agentleFS
UtsavBalar1231UtsavBalar1231/oh-my-claudeagent/skills/plan/SKILL.md

plan

Skill3 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub

Create a strategic work plan via a planner-style interview and structured plan drafting.

184 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use heartmula, webhook-subscriptions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • math-incSkill

    heartmula

    Set up and run HeartMuLa, the open-source music generation model family (Suno-like). Generates full songs from lyrics + tags with multilingual support.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Tommy-ywSkill

    webhook-subscriptions

    Create and manage webhook subscriptions for event-driven agent activation, or for direct push notifications (zero LLM cost). Use when the user wants external services to trigger agent runs OR push notifications to chats.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • math-incSkill

    minecraft-modpack-server

    Set up a modded Minecraft server from a CurseForge/Modrinth server pack zip. Covers NeoForge/Forge install, Java version, JVM tuning, firewall, LAN config, backups, and launch scripts.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • john-data-chenSkill

    touchdesigner-mcp

    Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • gaebalaiSkill

    codex-system

    PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ibahgatSkill

    context-optimize

    Improve context efficiency and cache stability for long or complex sessions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from math-inc

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 167 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Call health_check first, loading it if needed: ToolSearch({query: "select:mcp__plugin_oh-my-claudeagent_omca__health_check", max_results: …

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Phase 3, Handoff: After reviewer OKAY, confirm next steps with user via AskUserQuestion.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not read or tail the agent's output file: for a subagent it is the full JSONL transcript rather than a plain result, and reading it will …

    line 30

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 167 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Call health_check first, loading it if needed: ToolSearch({query: "select:mcp__plugin_oh-my-claudeagent_omca__health_check", max_results: 1}). Proceed only when runtime is ok; otherwise repeat runtime_reason to the user, tell them to run /oh-my-claudeagent:omca-setup, and stop. If the tool is still missing, say OMCA's server is not connected and stop.

Plan command: planner entrypoint

Invoke the planner protocol at depth 0, in this session. Run the protocol yourself rather than handing the plan to a planner subagent: a subagent runs without AskUserQuestion, and in a headless run its result may not land. User provides work description via $ARGUMENTS.

Protocol

Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/planner.md end-to-end:

Phase 1: Interview: Route on outcome clarity FIRST (CLEAR / VAGUE / UNSURE, planner.md Step 0); VAGUE skips the interview and applies announced defaults instead. Classify work intent (trivial/simple/complex/build/refactor/architecture/research). Apply Simple Request Detection. Run Exploration Gate: mandatory for Build from Scratch, Research, Architecture; scoped for Refactoring; skip for Trivial. Once exploration returns and before interviewing, write the plan file with **Status**: DRAFT on its metadata line, numbered - [ ] N. tasks from that first write (the plan-write validator denies a plan Write that has a ## TODOs or ## Work Objectives heading and no numbered task), and an ## Open questions section carrying a stated default per question. Interview against that file: the user corrects something concrete instead of answering abstract questions, so the interview gets shorter, not longer. Use AskUserQuestion for targeted interview questions; fall back to ## BLOCKING QUESTIONS block if unavailable. Run Self-Clearance Check after every interview turn. When every applicable checklist item is YES, auto-transition. When any item is NO, ask the specific unclear question.

Phase 2, Plan Generation: Consult the analyzer on the DRAFT, then update the plan in place to **Status**: FINAL. Do not call boulder_write: /oh-my-claudeagent:start-work registers the plan and binds the session that executes it. Write plan to <plans-dir>/{name}.md or the active plan-mode file. <plans-dir> is the plansDirectory setting when set (relative to the project root), otherwise ~/.claude/plans. Resolve it from settings instead of assuming the default, or the plan lands where nothing looks for it. When the user asks for a project-local plan, write to <project root>/.omca/plans/{name}.md instead. Put a companion file at <home>/{name}-<topic>.md beside the plan, or in an ## Appendix section of the plan, and nowhere else. Enforce task checkboxes (- [ ] N.). Run the reviewer review loop by invoking the oh-my-claudeagent:reviewer skill (via the Skill tool) with the plan file path, max 3 iterations until OKAY.

Phase 3, Handoff: After reviewer OKAY, confirm next steps with user via AskUserQuestion. Guide to /oh-my-claudeagent:start-work for execution.

Delegation

Delegate exploration to explorer agents (parallel when topics are independent). Delegate external research to researcher. Implementation belongs to /oh-my-claudeagent:start-work; this command neither implements nor delegates implementation.

A subagent's deliverable arrives in the <result> block of its <task-notification>, or as the Agent tool's return value where the platform ran it in the foreground; those are the only two places a result exists, so never claim a result you have not received in one of them. While an agent is outstanding, carry on with work that does not overlap what it was asked to do. Do not read or tail the agent's output file: for a subagent it is the full JSONL transcript rather than a plain result, and reading it will overflow your context. The OMCA Default output style carries the full statement of this, under "Claude Code".

Constraints

  • Planner only. No code. No task execution.
  • Single deliverable plan regardless of size.
  • Plans always in English.

Research and think-it-through requests

When the user wants to understand or research something rather than get a work plan ("help me understand X", "research Z", or an explicit ask to talk it through), the planner runs its interview-only dialogue before Phase 1. It asks questions that surface hidden constraints and clarify the problem through iterative dialogue, then returns a synthesis. It writes no plan file in this case. An underspecified request that does want a plan goes through the planner's outcome-clarity routing instead, which researches and announces defaults rather than handing the outcome back to the user.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.