think
Skill4 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Brainstorm a feature or design with an automatic Codex second opinion on every clarifying question. Use when the user runs /claudex:think, or asks for Claude+Codex collaborative brainstorming. Wraps superpowers:brainstorming.
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ronniepinnell/caspertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hurleywgly/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- seankoji-com/.agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- iwesys/IWEtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- therealtinhtute/mono-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use hunt, read and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ninehillsSkillhunt
Finds root cause before applying fixes for errors, crashes, regressions, failing tests, broken behavior, and screenshot-reported defects. Use when users report in any language errors, crashes, broken behavior, regressions, failing tests, screenshot evidence, or something that used to work and now fails. Not for code review or new features.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillread
Read pages from a document. Returns MinerU markdown (preferred) or PyPDF text, with optional page screenshots and sub-image fetching. When markdown is available, a figure_images_meta catalog is included — use the figures parameter to fetch specific sub-image pixels. Triggers include "read page 5", "what does page 12 say", "show me the chart on page 3", "extract pages 3-5".
Also in 6 projects that use this
DockerSkillwrite
Write or edit reader-facing technical prose for immediate comprehension. Use for documentation, PR titles and descriptions, release notes, design documents, user-facing explanations, and substantive comments. Also use when asked to make writing clearer, more natural, less AI-generated, or easier to read. For documentation fixes, handles edits, formatting, self-review, and commits after research identifies what to change. Do not use for code-only tasks with no prose deliverable.
Also in 7 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillhealth
Soul system health check with remediation
Also in 5 projects that use this
kt057Skillcheck
lint, typecheck, test を一括実行して結果をサマリーする
Also in 6 projects that use this
OpenAISkilltranscribe
Transcribe audio files to text with optional diarization and known-speaker hints. Use when a user asks to transcribe speech from audio/video, extract text from recordings, or label speakers in interviews or meetings.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian★ 16ksame name
- tw93/claude-health★ 7.5ksame name
- tw93/Waza★ 7.5ksame name
- ninehills/skills★ 280same name
- garagon/nanostack★ 206same name
- jonathanmalkin/jules★ 65same name
- TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template★ 63same name
- myclaude-sh/myclaude-creator-engine★ 25same name
- ironyjk/strategy-frameworks★ 14same name
- therealtinhtute/mono-harness★ 5same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- buildSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- emailSkill
- setupSkill
- ultra-researchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
When the user runs /claudex:think, a UserPromptExpansion hook arms the gate for this session automatically (it runs in hook context, so it …
- Very specific: line 20
Add My take: — 1-3 sentences: do you agree?
- Very specific: line 24
Wrap up: When you transition to writing-plans, the gate auto-disarms (a PreToolUse Skill hook handles it).
- Very specific: line 49
Fail-open by default: if Codex is unavailable or times out, the question proceeds with a note that the second opinion was skipped — mention …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
claudex:think — brainstorming with a Codex second opinion
Brainstorm normally, but every clarifying question is routed through Codex for a second opinion before the user sees it. Enforcement is automatic — you never call Codex yourself, and you do NOT need to run any shell command to turn it on.
How arming works (automatic)
When the user runs /claudex:think, a UserPromptExpansion hook arms the gate for this session automatically (it runs in hook context, so it isn't subject to the permission classifier). You don't touch it.
Steps
- Brainstorm. Invoke
Skill(superpowers:brainstorming)and follow it normally. Ask clarifying questions viaAskUserQuestionas usual — the hook intercepts each one. Handle the Codex critique. When you try to ask a clarifying question, the hook blocks it. The (red) denial reason is kept short on purpose — it points you to a file (
~/.claude/claudex/state/<session>-critique.md) holding your drafted question + Codex's critique, so the critique isn't shown red and then repeated. Read that file, then in ONE message:- Show the question you originally drafted verbatim under an
**Original question:**heading (keep your recommended option), so the user can see your framing before Codex weighed in. - Present Codex's critique verbatim under a
**Codex says:**heading. - Add
**My take:**— 1-3 sentences: do you agree? Fold any fixes you accept into the question. - Re-issue the
AskUserQuestion(revised if you agreed) — the revised question is the one the user actually answers. It passes through this time (one re-issue is allowed within ~2 minutes of the block).
So each round the user sees, in order: Original question (with your recommendation) → Codex says → My take → the answer window — with no red duplicate of the critique. (If the file can't be written, the hook falls back to putting the critique inline in the denial reason.)
- Show the question you originally drafted verbatim under an
- Wrap up. When you transition to
writing-plans, the gate auto-disarms (aPreToolUseSkill hook handles it); it also auto-expires after the TTL.
Design before implementation (enforced by the hook, not just by this text)
While the gate is armed you are in design mode. PreToolUse hooks block — not just discourage — these until the design is approved:
- Editing code.
Edit/Write/MultiEdit/NotebookEditto any non-markdown file is denied (.mdxcounts as code). Don't fight it: it means you skipped to implementation. Go back and brainstorm. - Editing instruction files.
CLAUDE.md,SKILL.md,AGENTS.md,GEMINI.mdare denied even though they're markdown — changing them mid-session could weaken the gate itself. - Implementation skills.
test-driven-development,executing-plans,subagent-driven-development,frontend-design,mcp-builderare denied. - Shell writes.
Bashcommands that write code (echo >,sed -i,tee,node -e,git apply/checkout,cp/mv, …) or that touch the gate marker are denied. Read-only exploration passes. Don't try to route around the edit gate through the shell.
What you can do while armed: write the design/spec/plan markdown doc, ask AskUserQuestion, and (after you've brainstormed and the user approves) invoke writing-plans — which disarms the gate and reopens everything for implementation. So the only sanctioned path out of design mode is: brainstorm → approved design → writing-plans. If the user explicitly tells you to skip the design process, that's their call — point them to the kill switch below; don't disarm the gate yourself (the kill switch is for the user to type with a leading !).
If you never see a
Codex says:block on your questions, the gate didn't arm (e.g. the plugin wasn't reloaded after install). Tell the user to run/reload-pluginsand re-run/claudex:think, rather than trying to write the marker yourself (a model Bash write to~/.claudeis blocked in auto mode).
Kill switch
- Stop early (user runs this):
! rm -f ~/.claude/claudex/armed - Globally off: set
{"enabled": false}in~/.claude/claudex/config.json. - The gate also auto-expires after
ttlHours(default 6).
Behavior notes
- Implementation gate: on by default; set
{"enforceImplementationGate": false}in~/.claude/claudex/config.jsonto turn off the code/skill blocking described above (the Codex question gate is unaffected). It is fail-open — a hook error never blocks an edit. - Read-only: Codex cannot edit files while critiquing.
- Fail-open by default: if Codex is unavailable or times out, the question proceeds with a note that the second opinion was skipped — mention it to the user. Set
{"failClosed": true}in~/.claude/claudex/config.jsonto block instead. - This plugin's hook runs on
node. Errors like "Bun not found" come from a different plugin, not claudex.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

