visionaire-feedback
Skill4 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Collect and log feedback from [your name] after delivering significant work. Use after completing any meaningful deliverable — strategy docs, content drafts, brand work, code specs, research, creative briefs. Triggers when work is delivered and a response is received. Ask for a rating and optional comment, then log it. This feeds the self-study feedback-analysis loop.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/popular-web-designs/templates/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- public/llms-full.txtllms.txt
- public/llms.txtllms.txt
- openclaw-deckSkill
- arxivSkill
- blogwatcherSkill
- gemini-deep-researchSkill
- p5jsSkill
- polymarketSkill
- popular-web-designsSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- twitter-algorithm-optimizerSkill
- visionaire-knowledgeSkill
- youtube-contentSkill
- youtube-transcriptSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
After delivering significant work and receiving a response from [your name], collect feedback.
- Distinctive: line 11
After delivering: strategy docs, content, brand work, code/specs, research, creative briefs, or any task [your name] asked for explicitly.
- Distinctive: line 14
Keep it light — one line at the end of the reply or as a follow-up:
- Distinctive: line 33
Never ask for feedback twice on the same deliverable
- Distinctive: line 34
If [Your name] rates without a comment, log with empty comment — that's fine
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Visionaire Feedback Collection
After delivering significant work and receiving a response from [your name], collect feedback.
When to collect
After delivering: strategy docs, content, brand work, code/specs, research, creative briefs, or any task [your name] asked for explicitly. Skip for quick factual answers, casual chat, or heartbeats.
How to ask
Keep it light — one line at the end of the reply or as a follow-up:
"How'd that land? Rate it 1–5 (and drop a note if something missed)."
or shorter:
"Rate it 1–5?"
Logging feedback
Once [Your name] responds with a rating, run:
node /data/.openclaw/workspace/scripts/log-feedback.mjs <rating> \
--task "<short task description>" \
--comment "<their comment if any>" \
--tags "<relevant tags e.g. strategy,solana,content>"Notes
- Never ask for feedback twice on the same deliverable
- If [Your name] rates without a comment, log with empty comment — that's fine
- Feedback feeds directly into the self-study
feedback-analysisloop (fires once 1+ entries exist) - Cap is 100 entries — oldest drop off automatically
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

