sc-implement
Skill19 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Feature implementation with intelligent persona activation, task orchestration, and MCP integration. Use when implementing features, APIs, components, services, or coordinating multi-agent development. Triggers on requests for code implementation, feature development, or complex task orchestration.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kreighmitchell/SuperClaudeword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- kreighmitchell/SuperClaude★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-data-engineerSkill
- agent-fullstack-developerSkill
- agent-kubernetes-specialistSkill
- agent-ml-engineerSkill
- agent-performance-engineerSkill
- agent-react-specialistSkill
- agent-security-engineerSkill
- agent-technical-writerSkill
- ask-multiSkill
- askSkill
- learned-skills-indexSkill
- sc-analyzeSkill
- sc-brainstormSkill
- sc-buildSkill
- sc-cicd-setupSkill
- sc-code-reviewSkill
- sc-designSkill
- sc-documentSkill
- sc-e2eSkill
- sc-estimateSkill
- sc-evaluateSkill
- sc-explainSkill
- sc-gitSkill
- sc-improveSkill
- sc-log-fixSkill
- sc-mcpSkill
- sc-pr-checkSkill
- sc-pr-fixSkill
- sc-principlesSkill
- sc-pushSkill
- sc-readmeSkill
- sc-researchSkill
- sc-tddSkill
- sc-testSkill
- sc-workflowSkill
- sc-worktreeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Generate: - Create implementation with framework best practices
- Very specific: line 29
Run KISS validation: python .claude/skills/sc-principles/scripts/validate_kiss.py --scope-root .
- Very specific: line 30
Run Purity validation: python .claude/skills/sc-principles/scripts/validate_purity.py --scope-root .
- Distinctive: line 32
Integrate: - Update docs, provide testing recommendations
- Very specific: line 159
When --loop is enabled, MCP tools are used between iterations:
- Distinctive: line 169
Start in analysis mode; produce scoped plan before touching files
- Distinctive: line 170
Only mark complete when referencing concrete repo changes (filenames + diff hunks)
- Distinctive: line 172
Prefer minimal viable change.
- Distinctive: line 180
Never claim code exists without proof
- Very specific: line 201
When using --loop, this skill integrates with the skill persistence layer for cross-session learning:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implementation Skill
Comprehensive feature implementation with coordinated expertise and systematic development.
Quick Start
# Basic implementation
/sc:implement [feature-description] --type component|api|service|feature
# With framework
/sc:implement dashboard widget --framework react|vue|express
# Complex orchestration
/sc:implement [task] --orchestrate --strategy systematic|agile|enterpriseBehavioral Flow
- Analyze - Examine requirements, detect technology context
- Plan - Choose approach, activate relevant personas
- Generate - Create implementation with framework best practices
- Validate - Apply security, quality, and principles validation
- Run KISS validation:
python .claude/skills/sc-principles/scripts/validate_kiss.py --scope-root . --json - Run Purity validation:
python .claude/skills/sc-principles/scripts/validate_purity.py --scope-root . --json - If blocked: Refactor code to comply before proceeding
- Run KISS validation:
- Integrate - Update docs, provide testing recommendations
Flags
| Flag | Type | Default | Description |
--type | string | feature | component, api, service, feature |
--framework | string | auto | react, vue, express, etc. |
--safe | bool | false | Enable safety constraints |
--with-tests | bool | false | Generate tests alongside code |
--fast-codex | bool | false | Streamlined path, skip multi-persona |
--orchestrate | bool | false | Enable hierarchical task breakdown |
--strategy | string | systematic | systematic, agile, enterprise, parallel, adaptive |
--delegate | bool | false | Enable intelligent delegation |
--principles | bool | true | Enable KISS/Purity validation |
--strict-principles | bool | false | Treat principles warnings as errors |
Personas Activated
- architect - System design, architectural decisions
- frontend - UI/component implementation
- backend - API/service implementation
- security - Security validation, auth concerns
- qa-specialist - Testing, quality assurance
- devops - Infrastructure, deployment
- project-manager - Task coordination (with --orchestrate)
- code-warden - Principles enforcement (KISS, Purity)
MCP Integration
PAL MCP (Always Use for Quality)
| Tool | When to Use | Purpose |
mcp__pal__consensus | Architectural decisions | Multi-model validation before major changes |
mcp__pal__codereview | Code quality | Review implementation quality, security, performance |
mcp__pal__precommit | Before commit | Validate all changes before git commit |
mcp__pal__debug | Implementation issues | Root cause analysis for bugs encountered |
mcp__pal__thinkdeep | Complex features | Multi-stage analysis for complex implementations |
mcp__pal__planner | Large features | Sequential planning for multi-step implementations |
mcp__pal__apilookup | Dependencies | Get current API/SDK documentation |
mcp__pal__challenge | Code review feedback | Critically evaluate review suggestions |
PAL Usage Patterns
# Consensus for architectural decision
mcp__pal__consensus(
models=[
{"model": "gpt-5.2", "stance": "for"},
{"model": "gemini-3-pro", "stance": "against"},
{"model": "deepseek", "stance": "neutral"}
],
step="Evaluate: Should we use Redux or Context API for state management?"
)
# Pre-commit validation
mcp__pal__precommit(
path="/path/to/repo",
step="Validating implementation changes",
findings="Security, performance, completeness checks",
confidence="high"
)
# Code review after implementation
mcp__pal__codereview(
review_type="full",
step="Reviewing new authentication implementation",
findings="Quality, security, performance, architecture",
relevant_files=["/src/auth/login.ts", "/src/auth/middleware.ts"]
)
# Debug implementation issue
mcp__pal__debug(
step="Investigating why API returns 500 on edge case",
hypothesis="Null check missing for optional field",
confidence="medium"
)Rube MCP (Automation & Integration)
| Tool | When to Use | Purpose |
mcp__rube__RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS | External services | Find APIs, SDKs, integrations |
mcp__rube__RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL | CI/CD, notifications | Trigger builds, notify team, update tickets |
mcp__rube__RUBE_REMOTE_WORKBENCH | Code generation | Bulk code operations, transformations |
mcp__rube__RUBE_CREATE_UPDATE_RECIPE | Reusable workflows | Save implementation patterns as recipes |
mcp__rube__RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS | Verify integrations | Ensure external service connections |
Rube Usage Patterns
# Search for integration tools
mcp__rube__RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS(queries=[
{"use_case": "send slack message", "known_fields": "channel_name:dev-updates"},
{"use_case": "create github pull request", "known_fields": "repo:myapp"}
])
# Notify team and update ticket on completion
mcp__rube__RUBE_MULTI_EXECUTE_TOOL(tools=[
{"tool_slug": "SLACK_SEND_MESSAGE", "arguments": {
"channel": "#dev-updates",
"text": "Feature implemented: User authentication flow"
}},
{"tool_slug": "JIRA_UPDATE_ISSUE", "arguments": {
"issue_key": "PROJ-123",
"status": "In Review"
}},
{"tool_slug": "GITHUB_CREATE_PULL_REQUEST", "arguments": {
"repo": "myapp",
"title": "feat: Add user authentication",
"base": "main",
"head": "feature/auth"
}}
])
# Save implementation workflow as recipe
mcp__rube__RUBE_CREATE_UPDATE_RECIPE(
name="Feature Implementation Workflow",
description="Standard flow for implementing features with notifications",
workflow_code="..."
)MCP-Powered Loop Mode
When --loop is enabled, MCP tools are used between iterations:
- Iteration N - Implement feature
- PAL codereview - Assess quality (target: 70+ score)
- PAL debug - Investigate any issues found
- Iteration N+1 - Apply improvements
- PAL precommit - Final validation before marking complete
Guardrails
- Start in analysis mode; produce scoped plan before touching files
- Only mark complete when referencing concrete repo changes (filenames + diff hunks)
- Return plan + next actions if tooling unavailable
- Prefer minimal viable change; skip speculative scaffolding
- Escalate to security persona before modifying auth/secrets/permissions
Evidence Requirements
This skill requires evidence. You MUST:
- Show actual file diffs or code changes
- Reference test results or lint output
- Never claim code exists without proof
Examples
React Component
/sc:implement user profile component --type component --framework reactAPI with Tests
/sc:implement user auth API --type api --safe --with-testsComplex Orchestration
/sc:implement "enterprise auth system" --orchestrate --strategy systematic --delegateLoop Mode & Learning
When using --loop, this skill integrates with the skill persistence layer for cross-session learning:
How Learning Works
- Feedback Recording - Each iteration's quality scores and improvements are persisted
- Skill Extraction - Successful patterns are extracted when quality threshold is met
- Skill Retrieval - Relevant learned skills are injected into subsequent tasks
- Effectiveness Tracking - Applied skills are tracked for success rate
Loop Flags
| Flag | Type | Default | Description |
--loop | int | 3 | Enable iterative improvement (max 5) |
--learn | bool | true | Enable learning from this session |
--auto-promote | bool | false | Auto-promote high-quality skills |
Example with Learning
# Iterative implementation with learning
/sc:implement auth flow --loop 3 --learn
# View learned skills
python scripts/skill_learn.py '{"command": "stats"}'
# Retrieve relevant skills
python scripts/skill_learn.py '{"command": "retrieve", "task": "auth"}'Learned Skills Location
Promoted skills are stored in:
.claude/skills/learned/
├── SKILL.md # Index
├── learned-backend-auth/ # Example promoted skill
│ ├── SKILL.md
│ └── metadata.jsonResources
- scripts/select_agent.py - Agent selection logic
- scripts/evidence_gate.py - Evidence validation
- scripts/skill_learn.py - Skill learning management
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

