agentleFS
VECTORG99VECTORG99/acf/skills/02-stack-audit/SKILL.md

stack-audit

Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Phase 2 of ACF. Audits the open GitHub stack for orphan PRs, unclosed issues, missing issue↔PR references, and library opportunities. Use when ACF delegates stack analysis, or when the user asks to "check the stack", "find orphan PRs", "review open issues", or "what's missing in the stack".

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions2 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 2

    1. patmeh1/product-docs-kit★ 0same name
    2. truemetal74/skills★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do NOT bundle it into the current issue

    line 77
  2. Very specific:

    Create a separate enhancement issue with labels enhancement + library-review

    line 78
  3. Distinctive:

    Write findings to the progress file:

    line 90
  4. Very specific:

    Use --limit 200 or higher if the API allows it

    line 120
  5. Distinctive:

    Document in the findings if pagination was used and whether all pages were consumed

    line 129
  6. Very specific:

    gh not authenticated: run gh auth status to confirm.

    line 150
  7. Very specific:

    GitHub API rate limits: if a gh command returns a rate limit error, stop and report "GitHub API rate limited — retry after [reset time].

    line 153
  8. Very specific:

    Commands fail: if a gh command fails (network error, permission denied), record the error in findings as [check name]: failed — [error …

    line 160

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stack-Audit

Detects gaps in the issue↔PR pipeline so nothing escapes the current stack.

Checks

1. Orphan PRs (PR with no issue reference)

gh pr list --state open --json number,title,body,headRefName

For each PR, check if the body contains Closes #N, Fixes #N, Refs #N, or Resolves #N. If none found → orphan PR.

Flag: orphan-pr label suggestion + comment recommending issue creation.

2. Stale Issues (issue ready/in-progress with no PR)

gh issue list --state open --json number,title,labels

For each issue with label ready-to-implement (or equivalent), check if there's an open PR referencing it. If not → stale issue.

Flag: comment with "No PR open for this issue — consider creating one or closing if obsolete."

3. Merged PR, Issue Still Open

gh pr list --state merged --json number,title,body --limit 100

For each merged PR with Closes #N, verify issue #N is closed. If open → close gap.

Action: do not close automatically. Surface the gap in the findings list and let the user confirm. Only after explicit user approval run:

gh issue close #N --reason completed

Closing an issue is a state change on the tracker; never perform it without user confirmation, and never batch-close multiple issues in one pass.

4. Closed Issue, No Merged PR

gh issue list --state closed --json number,title,body --limit 100

For each closed issue, check if there's a merged PR referencing it. If not → escaped issue (closed without implementation evidence).

Flag: escaped-issue label suggestion. May need reopening or a follow-up issue.

5. Library Opportunities

During context-load and stack-audit, if a dependency or library could simplify the solution to an open issue:

  • Do NOT bundle it into the current issue
  • Create a separate enhancement issue with labels enhancement + library-review
  • Reference it from the main issue: Related: #NN (library review)

The library-review issue should contain:

  • Library name and link
  • What problem it solves
  • Which open issues it could improve
  • Trade-offs (license, bundle size, maintenance status)

Output

Write findings to the progress file:

## Stack-Audit Findings

### Orphan PRs
- PR #NN "title" — no issue reference

### Stale Issues
- Issue #NN "title" — no open PR

### Close Gaps
- PR #NN merged but issue #MM still open

### Escaped Issues
- Issue #NN closed but no merged PR

### Library Opportunities
- [library name] could simplify issue #NN — create enhancement issue

Parallel Execution

Stack-audit can run in parallel with context-load. Both feed into issue-craft.

Pagination

The default --limit is set to 100 (not 20) to cover most repos in a single call. For very large repos with more than 100 open/merged items:

  • Use --limit 200 or higher if the API allows it
  • Make multiple paginated calls with --limit 100 and track the last seen number to avoid duplicates
  • For targeted queries, use gh search prs / gh search issues with search terms instead of listing everything:
    gh search prs --state open --review-requested @me
    gh search issues --state open --label "ready-to-implement"
  • Document in the findings if pagination was used and whether all pages were consumed

Empty State Handling

  • No open issues: report Open issues: 0 and note "No open issues — stack is clean or tracker is unused." Proceed to PR checks.
  • No open PRs: report Open PRs: 0 and note "No open PRs." Proceed to issue checks.
  • No issues AND no PRs: report "Empty stack — no issues or PRs found. Repo may be new or gh may lack access." Suggest verifying gh auth status.
  • No merged PRs: skip check 3 (close gaps). Note "No merged PRs — close gap check skipped."
  • No closed issues: skip check 4 (escaped issues). Note "No closed issues — escaped issue check skipped."

Error Handling

  • gh CLI not installed: stack-audit cannot run without gh. Report "gh CLI not found — stack-audit skipped. Install: https://cli.github.com/" and continue with context-load only.
  • gh not authenticated: run gh auth status to confirm. If not authed, report "gh not authenticated — run gh auth login and retry." Do not attempt to authenticate automatically.
  • GitHub API rate limits: if a gh command returns a rate limit error, stop and report "GitHub API rate limited — retry after [reset time]. Partial findings may be incomplete." Note which checks completed and which were skipped.
  • Required files/directories don't exist: stack-audit operates on GitHub data, not local files. If the repo has no .github/ directory, that's expected — templates are checked by context-load, not stack-audit.
  • Commands fail: if a gh command fails (network error, permission denied), record the error in findings as [check name]: failed — [error message] and continue with the next check. Do not abort the entire audit.

Example

Filled-in findings for a sample project:

## Stack-Audit Findings

### Orphan PRs
- PR #42 "feat: add leaderboard UI" — no issue reference

### Stale Issues
- Issue #17 "fix: flashlight uses :Fire() instead of :FireServer()" — no open PR

### Close Gaps
- PR #38 merged but issue #29 still open — awaiting user confirmation

### Escaped Issues
- Issue #51 closed but no merged PR — may need follow-up

### Library Opportunities
- Roact could simplify issue #17 (UI state management) — create enhancement issue

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.