build
Skill1 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Feature development pipeline - research, plan, track, and implement major features.
156 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jskswamy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lilly-builds/senior-engineer-modetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DnsQueen/orcinus-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use backprop, finances and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JuliusBrusseeSkillbackprop
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GerardoRdz96Skillfinances
Use when Gera talks about his money — logging an expense ("I spent X on Y"), checking where he stands this pay-period, closing a period, planning debt payoff, onboarding his financial picture, or asking for budgeting/finance opinions. Servy's financial brain. Triggers — "I spent", "log this expense", "where am I this period", "close the period", "how's my budget", "debt plan", "should I pay off", "finances onboard", "/finances".
Also in 3 projects that use this
madeehahassanSkillGo-Live
Pre-launch checklist. Use before making any app public, sharing a link externally, or announcing a product launch. Adapts to Claude Code, claude.ai, and Cowork.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JuliusBrusseeSkilldeepen
Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent rewrites. Triggers when the user says "deepen this", "improve the design", "this module feels shallow", "pull complexity down", "use spare budget on the codebase", or invokes /ck:deepen. Leans on the codebase-design skill's deep-module vocabulary when present.
Also in 3 projects that use this
synaptiaiSkillgate
Create a BDSK review_gate artifact. Defines a checkpoint that controls whether generated output may proceed toward acceptance. Use when defining quality, security, or scope gates for execution plans.
Also in 5 projects that use this
TrevokeSkilldefine
Use when a new feature request, bug report, or work request needs requirements defined before implementation
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions156 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- cpiprint/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 1
- abineetsingh/ClaudeSkills★ 179% same
Wrote their own version · 154
- FalkorDB/FalkorDB★ 10ksame name
- microsoft/microsoft-ui-xaml★ 8.6ksame name
- NexaAI/nexa-sdk★ 8.5ksame name
- hathach/tinyusb★ 7.3ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- pytorch/TensorRT★ 3ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- iPlug2/iPlug2★ 2.4ksame name
144 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- chat-widgetSkill
- conductor-setupSkill
- faviconSkill
- issuesSkill
- new-rails-projectSkill
- readmeSkill
- screenshotsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
56 rules. 0 are common, 39 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 142 edited versions we read keep these.
39
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
17
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
If the feature name is not provided in arguments, you MUST use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
- Distinctive: line 34
If no arguments provided, display this help:
- Distinctive: line 72
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion:
- Very specific: line 83
Check if docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md already exists.
- Distinctive: line 85
If it exists, use AskUserQuestion:
- Very specific: line 98
If "Skip" selected, suggest running /build implementation {name} and exit.
- Distinctive: line 102
Use AskUserQuestion to understand the feature:
- Very specific: line 148
Create the directory if needed: docs/{name}/
- Very specific: line 150
Write findings to docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md with this structure:
- Distinctive: line 196
After writing the research doc, inform the user:
- Very specific: line 200
Next step: Run /build implementation {name} to create a phased implementation plan."
- Distinctive: line 208
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it (same as research phase).
- Very specific: line 212
Check if docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md exists.
- Distinctive: line 214
If it does NOT exist:
- Very specific: line 240
Read docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md to understand:
- Distinctive: line 255
Use AskUserQuestion to validate phase breakdown:
- Distinctive: line 275
Use AskUserQuestion for any uncertainties about phase ordering or scope.
- Very specific: line 279
Write to docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md with this structure:
- Distinctive: line 337
After writing the implementation doc, inform the user:
- Very specific: line 341
Next step: Run /build progress {name} to set up progress tracking."
- Distinctive: line 349
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
- Distinctive: line 375
If "Keep existing" selected, read the progress doc and suggest the next incomplete phase.
- Very specific: line 379
Read docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md to extract:
- Distinctive: line 447
After creating progress doc:
- Very specific: line 451
Next step: Run /build phase 1 {name} to begin implementation."
- Distinctive: line 463
If neither provided, prompt for both using AskUserQuestion.
- Distinctive: line 467
If feature name not determined, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
- Distinctive: line 471
Check that all three docs exist:
- Very specific: line 476
If any missing, inform user which doc is missing and suggest the appropriate /build command to create it.
- Distinctive: line 480
If phase number not in arguments:
- Very specific: line 482
Read docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md to extract available phases.
- Distinctive: line 484
Use AskUserQuestion to let user select:
- Distinctive: line 493
Read all three documents to fully understand:
- Distinctive: line 511
Use AskUserQuestion frequently for implementation decisions
- Distinctive: line 512
Follow the "Always Works" philosophy - test as you go
- Distinctive: line 513
Document decisions in PROGRESS.md as you make them
- Distinctive: line 524
Update the session log with today's work
- Distinctive: line 526
Update the phase status:
- Distinctive: line 532
After completing the phase:
- Distinctive: line 534
Read PROGRESS.md to determine next incomplete phase
- Very specific: line 539
Next step: Run /build phase {n+1} {name} to continue with [next phase title]."
- Distinctive: line 560
Check for existence of:
- Very specific: line 571
Next step: Run /build research {name} to start."
- Very specific: line 575
Next step: Run /build implementation {name} to create implementation plan."
- Distinctive: line 582
Read PROGRESS.md to find current phase status.
- Very specific: line 585
Next step: Run /build phase {next incomplete phase} {name} to continue."
- Distinctive: line 587
If all phases complete: "Feature '{name}' implementation is complete!"
- Distinctive: line 612
Don't rush through research - it's the foundation for good implementation.
- Distinctive: line 616
Keep PROGRESS.md updated in real-time during phase work:
- Distinctive: line 617
Don't wait until the end to update
- Distinctive: line 626
If new requirements emerge, note them for future phases
- Distinctive: line 627
Don't expand the current phase's scope mid-implementation
- Distinctive: line 628
Use AskUserQuestion to validate if something is in/out of scope
- Distinctive: line 633
Test changes as you make them
- Distinctive: line 634
Don't assume code works - verify it
- Distinctive: line 635
If something doesn't work, fix it before moving on
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 142 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature development pipeline - research, plan, track, and implement major features.
Instructions
This command manages a 4-phase feature development workflow for building major features. Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine which subcommand to run.
Arguments provided: $ARGUMENTS
Argument Parsing
Parse the first word of $ARGUMENTS to determine the subcommand:
research [name]→ Run the Research phaseimplementation [name]→ Run the Implementation phaseprogress [name]→ Run the Progress phasephase [n] [name]→ Run Phase n of the implementationstatus [name]→ Show current status and suggest next step- (empty or unrecognized) → Show usage help
If the feature name is not provided in arguments, you MUST use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
Subcommand: Help (empty args)
If no arguments provided, display this help:
/build - Feature Development Pipeline
Subcommands:
/build research [name] Deep research on a feature idea
/build implementation [name] Create phased implementation plan
/build progress [name] Set up progress tracking
/build phase [n] [name] Execute implementation phase n
/build status [name] Show status and next steps
Example workflow:
/build research chat-interface
/build implementation chat-interface
/build progress chat-interface
/build phase 1 chat-interfaceThen use AskUserQuestion to ask what they'd like to do:
- question: "What would you like to do?"
- header: "Action"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "Start new feature research" description: "Begin deep research on a new feature idea"
- label: "Continue existing feature" description: "Work on a feature already in progress"
- label: "Check status" description: "See what step to do next for a feature"
Subcommand: research
Step 1: Get Feature Name
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion:
- question: "What's a short identifier for this feature? (lowercase, hyphens ok - e.g., 'chat-interface', 'user-auth', 'data-export'). Use 'Other' to type it."
- header: "Feature name"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "I'll type the name" description: "Enter a short, kebab-case identifier for the feature"
Step 2: Check for Existing Research
Check if docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md already exists.
If it exists, use AskUserQuestion:
- question: "A RESEARCH.md already exists for this feature. What would you like to do?"
- header: "Existing doc"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "Overwrite" description: "Replace existing research with fresh exploration"
- label: "Append" description: "Add new research below existing content"
- label: "Skip" description: "Keep existing research, suggest next step"
If "Skip" selected, suggest running /build implementation {name} and exit.
Step 3: Gather Feature Context
Use AskUserQuestion to understand the feature:
- question: "Describe the feature you want to build. What problem does it solve? What should it do? (Use 'Other' to describe)"
- header: "Description"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "I'll describe it" description: "Provide a detailed description of the feature"
Step 4: Research Scope
Use AskUserQuestion:
- question: "What aspects should the research focus on?"
- header: "Focus areas"
- multiSelect: true
- options:
- label: "Technical implementation" description: "APIs, libraries, architecture patterns"
- label: "UI/UX design" description: "Interface design, user flows, interactions"
- label: "Data requirements" description: "What data to store, schemas, privacy"
- label: "Platform capabilities" description: "OS APIs, system integrations, permissions"
Step 5: Conduct Deep Research
Now conduct DEEP research on the feature:
- Codebase exploration: Understand existing patterns, similar features, relevant code
- Web search: Research best practices, similar implementations, relevant APIs
- Technical deep-dive: Explore specific technologies, libraries, frameworks
- Use AskUserQuestion FREQUENTLY: Validate assumptions, clarify requirements, get input on decisions
Research should cover:
- Problem definition and user needs
- Technical approaches and trade-offs
- Required data models and storage
- UI/UX considerations
- Integration points with existing code
- Potential challenges and risks
- Recommended approach with rationale
Step 6: Write Research Document
Create the directory if needed: docs/{name}/
Write findings to docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md with this structure:
# {Feature Name} Research
## Overview
[Brief description of the feature and its purpose]
## Problem Statement
[What problem this solves, why it matters]
## User Stories / Use Cases
[Concrete examples of how users will use this]
## Technical Research
### Approach Options
[Different ways to implement this, with pros/cons]
### Recommended Approach
[The approach you recommend and why]
### Required Technologies
[APIs, libraries, frameworks needed]
### Data Requirements
[What data needs to be stored/tracked]
## UI/UX Considerations
[Interface design thoughts, user flows]
## Integration Points
[How this connects to existing code/features]
## Risks and Challenges
[Potential issues and mitigation strategies]
## Open Questions
[Things that still need to be decided]
## References
[Links to relevant documentation, examples, articles]Step 7: Next Step
After writing the research doc, inform the user:
"Research complete! Document saved to docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md
Next step: Run /build implementation {name} to create a phased implementation plan."
Subcommand: implementation
Step 1: Get Feature Name
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it (same as research phase).
Step 2: Verify Research Exists
Check if docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md exists.
If it does NOT exist:
- Inform user: "No research document found at
docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md" - Suggest: "Run
/build research {name}first to create the research document." - Exit
Step 3: Check for Existing Implementation Doc
Check if docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md already exists.
If it exists, use AskUserQuestion:
- question: "An IMPLEMENTATION.md already exists. What would you like to do?"
- header: "Existing doc"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "Overwrite" description: "Create a fresh implementation plan"
- label: "Append" description: "Add new phases below existing content"
- label: "Skip" description: "Keep existing plan, suggest next step"
If "Skip" selected, suggest running /build progress {name} and exit.
Step 4: Read Research Document
Read docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md to understand:
- The recommended approach
- Technical requirements
- Data models needed
- UI/UX design
- Integration points
Step 5: Design Implementation Phases
Break the research into practical implementation phases. Each phase should:
- Be independently valuable (deliver something usable)
- Be small enough to complete in a focused session
- Build on previous phases
- Have clear success criteria
Use AskUserQuestion to validate phase breakdown:
- question: "How granular should the implementation phases be?"
- header: "Phase size"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "Small phases (1-2 hours)" description: "Many focused phases, easier to track progress"
- label: "Medium phases (half day)" description: "Balanced approach, moderate number of phases"
- label: "Large phases (full day)" description: "Fewer phases, each delivering significant functionality"
Step 6: Conduct Phase Research
For each phase you're planning, do targeted research:
- Web search for implementation specifics
- Review relevant code in the codebase
- Identify dependencies between phases
Use AskUserQuestion for any uncertainties about phase ordering or scope.
Step 7: Write Implementation Document
Write to docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md with this structure:
# {Feature Name} Implementation Plan
## Overview
[Brief recap of what we're building and the approach from research]
## Prerequisites
[What needs to be in place before starting]
## Phase Summary
[Quick overview of all phases]
---
## Phase 1: [Phase Title]
### Objective
[What this phase accomplishes]
### Rationale
[Why this phase comes first, what it enables]
### Tasks
- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Task 3
### Success Criteria
[How to verify this phase is complete]
### Files Likely Affected
[List of files that will probably need changes]
---
## Phase 2: [Phase Title]
[Same structure as Phase 1]
---
[Continue for all phases]
---
## Post-Implementation
- [ ] Documentation updates
- [ ] Testing strategy
- [ ] Performance validation
## Notes
[Any additional context or decisions made during planning]Step 8: Next Step
After writing the implementation doc, inform the user:
"Implementation plan complete! Document saved to docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md
Next step: Run /build progress {name} to set up progress tracking."
Subcommand: progress
Step 1: Get Feature Name
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
Step 2: Verify Implementation Doc Exists
Check if docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md exists.
If it does NOT exist:
- Inform user: "No implementation document found at
docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md" - Suggest: "Run
/build implementation {name}first." - Exit
Step 3: Check for Existing Progress Doc
Check if docs/{name}/PROGRESS.md already exists.
If it exists, use AskUserQuestion:
- question: "A PROGRESS.md already exists. What would you like to do?"
- header: "Existing doc"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
- label: "Overwrite" description: "Start fresh progress tracking"
- label: "Keep existing" description: "Keep current progress, suggest next step"
If "Keep existing" selected, read the progress doc and suggest the next incomplete phase.
Step 4: Read Implementation Document
Read docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md to extract:
- All phase titles
- Tasks within each phase
- Success criteria
Step 5: Create Progress Document
Write to docs/{name}/PROGRESS.md with this structure:
# {Feature Name} Progress
## Status: Phase 1 - Not Started
## Quick Reference
- Research: `docs/{name}/RESEARCH.md`
- Implementation: `docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md`
---
## Phase Progress
### Phase 1: [Title from Implementation]
**Status:** Not Started
#### Tasks Completed
- (none yet)
#### Decisions Made
- (none yet)
#### Blockers
- (none)
---
### Phase 2: [Title]
**Status:** Not Started
[Same structure]
---
[Continue for all phases]
---
## Session Log
### [Date will be added as work happens]
- Work completed
- Decisions made
- Notes for next session
---
## Files Changed
(Will be updated as implementation progresses)
## Architectural Decisions
(Major technical decisions and rationale)
## Lessons Learned
(What worked, what didn't, what to do differently)Step 6: Next Step
After creating progress doc:
"Progress tracking set up! Document saved to docs/{name}/PROGRESS.md
Next step: Run /build phase 1 {name} to begin implementation."
Subcommand: phase
Step 1: Parse Arguments
Parse arguments to extract:
- Phase number (if provided)
- Feature name (if provided)
If neither provided, prompt for both using AskUserQuestion.
Step 2: Get Feature Name
If feature name not determined, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
Step 3: Verify All Docs Exist
Check that all three docs exist:
docs/{name}/RESEARCH.mddocs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.mddocs/{name}/PROGRESS.md
If any missing, inform user which doc is missing and suggest the appropriate /build command to create it.
Step 4: Get Phase Number
If phase number not in arguments:
Read docs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.md to extract available phases.
Use AskUserQuestion to let user select:
- question: "Which phase would you like to work on?"
- header: "Phase"
- multiSelect: false
- options: [dynamically generated from phases found in IMPLEMENTATION.md, marking completed ones]
Step 5: Read All Context
Read all three documents to fully understand:
- The research and rationale (RESEARCH.md)
- The specific phase tasks and success criteria (IMPLEMENTATION.md)
- Current progress and decisions made (PROGRESS.md)
Step 6: Deep Research on Phase
Before starting implementation:
- Web search for specific implementation details relevant to this phase
- Codebase exploration for relevant existing code
- Use AskUserQuestion to clarify any ambiguities about the phase requirements
Step 7: Execute Phase Work
Begin implementing the phase:
- Work through each task in the phase
- Use AskUserQuestion frequently for implementation decisions
- Follow the "Always Works" philosophy - test as you go
- Document decisions in PROGRESS.md as you make them
Step 8: Update Progress Document
As you work, update docs/{name}/PROGRESS.md:
- Mark tasks as completed
- Record decisions made and why
- Note any blockers encountered
- List files changed
- Add architectural decisions
- Update the session log with today's work
Update the phase status:
- "In Progress" when starting
- "Completed" when all tasks done and success criteria met
Step 9: Next Step
After completing the phase:
- Read PROGRESS.md to determine next incomplete phase
- Inform user of completion and suggest next action:
"Phase {n} complete! Progress updated in docs/{name}/PROGRESS.md
Next step: Run /build phase {n+1} {name} to continue with [next phase title]."
Or if all phases complete:
"All phases complete! The {feature name} feature implementation is done.
Consider:
- Running tests to verify everything works
- Updating documentation
- Creating a PR for review"
Subcommand: status
Step 1: Get Feature Name
If feature name not in arguments, use AskUserQuestion to prompt for it.
Step 2: Check Which Docs Exist
Check for existence of:
docs/{name}/RESEARCH.mddocs/{name}/IMPLEMENTATION.mddocs/{name}/PROGRESS.md
Step 3: Determine Status and Next Step
Based on which docs exist:
No docs exist:
"No documents found for feature '{name}'.
Next step: Run /build research {name} to start."
Only RESEARCH.md exists:
"Research complete for '{name}'.
Next step: Run /build implementation {name} to create implementation plan."
RESEARCH.md and IMPLEMENTATION.md exist:
"Research and implementation plan complete for '{name}'.
Next step: Run /build progress {name} to set up progress tracking."
All three exist:
Read PROGRESS.md to find current phase status.
"Feature '{name}' is in progress.
Current status: [Phase X - status]
Next step: Run /build phase {next incomplete phase} {name} to continue."
If all phases complete: "Feature '{name}' implementation is complete!"
Important Guidelines
Use AskUserQuestion Liberally
Throughout all phases, use AskUserQuestion whenever:
- There's ambiguity in requirements
- Multiple approaches are possible
- You need to validate an assumption
- A decision will significantly impact the implementation
- You're unsure about scope or priority
Deep Research Expectations
"Deep research" means:
- Multiple web searches on different aspects
- Thorough codebase exploration
- Reading relevant documentation
- Considering multiple approaches
- Understanding trade-offs
Don't rush through research - it's the foundation for good implementation.
Progress Tracking
Keep PROGRESS.md updated in real-time during phase work:
- Don't wait until the end to update
- Record decisions as they're made
- Note blockers immediately
- This creates valuable context for future sessions
Scope Management
A key purpose of this workflow is preventing scope creep:
- Each phase should have clear boundaries
- If new requirements emerge, note them for future phases
- Don't expand the current phase's scope mid-implementation
- Use AskUserQuestion to validate if something is in/out of scope
Always Works Philosophy
When implementing phases:
- Test changes as you make them
- Don't assume code works - verify it
- If something doesn't work, fix it before moving on
- The goal is working software, not just written code
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

