ste-writing
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Rewrite prose (docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, error messages, release notes, comments, tool descriptions, system prompts — never code) into ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English to remove "AI slop". Use when asked to make writing not sound like AI, make docs clear or plain, enforce a controlled writing style, review text for STE violations, or write technical documentation that reads human. Two modes — strict (procedures/safety) and STE-flavored (general prose).
13 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tonkeeper/tonkeeper-webtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- LeonardiFranco/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xiduzo/wtfedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- vstorm-co/agenticosedited, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- norton77930/understanding-ai-outputstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- berkeley-humanoids/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use prototype and grilling.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillprototype
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrilling
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 6
- vstorm-co/agenticos★ 24168% same
- xiduzo/wtf★ 717% same
- 1fc0nfig/ste-writing★ 242% same
- jokot/skills★ 120% same
- LeonardiFranco/skills★ 167% same
- nikolaypavlov/claude-skills★ 018% same
Wrote their own version · 7
- tonkeeper/tonkeeper-web★ 448same name
- ahonn/dotfiles★ 62same name
- berkeley-humanoids/skills★ 4same name
- berkeley-humanoids/Skills★ 4same name
- norton77930/understanding-ai-outputs★ 3same name
- joshua-noel/skills★ 2same name
- HarveyZgit/agents★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- comment-cleanupSkill
- commitSkill
- difit-openSkill
- difit-resolveSkill
- difit-reviewSkill
- refactor-proseSkill
- refine-skillsSkill
- squashSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Use one name for one thing (1.11, 9.4).
- Distinctive: line 26
No marketing adjectives: seamless, robust, powerful, cutting-edge, effortless, world-class, next-generation, revolutionary.
- Distinctive: line 32
Only simple tenses (3.2): infinitive, imperative, simple present, simple past, simple future.
- Distinctive: line 33
No stacked auxiliaries (3.4).
- Distinctive: line 34
Use a verb for an action (3.7): "analyze the log", not "perform an analysis of the log".
- Distinctive: line 36
No phrasal verbs (9.3): spin up, dive into, kick off, roll out.
- Distinctive: line 40
When a condition comes before its command, divide them with a comma (5.4): "If the test fails, read the log."
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not drop words to compress (4.2): "Remove the bolts from the panel", never "Remove bolts from panel".
- Distinctive: line 50
No semicolons (8.1). Write two sentences.
- Distinctive: line 59
Never drop a fact, number, condition, or scope qualifier to satisfy a length cap.
- Distinctive: line 62
If the input already complies, return it unchanged and say so.
- Distinctive: line 63
Write only the requested text.
- Distinctive: line 72
If you can run commands, lint the draft with the script that ships next to this skill:
- Distinctive: line 81
If you cannot run commands, use this checklist:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ste-writing
Write prose in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English (Issue 9: 53 rules in 9 sections, 875 approved words). This applies to documentation, READMEs, pull-request text, error messages, release notes, comments, tool descriptions, system prompts, and agent-to-agent messages. It does not apply to code, identifiers, or command syntax. It is not for marketing copy, essays, or anything that needs a voice — STE strips voice on purpose.
Three ways to use it:
- write — produce new text in STE.
- rewrite — convert existing text to STE. Keep every fact.
- review — do not rewrite. Output a table (
Rule | Original | Simplified), one row per violation, then one line on anything you left alone and why.
Rules
Numbers in parentheses are rule numbers in ASD-STE100 Issue 9.
WORDS
- Use one name for one thing (1.11, 9.4). Do not rotate check / verify / validate / confirm for the same action — pick one and reuse it. Certified STE uses "make sure" or "examine".
- Use the short common word: start (not begin/commence/initiate), use (not utilize/leverage), help (not facilitate), make sure (not ensure/verify), do (not perform/conduct), give or supply (not provide), before (not prior to), after (not subsequent to), about (not regarding/concerning), get (not obtain/acquire), show (not demonstrate), also (not additionally/furthermore/moreover).
- Give each word one meaning (1.3). "fall" means to move down, not to decrease.
- No marketing adjectives: seamless, robust, powerful, cutting-edge, effortless, world-class, next-generation, revolutionary.
- American spelling (1.14).
VERBS
- Active voice. "the parser reads the file", not "the file is read by the parser". Procedures: always. Descriptive text: passive is permitted only when the actor is unknown or irrelevant (3.6).
- A past participle used as an adjective is not passive and is correct (3.3): "the valve is closed", "the field is required".
- Only simple tenses (3.2): infinitive, imperative, simple present, simple past, simple future. No present perfect: "we received the report", never "we have received the report".
- No stacked auxiliaries (3.4). Not "it is important to note that this may help to improve". Write "this improves X".
- Use a verb for an action (3.7): "analyze the log", not "perform an analysis of the log".
- No "-ing" main verb where a simple tense works (3.5).
- No phrasal verbs (9.3): spin up, dive into, kick off, roll out.
SENTENCES
- One instruction per sentence, unless two actions happen at the same time (5.2). Max 20 words (instruction, 5.1), max 25 (descriptive, 6.3).
- When a condition comes before its command, divide them with a comma (5.4): "If the test fails, read the log."
- Do not drop words to compress (4.2): "Remove the bolts from the panel", never "Remove bolts from panel". No contractions.
- When applicable, use an article (a, an, the) or a demonstrative adjective (this, these) before a noun (4.5) — the standard's qualifier included. Do not add articles to general statements or abstract concepts ("Solvents can cause damage to paint"). In a series of items, the article before the first noun is enough.
- Connect related sentences with plain connectors — then, but, thus, as a result (4.4). STE is short sentences, not disconnected ones.
NOUNS
- Multi-word nouns have at most three words (2.1). Unpack "the agent task queue priority handler" into "the handler that sets task-queue priority", or hyphenate.
- Define an abbreviation at first use, then use the abbreviation.
PUNCTUATION
- No semicolons (8.1). Write two sentences. (Note: the em dash is not banned by STE, only the semicolon is — add "no em dash" yourself if you want it gone.)
STRUCTURE
- One topic per paragraph (6.5), max six sentences (6.6). For steps, use a numbered vertical list, one action per item, imperative form. Put a condition before its command.
- A list item can be a label, not a sentence (a flow list, a changelog line, a feature bullet). Keep a label in its short form ("Frontend receives session JWT"). Do not expand a label into a sentence only to give it an article.
- Safety text (strict mode): WARNING = risk of injury, CAUTION = risk of damage, NOTE = information only, never an instruction (7.1, 5.5). Start with the command or condition, then give the risk (7.2, 7.3). Put it directly before the step it protects, not at the top of the procedure.
Guards
- Never drop a fact, number, condition, or scope qualifier to satisfy a length cap. Keep the longer sentence and flag it.
- Preserve code identifiers, part numbers, units, error strings, and safety wording exactly.
- Change the smallest span that fixes a violation. Do not restyle text a rule does not touch.
- If the input already complies, return it unchanged and say so.
- Write only the requested text. No preamble, no summary, no closing remarks.
Modes
- strict — procedures, runbooks, safety text, error messages: apply every rule and both length caps, plus the strict word set: but (not however), because (not since, for causes), can (not may), must (not should/shall), use or with (not using), obey (not follow, for instructions), push (not press, for physical controls). The spec's own list of the 39 most frequent writer errors is in ste-recurring-errors.md.
- STE-flavored — general prose (READMEs, PR descriptions, docs): apply the sentence, paragraph, tense, active-voice, noun-cluster, and no-phrasal-verb discipline; relax the 875-word dictionary lockdown and the strict word set so the text keeps enough range to read naturally.
Verify
If you can run commands, lint the draft with the script that ships next to this skill:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/ste-writing/ste-lint.py draft.md # flavored target: under 2.5 per 100 words
python3 ~/.claude/skills/ste-writing/ste-lint.py --strict draft.md # strict target: under 1.5 per 100 wordsFix the reported categories and lint again — at most two passes. Report the final score with the text. Do not present text as clean without a lint run.
If you cannot run commands, use this checklist:
- Any instruction over 20 words, or any other sentence over 25? Split it.
- Any semicolon? Replace with a period.
- Any contraction? Expand it.
- Any present perfect ("has/have received") or modal stack? Use a simple tense.
- Any passive voice with a known actor? Make it active.
- Any "-ing" main verb, nominalization ("perform an analysis"), or phrasal verb ("spin up")? Replace with a plain verb.
- Any multi-word noun of four or more words? Unpack it.
- Any dropped article ("Remove bolts from panel")? Restore it.
- Same thing named two ways? Pick one name.
- Any label expanded into a sentence only to add an article? Make it a label again.
Scope
The mechanical rules above are lintable and are what removes slop. Full STE also needs human judgment (the right technical noun, whether a sentence "makes good sense") — a checker cannot certify that, and slop is not about that. This skill fixes the FORM of slop. It cannot make a hollow paragraph true.
The full standard is free at https://asd-ste100.org (do not paste it in full; it is copyrighted). This skill is unofficial and not affiliated with ASD. ASD-STE100 is a registered EU trademark (No. 017966390).
Source
From the ste-writing skill by Ege Chelebi (@woosal1337),
published with the video series episode "The Cure for AI Slop":
https://github.com/woosal1337/blog/blob/main/videos/ep01-the-cure-for-ai-slop/ste-writing-skill.md
Synced verbatim on 2026-08-14, except for the lint paths in ## Verify, which
point at the installed skill directory. ste-lint.py and
ste-recurring-errors.md come from the same upstream directory. Check upstream
for newer versions before you edit this file.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

