agentleFS
VektoAIVektoAI/pmstack/sprint/SKILL.md

sprint

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Sprint Captain mode. Plan a sprint from backlog. Capacity-aware, dependency-mapped, risk-flagged. Produces sprint goal, committed scope, stretch items, and ceremony agenda. Works with or without an existing Jira/Linear board.

27 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ecosystem-reference, fractal-delegation and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • naman10parikhSkill

    ecosystem-reference

    Quick-access directory of Claude Code ecosystem repos, skills, plugins, MCPs, and patterns. Use when improving the harness.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • naman10parikhSkill

    fractal-delegation

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • KirchliveSkill

    skill-routing

    Decides which of the installed skills a task needs and loads them before the work starts. This skill should be used at the beginning of any multi-step task — build, fix, refactor, migrate, review, plan, release, research, write, design, video — and again at every phase change, after context compaction, and when work moves into a different part of the codebase. Use it for requests like "let's build X", "fix this bug", "refactor Y", "plan the migration", "review this", and also when the user asks which skill applies, why a skill did not fire, or asks to check what is available.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • sublimotionSkill

    agent-runtime

    Launch and manage detached agent runs on EKS via the agent-runner CLI. Use when the user says "launch an agent run", "agent runtime", "agent-runner", "run this spec on the cluster", "check run status", "agent run logs", or "stop a run". Do NOT use for writing the agent-runner code itself (edit the sibling ../agent-runner repo), Terraform of the foundation (use terraform-automation), or GPU serving deployments (use infra-deployer).

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • GoZippySkill

    repo-scout

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • BenjaminGSkill

    harness-review

    Turn one PR's review comments into harness fixes — classify each cause by the most solid place it can live (codebase, lint, rules, skill), then draft the fixes in a separate PR.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +6 more from naman10parikh

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    The #1 sprint planning failure: No sprint goal. Without a goal, the sprint is just a bag of tickets.

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    If no velocity history: Use 60% of theoretical capacity for the first sprint.

    line 69
  3. Distinctive:

    Write the sprint goal BEFORE selecting stories.

    line 75
  4. Distinctive:

    All Must-haves for the sprint goal go in first

    line 124
  5. Distinctive:

    Never plan stretch items into committed capacity

    line 127
  6. Distinctive:

    If committed scope exceeds 80% of capacity, something needs to come out

    line 128
  7. Distinctive:

    Every deferred item has a "reason deferred" — respects the backlog

    line 211
  8. Very specific:

    After presenting the sprint plan, end with: "Ready for: /brief --audience team (to communicate the plan) or /brief --audience exec (for …

    line 214

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

{{PREAMBLE}}

Sprint Planning Mode

Philosophy

Sprint planning is not "grab the top N items from the backlog until capacity is full." It's the art of committing to the right work — work that delivers a coherent outcome, respects dependencies, accounts for interrupts, and leaves the team in a better position for NEXT sprint too.

The #1 sprint planning failure: No sprint goal. Without a goal, the sprint is just a bag of tickets. A team with a goal makes trade-offs during the sprint ("does this help the goal?"). A team without a goal just works down the list.

The #2 failure: 100% capacity utilization. A sprint planned to 100% capacity will fail. Teams need slack for code review, bug fixes, meetings, production incidents, and thinking. Plan to 70-80% capacity.

Inputs

Ask the user (via AskUserQuestion):

What inputs do we have for sprint planning?

RECOMMENDATION: Choose A if you have a prioritized backlog (from /prioritize or your own ranking). Otherwise B.

A) Prioritized backlog — I'll share the ranked list or point to Jira/Linear B) Unprioritized list of work — help me scope and plan from scratch C) Continuing from last sprint — carry over incomplete + add new work D) Emergency sprint — we need to react to something urgent

Also gather:

  • Sprint duration (1 week / 2 weeks / 3 weeks)
  • Team composition (who's available, any partial availability)
  • Known interrupts (on-call rotation, holidays, planned meetings)
  • Velocity history (average points completed in last 3 sprints, if available)

Step 1: Capacity Calculation

SPRINT CAPACITY
═══════════════
Sprint: [Sprint name/number] — [Start date] to [End date] ([N] working days)

| Team Member | Available Days | Role | Allocated % | Effective Points |
|-------------|---------------|------|------------|-----------------|
| [Name] | [N] of [Total] | [Dev/Design/QA] | [80%*] | [Calculated] |
| [Name] | [N] of [Total] | [Dev/Design/QA] | [80%*] | [Calculated] |

* 80% default accounts for meetings, reviews, interrupts. Adjust if known.

Total Capacity: ___ points
Recommended Commitment: ___ points (75% of capacity — leaves buffer)
Historical Velocity: ___ points/sprint (avg of last 3)
Planning Target: min(Recommended Commitment, Historical Velocity) = ___ points

If no velocity history: Use 60% of theoretical capacity for the first sprint. Measure, then calibrate.


Step 2: Sprint Goal

Write the sprint goal BEFORE selecting stories. The goal shapes which stories get pulled in.

SPRINT GOAL
═══════════
"By the end of this sprint, [specific user/stakeholder] will be able to
[specific capability or outcome] because [specific deliverables] are complete."

Success test: [How the team knows the goal is met — demo scenario or acceptance test]

Sprint goal rules:

  • One goal, not three. If you have three goals, you have zero goals.
  • Stated in terms of outcomes, not outputs. Not "complete 8 stories" — "users can search docs in natural language."
  • The team should be able to demo the goal in 5 minutes at sprint review.

Step 3: Story Selection

Pull stories from the backlog into the sprint, guided by the sprint goal.

COMMITTED SCOPE (≤75% of capacity)
═══════════════════════════════════
| # | Story | Points | Priority | Dependency | Sprint Goal? |
|---|-------|--------|----------|-----------|-------------|
| 1 | [Story title] | [N] | Must-have | None | ✓ Yes |
| 2 | [Story title] | [N] | Must-have | #1 | ✓ Yes |
| 3 | [Story title] | [N] | Should-have | None | ✓ Yes |
| 4 | [Story title] | [N] | Should-have | None | Supports |

Committed Points: ___ / ___ capacity (___%)

STRETCH ITEMS (if committed scope finishes early)
═════════════════════════════════════════════════
| # | Story | Points | Why stretch | Pull trigger |
|---|-------|--------|------------|-------------|
| S1 | [Story] | [N] | [Lower priority] | Pull if ___ points remain by day [N] |
| S2 | [Story] | [N] | [Nice to have] | Pull if ___ points remain by day [N] |

EXPLICITLY DEFERRED (in backlog but NOT this sprint)
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
| Story | Points | Reason deferred |
|-------|--------|----------------|
| [Story] | [N] | [Why — dependency, capacity, not aligned with goal] |

Selection rules:

  • All Must-haves for the sprint goal go in first
  • Then Should-haves that support the goal
  • Then Should-haves that don't relate to the goal (if capacity remains)
  • Never plan stretch items into committed capacity
  • If committed scope exceeds 80% of capacity, something needs to come out

Step 4: Dependency & Risk Map

DEPENDENCY CHAIN
════════════════
Day 1-2: [Story #1] (no dependencies — start immediately)
Day 1-3: [Story #4] (no dependencies — start immediately)
Day 3-5: [Story #2] (blocked until #1 is code-complete)
Day 4-7: [Story #3] (can start after #2 design is approved)

         #1 ──→ #2 ──→ #3
         #4 (independent)

Critical path: #1 → #2 → #3 (must start by Day 1 or sprint goal at risk)

RISKS
═════
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|-----------|
| [Story #2 more complex than estimated] | Medium | High — blocks #3 | Spike first day, re-estimate by Day 2 |
| [Team member out sick] | Low | Medium | Stories #1 and #4 can absorb from either dev |
| [External API dependency] | Low | High — blocks #2 | Have fallback mock ready |

Step 5: Ceremony Plan

SPRINT CEREMONIES
═════════════════
| Ceremony | When | Duration | Attendees | Agenda |
|----------|------|----------|-----------|--------|
| Sprint Planning | Day 1, [time] | 1-2 hrs | Full team | Review goal, commit scope, assign |
| Daily Standup | Daily, [time] | 15 min | Full team | Blockers, progress against goal |
| Backlog Refinement | Day [N], [time] | 1 hr | PM + leads | Refine next sprint candidates |
| Sprint Review | Last day, [time] | 30 min | Team + stakeholders | Demo sprint goal |
| Sprint Retro | Last day, [time] | 45 min | Full team | What worked, what didn't, actions |

Step 6: Sprint Summary

SPRINT PLAN SUMMARY
══════════════════════════════════════
Sprint: [Name/Number]
Duration: [Start] → [End] ([N] days)
Goal: "[Sprint goal in one sentence]"

| Metric | Value |
|──────────────────|────────────────|
| Team size | ___ members |
| Capacity | ___ points |
| Committed | ___ points (___%) |
| Stretch | ___ points |
| Stories | ___ committed, ___ stretch |
| Must-haves | ___ |
| Dependencies | ___ blocking chains |
| Risks | ___ identified, ___ high |
══════════════════════════════════════

Day 1 actions:
1. [Who] starts [Story] — no blockers
2. [Who] starts [Story] — no blockers
3. [Who] spikes [Story] — needs re-estimate by EOD

Mid-sprint check (Day [N]):
- Is critical path on track? (#1 → #2 → #3)
- Any stretch items ready to pull?
- Any committed items at risk?

Formatting Rules

  • Sprint goal is stated in quotes, user-outcome language
  • Capacity table shows the math — no hidden assumptions
  • Committed vs. Stretch is a hard line, not a gradient
  • Every deferred item has a "reason deferred" — respects the backlog
  • Risks have mitigations, not just descriptions
  • Day 1 actions are specific: who starts what
  • After presenting the sprint plan, end with: "Ready for: /brief --audience team (to communicate the plan) or /brief --audience exec (for leadership update)"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.