agentleFS
Sign inStart free
ViplavgitaiViplavgitai/Claude_skills/skills/deprecated/request-refactor-plan/SKILL.md

request-refactor-plan

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

51 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use batch-grill-me, prd-to-plan and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • boyingliu01Skill

    batch-grill-me

    A relentless interview that asks every frontier question at once, round by round. Thin alias of `grilling` (#540) — upstream mattpocock/skills absorbed this protocol into grilling; XP-Gate keeps this name as the sprint-flow Phase 2 entry point so orchestration docs stay stable.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    prd-to-plan

    Turn a PRD into a multi-phase implementation plan using tracer-bullet vertical slices, saved as a local Markdown file in ./plans/. Use when user wants to break down a PRD, create an implementation plan, plan phases from a PRD, or mentions "tracer bullets".

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ShopifySkill

    triage-issue

    Triage a GitHub issue — classify priority (P0/P1/P2), search for duplicates, and apply labels.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 5 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.

    line 8
  2. Common:

    Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.

    line 12
  3. Common:

    Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase.

    line 18
  4. Common:

    Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan.

    line 22
  5. Common:

    Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets.

    line 50

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.

  1. Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.
  2. Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.
  3. Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.
  4. Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.
  5. Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.
  6. Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.
  7. Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."
  8. Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:
<refactor-plan-template>

Problem Statement

The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.

Solution

The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.

Commits

A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.

Decision Document

A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:

  • The modules that will be built/modified
  • The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
  • Technical clarifications from the developer
  • Architectural decisions
  • Schema changes
  • API contracts
  • Specific interactions

Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.

Testing Decisions

A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:

  • A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)
  • Which modules will be tested
  • Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)

Out of Scope

A description of the things that are out of scope for this refactor.

Further Notes (optional)

Any further notes about the refactor.

</refactor-plan-template>

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free