agentleFS
TylerAkinsTylerAkins/ai-agent-skills/skills/api-design/SKILL.md

api-design

Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Design and evolve API and module contracts with explicit behavior, validation, error semantics, authorization, and compatibility. Use for endpoints, schemas, service boundaries, SDKs, or shared interfaces. Follow existing protocol and repository conventions rather than imposing a new API style.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yuexueyuSkill

    db-design

    数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • InfopibeSkill

    everything-claude-code

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • tpavanipradeepSkill

    nextjs-turbopack

    Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • Indium-AI-LabsSkill

    data-pipeline-design

    Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • thejordanleopoldSkill

    third-party-integration

    Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read anti-ai-writing before drafting contracts, examples, or reports.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Use existing naming and error conventions.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Use types and schemas that distinguish valid variants without a bag of contradictory optional fields.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Use stable machine-readable errors with actionable public messages and safe details.

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    Use agent-planning for dependent multi-component work and writing-clean-simple-code for authorized implementation.

    line 81
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep schemas, examples, and relevant documentation consistent with the final behavior.

    line 88
  7. Distinctive:

    Use code-review for consequential contract review when available and authorized.

    line 89

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API and Interface Design

Read anti-ai-writing before drafting contracts, examples, or reports. Inspect existing interfaces, consumers, schemas, transport, framework versions, and repository conventions. Verify protocol and library semantics against official documentation. Design-only requests do not authorize implementation.

1. Establish the consumer contract

Identify the caller's task, boundary owner, trusted inputs, supported consumers, and accepted requirements. Use decision-partner only for consequential unresolved choices. Before implementation, define the relevant parts of the contract:

  • Data: inputs, outputs, required/optional fields, absent versus null semantics, defaults, units, identifiers, and constraints. Keep internal storage shapes and privileged fields out of public inputs unless required.
  • Behavior: errors, side effects, ordering, atomicity, concurrency, cancellation, retry behavior, and compatibility.

Use existing naming and error conventions; do not standardize the entire repository as a side effect. Keep the contract proportional to the interface's risk and reach.

2. Define misuse and failure behavior

Use types and schemas that distinguish valid variants without a bag of contradictory optional fields. Validate at actual trust boundaries, including external responses, configuration, and persisted data whose invariants are not guaranteed. Static types do not validate runtime data. Avoid redundant checks inside established trusted paths.

Enforce authentication, object/action authorization, and tenant scope in effective reads and writes. Derive identity from trusted context, not caller-selected ownership. Prevent over-posting, unsafe URLs, injection, and private-field disclosure. Define bounded inputs, resource use, and pagination consistent with the product's needs.

Use stable machine-readable errors with actionable public messages and safe details. Distinguish validation, authorization, missing resources, conflicts, transient failures, and unknown outcomes. Follow the transport's semantics and established disclosure policy; do not expose raw internals or assume every endpoint uses identical status codes.

Apply only the relevant transport rules:

  • For HTTP, preserve method, status, caching, conditional-request, and update semantics. Specify omission/null handling for partial updates and distinguish replacement from patching.
  • For GraphQL, consider nullability, resolver authorization, query cost, and schema evolution.
  • For events, specify delivery, ordering, schema, and replay contracts.

3. Define retries and collections

For retryable effects, define an intent-stable idempotency key, caller/tenant scope, payload mismatch handling, atomic claiming, in-flight responses, retention, and replay. Uniqueness alone does not ensure exactly-once external effects: account for crashes between the effect and result recording, downstream deduplication, and reconciliation of unknown outcomes. Do not retry an ambiguous non-idempotent operation blindly.

For collections, define filtering, maximum page size, stable ordering and tie-breakers, continuation validity, and behavior under concurrent inserts/deletes. Bind cursors to relevant query and scope without treating them as authorization. State partial results explicitly; counts and pagination metadata must not imply stronger consistency than the system provides.

4. Evolve and verify

Trace all supported producers and consumers, including generated clients, dynamic references, and deployed versions. Additive fields, enum values, and changed defaults can break strict consumers. Use safe-migrations for transitions requiring coexistence, deprecation, or breaking changes. Avoid inventing a new API version when compatible evolution satisfies the requirement.

Use agent-planning for dependent multi-component work and writing-clean-simple-code for authorized implementation. Use test-authoring for contract tests at real boundaries, including malformed inputs, authorization denial, tenant isolation, retry races, serialization, and compatibility as applicable. Verify actual consumer behavior rather than only mocks or schema validity.

Keep schemas, examples, and relevant documentation consistent with the final behavior. Use code-review for consequential contract review when available and authorized. Report decisions, actual verification, and unresolved consumer or execution limits. Publication and Git actions require applicable authorization.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.