project-planning
Skill18 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Break a Linear project into atomic, dependency-aware implementation tickets grouped by layer (schema, types, API, backend, UI), present the plan for approval, then create the tickets. Use when the user runs /project-planning or asks to plan a Linear project, create implementation tickets, or break a project into tasks for parallel agents.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zhucl1006/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- britt/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- life-itself/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- teessmartai/Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- AgentShekel/agentic-workflowtheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder★ 21same name
- britt/agent-skills★ 11same name
- wedow/skills★ 8same name
- AgentShekel/agentic-workflow★ 4same name
- life-itself/skills★ 2same name
- stepanenkoviktor0110-boop/ai-dev-methodology★ 2same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-business★ 1same name
- teessmartai/Skills★ 1same name
- veithly/claude-product-workflow★ 1same name
- yiweiwan/skills★ 1same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- copySkill
- deploy-prodSkill
- linear-oneshotSkill
- project-updateSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- wani-code-reviewSkill
- create-flow-appSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- knowledge-baseSkill
- release-migrationSkill
- translationsSkill
- visualize-flowSkill
- audit-trackingSkill
- instrument-trackingSkill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.15-to-0.16Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.16-to-0.17Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.17-to-0.18Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.18-to-0.19Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.19-to-0.20Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.22-to-0.23Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.23-to-0.24Skill
- migrate-waniwani-sdk-0.24-to-0.25Skill
- waniwani-sdkSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Create implementation tickets for the Linear project the user specifies (the text after the command, e.g.
- Distinctive: line 27
Ask the user to approve before proceeding
- Distinctive: line 28
Wait for user approval: - Use AskUserQuestion to get explicit confirmation:
- Distinctive: line 38
Before creating tickets, present the plan to the user in this format:
- Distinctive: line 77
After presenting, use AskUserQuestion with options:
- Distinctive: line 103
Create tickets in this order (earlier layers block later ones):
- Distinctive: line 150
When creating issues, use:
- Distinctive: line 161
WAN-XX: Add notifications database schema
- Distinctive: line 163
WAN-XX+1: Add notification types and Zod schemas
- Distinctive: line 165
WAN-XX+2: Create notifications API endpoints
- Distinctive: line 167
WAN-XX+3: Create notification sender service
- Distinctive: line 169
WAN-XX+4: Add notifications UI components
- Distinctive: line 174
After creating all tickets, provide a summary:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Linear Project Planning
Create implementation tickets for the Linear project the user specifies (the text after the command, e.g. /project-planning User Notifications). If no project is named, ask which one.
Steps
- Fetch project details using
mcp__linear__get_projectwith the project name the user gave. - Fetch team info using
mcp__linear__list_teamsto get the team ID for creating issues - Analyze the project description to understand:
- The overall goal and scope
- Key implementation areas (database, API, UI, etc.)
- Dependencies between components
- Break down into atomic tickets following these principles:
- Each ticket should be completable by a single agent in isolation
- Tickets should have clear inputs and outputs
- Dependencies should be explicit (use Linear's blocking relations)
- Group by layer: Schema → Types → API → Backend Logic → UI
- Present the plan for approval - Show the user the complete ticket breakdown:
- Display each planned ticket with title and description summary
- Show the dependency graph (what blocks what)
- Highlight parallelization opportunities
- Ask the user to approve before proceeding
- Wait for user approval - Use AskUserQuestion to get explicit confirmation:
- Option to approve and create all tickets
- Option to request modifications to the plan
- Option to cancel
- Create tickets in Linear (only after approval) using
mcp__linear__create_issuefor each ticket - Set up dependencies using the
blocksparameter when creating issues - Summarize the created tickets to the user
Plan Presentation Format
Before creating tickets, present the plan to the user in this format:
## Proposed Implementation Plan for [Project Name]
### Summary
[Brief overview of the approach and total number of tickets]
### Ticket Breakdown
#### Layer 1: Database (X tickets)
1. **[Title]** - [One-line description]
2. **[Title]** - [One-line description]
#### Layer 2: Types (X tickets)
3. **[Title]** - [One-line description]
- Blocked by: #1
#### Layer 3: API (X tickets)
4. **[Title]** - [One-line description]
- Blocked by: #1, #3
[Continue for all layers...]
### Dependency Graph
#1 Database Schema
├── #3 Types (blocked by #1)
│ └── #5 Service (blocked by #3, #4)
└── #4 API Endpoints (blocked by #1)
└── #6 UI Components (blocked by #4)
#2 Config Setup (independent)
### Parallelization Opportunities
- **Phase 1** (can start immediately): #1, #2
- **Phase 2** (after Phase 1): #3, #4
- **Phase 3** (after Phase 2): #5, #6After presenting, use AskUserQuestion with options:
- "Create all tickets" (Recommended)
- "Modify the plan" - User can request changes
- "Cancel"
Ticket Design Principles
Atomicity
Each ticket should:
- Focus on a single concern (one table, one endpoint, one component)
- Be implementable without context from other in-progress tickets
- Have a clear "definition of done"
Parallelization
Structure tickets so multiple agents can work simultaneously:
- Database schema tickets can run in parallel (no cross-table dependencies)
- API endpoints can be parallelized once schemas exist
- UI components can be parallelized once APIs exist
Layered Approach
Create tickets in this order (earlier layers block later ones):
- Database Layer
- One ticket per table/schema change
- Include column definitions, indexes, relations
- Types Layer
- Zod schemas and TypeScript types
- Can often be combined with DB schema ticket
- API Layer
- One ticket per resource (CRUD endpoints)
- Include request/response schemas
- Backend Logic Layer
- Background jobs, workflows, integrations
- One ticket per function/workflow
- UI Layer
- One ticket per page or major component
- Include routes, forms, displays
Ticket Format
Each ticket should include:
## Overview
[Brief description of what this ticket accomplishes]
## Implementation Details
[Specific technical requirements, schemas, endpoints, etc.]
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
## Files to Create/Modify
- `path/to/file.ts` - descriptionCreating Issues
When creating issues, use:
team: the project's team (fetch vialist_teams/ from the project)project: the project the user specifiedpriority: 2 (High) for foundational work, 3 (Normal) for featuresblocks: Array of issue identifiers that this ticket blocks
Example Ticket Breakdown
For a "User Notifications" project:
- WAN-XX: Add notifications database schema
- Blocks: WAN-XX+1, WAN-XX+2
- WAN-XX+1: Add notification types and Zod schemas
- Blocked by: WAN-XX
- WAN-XX+2: Create notifications API endpoints
- Blocked by: WAN-XX
- WAN-XX+3: Create notification sender service
- Blocked by: WAN-XX+1, WAN-XX+2
- WAN-XX+4: Add notifications UI components
- Blocked by: WAN-XX+2
Output
After creating all tickets, provide a summary:
Created X tickets for [Project Name]:
| ID | Title | Blocked By |
|----|-------|------------|
| WAN-XX | Title | - |
| WAN-XX | Title | WAN-XX |
...
Parallelization opportunities:
- Tickets A, B, C can run in parallel (no dependencies)
- After A completes, tickets D, E can startDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

