agentleFS
Thirumalai-Tech-DeveloperThirumalai-Tech-Developer/Kratos_Agent/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md

security-audit

Skill1 starsChanged 47 days agoMITView on GitHub

Review code for exploitable security weaknesses with scoped threat analysis, traceable evidence, and confidence-rated findings.

192 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-stories

    Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    story-done

    End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +7 more from lilangMax
  • +1 more from nicepkg

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 173 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use for an explicitly requested security review or when a change touches authentication, authorization, untrusted input, secrets, network …

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Trace behavior: Follow input through validation, authorization, processing, storage, and output.

    line 12

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 173 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Security audit

Use for an explicitly requested security review or when a change touches authentication, authorization, untrusted input, secrets, network exposure, persistence, or privileged actions.

  1. Set scope: Identify the target paths, entry points, trust boundaries, sensitive assets, and attacker-controlled inputs. State what is outside the review.
  2. Trace behavior: Follow input through validation, authorization, processing, storage, and output. Check dependency and configuration boundaries where they affect the path.
  3. Verify candidates: For every suspected issue, cite the exact code path and explain a plausible attacker action and concrete impact. Reject style concerns and unproven possibilities.
  4. Report findings first: Give severity, confidence, affected location, preconditions, and a concise remediation. Separate confirmed findings from questions or hardening suggestions.
  5. Check the fix: Re-read the changed path and its callers. Run scanners or tests only when available and requested; name tools that were not run.

Never print credential values, exploit a live third-party target, or claim a clean bill of health from a partial review. Follow the relevant project policy and permission checks. Trail of Bits tooling can be selected when its applicable MCP tools or local utilities are actually available.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.