agentleFS
UltralayerHQUltralayerHQ/ultralayer-plugin/skills/stakeholder-identification/SKILL.md

stakeholder-identification

Skill3 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Map a market situation to ranked public-company winners and losers with verified tickers, signed impact scores, cited quotes, and a factor comparison matrix. Operation is identify_stakeholders.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 3

    1. deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
    2. DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kit★ 12same name
    3. agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Approval for Agents: If a user is waiting on this turn (chat), tell them it takes ~2 minutes and get explicit approval before calling.

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Prefer a concrete situation over a vague theme.

    line 114
  3. Distinctive:

    Only verified public tickers are returned as stakeholders.

    line 116
  4. Distinctive:

    Use backfill for “what would an analyst have concluded knowing only info ≤ T?” Use realtime for “given the live tape, who is in the blast …

    line 127
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the matrix for “who is more exposed on dimension X?” Factor names are meant to be reusable across similar situations.

    line 149
  6. Distinctive:

    Call once; wait. On timeout, retry once — do not fan out parallel SI calls.

    line 166
  7. Distinctive:

    Not a price target or trading signal — impact scores are reasoned exposures with citations.

    line 177
  8. Distinctive:

    Does not return countries/commodities as stakeholders even when they dominate the narrative.

    line 180

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Stakeholder identification

identify_stakeholders answers “who matters for this situation, and why?” It retrieves finance-specific evidence, returns structured public-company impacts with cited quotes, verifies tickers, and ships a factor comparison matrix.

OperationRole
identify_stakeholdersSituation → ranked stakeholders + factor matrix

Latency: commonly ~2 minutes. Budget for that. Do not treat timeouts as “empty universe.” Do not spam parallel calls.

Approval for Agents: If a user is waiting on this turn (chat), tell them it takes ~2 minutes and get explicit approval before calling. If no one is waiting (one-shot / autonomous / unattended), call and wait.


When to use

Use when you need:

  • Ranked public-company winners/losers for a market situation, with direction + magnitude
  • Why each name is exposed (rationale) plus auditable quotes
  • A factor matrix to compare the returned names at a glance
  • Backtest-safe identification as-of a historical end_timestamp

Do not use when you need:

  • Fast headline triage → Wire
  • Open-web research (article body, quotes, filings, prices) → your native web search tool
  • One company’s live dossier → retrieve_entity
  • Already-stored development packages → search_developments (SI creates fresh assessments; developments store prior ones)
  • Non-company stakeholders (countries, commodities, people, private cos) → out of scope (PUBLIC_COMPANY only)

Generic LLMs invent tickers; this endpoint retrieves evidence, cites exact quotes, verifies symbols, and returns a reusable factor table — with optional point-in-time mode.


Use cases

Realtime supply shock — Map who wins and loses if a concrete market shock hits, with verified tickers and cited reasons.

{
  "query": "Strait of Hormuz near-total closure and oil supply shock"
}

Realtime with steering — Same exposure map, but steer coverage toward second-order names and keep the list tight.

{
  "query": "Tesla Q2 2026 earnings miss and margin compression",
  "context": "EPS well below consensus; operating margin ~1.4%; negative FCF; energy storage strong.",
  "instructions": "Prioritize clear second-order exposures (EV peers, suppliers, AI compute). Prefer fewer high-confidence names."
}

Historical / backtest — Ask who mattered as of a past date, without live-web leakage after that cutoff.

{
  "query": "Apple CEO succession Tim Cook to John Ternus",
  "end_timestamp": "2026-04-25T00:00:00Z"
}

Constrained universe — Force a short, sector-balanced list instead of a long undifferentiated dump.

{
  "query": "who benefits from rising oil prices",
  "instructions": "Return at most 6 public companies spanning upstream, midstream, and airlines as losers."
}

Regulation / tariffs — Identify listed companies with clear regulatory exposure for a policy action.

{
  "query": "EU Digital Markets Act fines on Big Tech self-preferencing",
  "instructions": "Focus on listed platforms and ad-tech peers with clear regulatory exposure."
}

Response detail

identify_stakeholders accepts detail. Default is full. Reduced levels drop keys only — surviving fields keep the same names and paths as full. Pricing does not change with detail; this is about response token cost in the agent context (especially valuable here — SI payloads are large).

LevelWhat you getRough token savings vs full
essentialStakeholders with impact + rationale; factor matrix with name/description/value/rationale (no sources, no confidence, no rubrics/scale)~80%
standardessential + confidence, factor scale/rubric, and citable sources (no quotes)~31%
fullEvery field including source quotes and full factor definitions—

Prefer detail: "standard" for normal agent calls. Use essential for a cheap ranked map; use full when you need auditable quotes in the payload.

{
  "query": "Strait of Hormuz near-total closure and oil supply shock",
  "detail": "standard"
}

Params

ParamRole
query (required)The situation. Non-empty after strip; blank → 422. Max 2000 characters.
contextExtra facts about the situation (what happened, numbers, constraints). Max 12000 characters.
instructionsHow to shape the answer (coverage, count, sectors to prefer/avoid) — not treated as the search subject. Max 2000 characters.
end_timestampOmit/null = realtime. Past = backfill. Future → realtime. No start_timestamp.
detailDefault full. Prefer standard (see detail above).

Prefer a concrete situation over a vague theme. Put hard facts in context; put process prefs in instructions ("Prefer fewer high-confidence names", "At most 6 names"). Instructions work — they change count and composition.

Only verified public tickers are returned as stakeholders.


Realtime vs backfill

ModeTriggerBehavior
Realtimeend_timestamp null/futureUses live web retrieval plus historical structured SI context
Backfillpast end_timestampNo live web. Evidence from indexed corpus and historical SI context clamped to end_timestamp — backtest-safe

Use backfill for “what would an analyst have concluded knowing only info ≤ T?” Use realtime for “given the live tape, who is in the blast radius?”

Returned tickers are verified; unverified names are dropped.


What you get back

stakeholder_impacts[]

  • stakeholder: { name, stakeholder_type: "PUBLIC_COMPANY", symbol }
  • impact_score ∈ [-1, 1]
  • confidence_score ∈ [0, 1]
  • rationale
  • sources_with_quotes[] — exact quotes with source metadata

Scan strongest positives and strongest negatives first.

factor_matrix[]

Rows = situation-specific factors. Each has name (snake_case), description, factor_scale, rubric, optional allowed_values, and stakeholder_assessments keyed by symbol.

Scales: BINARY | CATEGORICAL | CONTINUOUS [0,1] | SIGNED_CONTINUOUS [-1,1].

Use the matrix for “who is more exposed on dimension X?” Factor names are meant to be reusable across similar situations. A factor row may occasionally omit a symbol — treat missing cells as unknown, not zero.


Workflow

User intentApproach
“Who wins/loses if X?”Realtime SI on a precise query; brief from impact extremes + factor matrix
“As of date D, who mattered?”Same query + past end_timestamp
“Keep it short / sector-focused”Put constraints in instructions
“Drill one ticker after SI”retrieve_entity, Wire, or developments with symbols
“Just give me headlines”Wire — do not pay SI latency for firehose
  1. Confirm the user wants situation → public-company exposure.
  2. Craft a specific query; add context / instructions only when they sharpen the job.
  3. Get approval if applicable: If you are an interactive chat agent, and there is a user waiting, get approval for the ~2 min wait before calling.
  4. Call once; wait. On timeout, retry once — do not fan out parallel SI calls.
  5. Brief: top ± impacts → factor matrix highlights → cite 1–2 quotes per key name.
  6. Offer follow-ups via Wire / developments / retrieve_entity / your native web search tool using returned symbols.

Limitations

  • Slow — plan for ~2 minutes; avoid speculative retries and fan-out.
  • Public companies only; listing suffixes vary (SMSN.IL, BYDDF, AMKBY).
  • Verification can drop proposed names — final list ⊆ verified survivors.
  • Not a price target or trading signal — impact scores are reasoned exposures with citations.
  • Backfill quality depends on indexed corpus ≤ T.
  • Factor matrix is built per call — read names/rubrics; don’t assume identical every time.
  • Does not return countries/commodities as stakeholders even when they dominate the narrative.

FAQ

Q: Why is this better than asking a normal agent?
A: Retrieval + quote binding + ticker verification + factor matrix + backtest mode.

Q: Future end_timestamp — historical or live?
A: Treated as realtime.

Q: Can I get private cos / OPEC / Brent as stakeholders?
A: Not as structured stakeholders. They may appear in rationales/sources only.

Q: How do I continue after SI?
A: Take symbols → Wire filters, search_developments(symbols=…), retrieve_entity, or your native web search tool.

Q: Empty / whitespace query?
A: 422 query must be a non-empty string.

Q: Query / context / instructions too long?
A: 422. Caps are 2000 chars (query / instructions) and 12000 chars (context).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.