agentleFS
TheMattBermanTheMattBerman/loop-kit/skills/loop-start/SKILL.md

loop-start

Skill9 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

The plain-language front door for getting AI to do a recurring job for you, with zero jargon and no setup knowledge required. Use when a non-technical person asks: "I want AI to do X for me", "help me automate X", "get AI to handle X every day", "set up AI to do X for me", "can AI do X so I do not have to?", or "I do not know what a loop is but I want Y to happen on its own." Default starting point for any beginner who describes a goal in everyday words. Do NOT use when the user already speaks in design terms and wants to spec or map a loop ("design a loop for X", "turn this workflow into a loop") -- route that to loop-builder. Do NOT use when the user wants to audit, critique, or triage an existing loop ("is this loop safe?", "audit this spec") -- route that to loop-doctor.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. TheKREATORS/my-claude-skills★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask this before anything else, then default to quick:

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask at most two plain safety follow-ups, and ONLY when the answer is missing:

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask one plain question at a time, teaching briefly after each answer:

    line 50
  4. Distinctive:

    If the gate does not pass, or a danger flag fires, do NOT show the user a raw verdict label.

    line 107
  5. Distinctive:

    When the job is clear and clears the gate, produce the actual runnable result through the loop-builder design flow, then narrate it back to …

    line 128

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Loop Start

A loop is just AI doing a job for you on repeat, without you holding its hand each time.

You do not need to know any of the inside words. Describe the job in plain English and this skill sets it up safely, explaining everything as it goes.

First, Offer the Depth Choice

Ask this before anything else, then default to quick:

Want the quick version (I ask only what I need), or want me to walk you through it
and explain as we go?

Quick Path (default)

  1. Take the user's goal exactly as they said it.
  2. Ask at most two plain safety follow-ups, and ONLY when the answer is missing:
    • "For one run, what would finished look like to you?"
    • "Should it ever send, post, publish, delete, or spend anything without asking you first?"
  3. Deliver the beginner output (see below). Keep it short.

Guided Path (deep)

Ask one plain question at a time, teaching briefly after each answer:

  1. What is the job you want done?
  2. How often should it happen?
  3. Where does it get its information?
  4. What does finished look like for one run?
  5. What is it never allowed to do without checking with you first?

Then deliver the beginner output, and only here you may also show the spec if asked.

Under the Hood (never shown to the user)

Classify the job:

python3 shared/scripts/loop_onboard.py "<the user's goal in their own words>"

Gate an assembled job before promising it will run:

python3 shared/scripts/validate_spec.py spec.md
python3 shared/scripts/checkpoint_run.py preflight --spec spec.md

Translate every result into plain words BEFORE showing anything. Use shared/scripts/plain_language.py (the plainify function) as the single source of truth for wording. Never show the user any inside code or label: no risk codes, no maturity codes, no inside job-type names, and no raw verdict labels. If you are about to type one of those, run it through plain language first.

Beginner Output Contract

Give this back in plain words (no spec block unless the user chose the deep path and asks for it):

  1. Here is what your loop will do. One line, plain.
  2. On its own vs always checks with you. Two short lists: what it handles by itself, and what it always runs past you first.
  3. The runnable thing. Either a copy-paste prompt they can drop into Claude or Codex, or a single command to run.
  4. Try it once like this, and watch for X. One concrete first run plus the one thing to keep an eye on.

Include this sentence exactly when the job is ready for a first supervised pass:

I will run the first version safely, with checkpoints.

Then either create the first-run packet with checkpoint_run.py init and run only local/read-only supported steps in the current session, or ask only for the specific missing source, access, judgment, approval, or verification input. Ask no more than three questions.

Safety Trust Layer

If the gate does not pass, or a danger flag fires, do NOT show the user a raw verdict label. Explain plainly why this job is safer with a person in the driver's seat, then offer the safer version.

Common plain-language saves:

  • It is not yet clear what finished means, so pin that down together first.
  • It could send, post, publish, delete, or spend, so make it draft and wait for your approval instead of acting on its own.
  • It could pile up more for you to review than you can keep up with, so cap how much it does per run.

The default safe rewrite is almost always: have it prepare the work and wait for your yes, rather than act on its own.

External actions always stay behind approval. Sending, posting, publishing, deploying, merging, deleting, spending, billing, or customer-facing updates require an approval artifact before the first run can proceed.

Hand-Off

When the job is clear and clears the gate, produce the actual runnable result through the loop-builder design flow, then narrate it back to the user in plain words using the beginner output contract above. The user only ever sees the plain version.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.