agentleFS
WikiEducationFoundationWikiEducationFoundation/WikiEduDashboard/.claude/skills/commit/SKILL.md

commit

Skill431 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Stage and commit changes with a well-formed commit message following the WikiEduDashboard format. Use this skill when asked to commit, make a commit, or create a commit.

187 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use validate-plan, act-on-feedback and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • shawn-dumasSkill

    validate-plan

    Validate an orchestration plan after pre-flight certification. Runs adversarial review, deep review (verify prompt data against codebase), and PoC gate for risky approaches. Auto-invoked by orchestrate-* skills at Step 8.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    act-on-feedback

    Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • decocmsSkill

    add-mcp-tools

    Guide for adding new MCP tools with consistent patterns for schemas, tool definitions, registry updates, and Better Auth integration

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    generate-run-commands

    Generate or modify run commands for the current session. Use when the user wants to set up or update run commands that appear in the session's Run button.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mitsuhikoSkill

    oebb-scotty

    Austrian rail travel planner (ÖBB Scotty). Use when planning train journeys in Austria, checking departures/arrivals at stations, or looking for service disruptions. Covers ÖBB trains, S-Bahn, regional trains, and connections to neighboring countries.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mitsuhikoSkill

    pi-share

    Load and parse session transcripts from shittycodingagent.ai/buildwithpi.ai/buildwithpi.com/pi.dev (pi-share) URLs. Fetches gists, decodes embedded session data, and extracts conversation history.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create a git commit with a message that follows the project's format.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Use the current coding agent's actual product name in attribution text (for example, Claude Code or Codex).

    line 10
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow the project format exactly:

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Call out non-obvious decisions or tradeoffs

    line 55
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep it factual; don't pad

    line 56
  6. Very specific:

    After committing, confirm success with git log -1 --format="%h %s".

    line 110

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Commit

Create a git commit with a message that follows the project's format.

Use the current coding agent's actual product name in attribution text (for example, Claude Code or Codex). Never attribute one agent's work to another.

Phase 1: Understand what's being committed

  1. git status — identify staged and unstaged files
  2. git diff --staged — read every staged change in detail
  3. git diff — note any unstaged changes (do not commit these unless asked)
  4. Review the conversation history — what was the user trying to accomplish, and why?

Phase 2: Draft the commit message

Follow the project format exactly:

<Subject line: imperative mood, ≤72 chars>

## Changes

<What was built or changed and why, organized by file or component.
Include any non-obvious design decisions or tradeoffs.>

## Process

<How the current coding agent was used: what the user asked for, what approach
was taken, and any errors or corrections along the way. Be candid and specific
— if the agent got something wrong and needed correction, say so. If the
solution was straightforward, say that too.>

(Commit message written by <agent name>.)

Co-Authored-By: <current agent's trailer, per the harness/environment instructions>

Subject line guidelines

  • Imperative mood: "Fix flaky spec" not "Fixed" or "Fixes"
  • ≤72 characters
  • No trailing period
  • Specific enough to understand without reading the body

Changes section guidelines

  • Organize by file or logical component
  • Explain why, not just what — the diff already shows what changed
  • Call out non-obvious decisions or tradeoffs
  • Keep it factual; don't pad

Process section guidelines

Describe the actual back-and-forth, then include a session summary paragraph covering the following. Be specific with numbers where you can; estimate and note the uncertainty where you can't.

Session provenance — Did this session start from scratch, or were the changes already partially or fully written before the session began? If the user brought in pre-existing code or commits, say so and characterize how much of the work predates this conversation.

Prompts and human input — How many messages did the user send? Roughly how much text did they write in total (a few words, a sentence or two per message, paragraph-length)? Was the direction terse or detailed?

Session length and character — Was this a short focused exchange (a handful of turns) or an extended back-and-forth (many turns, multiple approaches tried)? Did the work require iteration and correction, or was it resolved quickly?

Tests run — How many test runs happened over the course of the session, and what was the outcome trajectory (e.g. "two failures before a clean pass", "green on the first run")?

Tokens — If token usage is visible in the current agent's UI, report it. Otherwise omit this entirely.

This section exists so future readers can calibrate how much human direction and iteration went into the work. Make it genuinely informative, not boilerplate.

Phase 3: Commit

Stage files if needed, then commit using a HEREDOC to preserve formatting:

git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
Subject line here

## Changes

...

## Process

...

(Commit message written by <agent name>.)

Co-Authored-By: <current agent's trailer, per the harness/environment instructions>
EOF
)"

After committing, confirm success with git log -1 --format="%h %s".

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.