensive

For detailed examples and formatting reference, see REFERENCE.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.