general
Skill137 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Package shaped context — plans, decisions, project state — into a structured document for handoff to another AI agent, your future self, or a coworker. Mode: $ARGUMENTS Parse the first word to determine mode: - "list" — Show all existing handoffs - "update [slug]" — Append new context to an existing handoff - "view [slug]" — Read and summarize an existing handoff - Anything else (or empty) — Create a new handoff (remaining args = description) Silently gather this context…
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lecluse-net/galaristheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- fulopkovacs/fuko-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- TobyChain/skill-nettheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
- TobyChain/ultra-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
- br3eze-code/br3eze-codetheir own version, first seen Jul 8, 2026
- timothy-pham/copilot-suitetheir own version, first seen Mar 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use coding.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillcoding
Change code in a repository safely - explore, plan, edit, verify.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- 0xranx/golembot★ 326same name
- br3eze-code/br3eze-code★ 3same name
- TobyChain/skill-net★ 2same name
- TobyChain/ultra-skills★ 2same name
- jcsaaddupuy/badrobots★ 1same name
- lecluse-net/galaris★ 1same name
- fulopkovacs/fuko-skills★ 0same name
- timothy-pham/copilot-suite★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Do NOT display or summarize what you gathered.
- Very specific: line 35
If plan file(s) were found in .claude/plans/, use them as primary context.
- Distinctive: line 36
If NO plan files found, ask: "I don't see an active plan file.
- Distinctive: line 40
Ask these two questions (together, not sequentially):
- Very specific: line 49
If the user provided a description in the arguments (e.g., /handoff auth system migration), use that as the handoff title/topic.
- Distinctive: line 53
Use the appropriate template based on audience.
- Very specific: line 57
Create the .handoffs/ directory if it doesn't exist.
- Distinctive: line 59
After saving, confirm the file path and show a brief summary of what was captured.
- Distinctive: line 65
Use when the audience is another AI agent or Claude Code session.
- Distinctive: line 138
Use when the user is creating a handoff for themselves to pick up later.
- Distinctive: line 198
Use when the audience is a human coworker.
- Very specific: line 252
Read all files in .handoffs/ and display them as a table:
- Very specific: line 260
If no .handoffs/ directory or no files exist, say: "No handoffs found in this repo.
- Distinctive: line 273
Should the status change?
- Distinctive: line 286
After saving, confirm what was added.
- Distinctive: line 296
Read the full file and present a conversational summary:
- Distinctive: line 303
Keep it brief — the user can read the full file if they want details.
- Distinctive: line 310
Create another handoff for a different audience (e.g., "Want an AI agent version too?")
- Distinctive: line 319
Create a new one
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Handoff
Package shaped context — plans, decisions, project state — into a structured document for handoff to another AI agent, your future self, or a coworker.
Input
Mode: $ARGUMENTS
Parse the first word to determine mode:
- "list" — Show all existing handoffs
- "update [slug]" — Append new context to an existing handoff
- "view [slug]" — Read and summarize an existing handoff
- Anything else (or empty) — Create a new handoff (remaining args = description)
Before Starting (Auto-Gather)
Silently gather this context before asking any questions:
- Plan files — Read all
.claude/plans/*.mdfiles. These are the primary context source. - Project instructions — Read
CLAUDE.mdorclaude.mdin the repo root (if it exists). - Git state — Run
git log --oneline -20,git status, andgit diff --stat. - Directory structure — Run
lsat the repo root. - Existing handoffs — Read the list of files in
.handoffs/(if the directory exists).
Do NOT display or summarize what you gathered. Just hold it as context.
Mode: Create (Default)
Step 1: Determine context source
- If plan file(s) were found in
.claude/plans/, use them as primary context. Tell the user: "I found a plan in.claude/plans/— I'll use that as the basis for this handoff." - If NO plan files found, ask: "I don't see an active plan file. Can you describe the project state and what needs to happen next?"
Step 2: Ask focused questions
Ask these two questions (together, not sequentially):
- "Who is this handoff for?"
- AI agent (another Claude Code session, Janet, OpenClaw, etc.)
- Myself later (picking this up tomorrow/next week)
- A coworker (human who needs context)
- "Anything to add beyond what's in the plan?" — gotchas, failed approaches, environment setup notes, constraints for the receiving agent, things that aren't in the plan but matter.
If the user provided a description in the arguments (e.g., /handoff auth system migration), use that as the handoff title/topic. Still ask the two questions above.
Step 3: Generate the handoff
Use the appropriate template based on audience. Generate a slug from the description or plan title (2-4 words, lowercase, hyphenated).
Save to: .handoffs/YYYY-MM-DD-[slug].md
Create the .handoffs/ directory if it doesn't exist.
After saving, confirm the file path and show a brief summary of what was captured.
Template: AI Agent
Use when the audience is another AI agent or Claude Code session. Optimize for an agent to pick up and start working immediately with zero additional context needed.
# Handoff: [Title]
**Created:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Author:** [user or "Claude Code session"]
**For:** AI Agent
**Status:** Ready to execute
---
## Summary
[2-3 sentences: what this project/task is, current state, what needs to happen next. An agent reading only this section should understand the mission.]
## Project Context
[What the project is. Tech stack. Architecture notes. Repo structure highlights. Only what's needed to orient — not a full tour.]
## The Plan
[The shaped plan from .claude/plans/ — include the full plan content here. This is the core of the handoff. If no plan file existed, include whatever plan/approach was described by the user.]
## Key Files
| File | Why It Matters |
|------|---------------|
| [path] | [brief reason] |
[Only files that are directly relevant. Not every file in the repo.]
## Current State
**Done:**
- [Completed items]
**In Progress:**
- [Partially done items with notes on where they stand]
**Not Started:**
- [Items that haven't been touched]
## Decisions Made
[Decisions that were made during planning/implementation. Include the reasoning so the agent doesn't re-litigate them.]
- **[Decision]** — [Why. What was considered and rejected.]
## Important Context
[Gotchas, failed approaches, environment notes, things that aren't obvious from the code.]
- [Item]
## Next Steps
[Priority-ordered. Each step should be specific enough for an agent to execute without guessing.]
1. **[Step]** — [Acceptance criteria or definition of done]
2. **[Step]** — [Acceptance criteria or definition of done]
## Constraints
[Rules the receiving agent must follow. Files not to touch. Patterns to maintain. Performance requirements. Security considerations.]
- [Constraint]Template: Self/Later
Use when the user is creating a handoff for themselves to pick up later. Optimize for fast context recovery — "where was I and what was I thinking?"
# Handoff: [Title]
**Created:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** Paused — pick up from here
---
## Where I Left Off
[Specific breadcrumbs. "I was in the middle of..." / "The last thing I did was..." / "I stopped because..."]
## The Plan
[The shaped plan. Full content from .claude/plans/ or user description.]
## What's Working
- [Verified/done items — things that are solid and don't need revisiting]
## What's Not Working Yet
- [Bugs, failing tests, half-done implementations. Be specific about symptoms.]
## My Current Thinking
[The approach being taken. Hypotheses. What I was about to try. Mental model of the problem.]
## Decisions I've Made
[So I don't re-litigate them next time.]
- **[Decision]** — [Why]
## Things I Tried That Didn't Work
[Save future-me the time of going down these paths again.]
- **[Approach]** — [Why it didn't work]
## Next Time I Pick This Up
[Ordered list of what to do first when resuming.]
1. [First thing]
2. [Second thing]
## Open Questions
[Unresolved items. Things I need to figure out. Unknowns.]
- [Question]Template: Coworker
Use when the audience is a human coworker. Optimize for readability — assume they have no context on this work.
# Handoff: [Title]
**Created:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Author:** [name]
**Status:** [Handing off / Pausing / FYI]
---
## TL;DR
[3-4 sentences max. What is this, what state is it in, what needs to happen.]
## Background
[Why this work exists. Business context. What problem it solves.]
## The Plan
[What's been planned. High-level approach.]
## What's Done
- [Completed items]
## What's Left
- [Remaining items with rough effort estimates if useful]
## Key Decisions
[Decisions made and why — so they aren't revisited without reason.]
- **[Decision]** — [Rationale]
## Things to Watch Out For
[Gotchas, fragile areas, known issues, technical debt.]
- [Item]
## Where to Get Help
[Who to ask. Relevant docs. Slack channels. Related PRs.]
- [Resource]Mode: List
Read all files in .handoffs/ and display them as a table:
| Date | Slug | For | Status | Summary |For each file, read just the frontmatter (first ~10 lines) to extract date, audience, and status. Show the first sentence of the Summary section.
If no .handoffs/ directory or no files exist, say: "No handoffs found in this repo. Run /handoff to create one."
Mode: Update
Parse the slug from arguments (everything after "update").
Find the matching file in .handoffs/. Match on slug (the part after the date). If no exact match, list available handoffs and ask which one.
Ask:
- What's changed since the last handoff?
- Any new decisions, blockers, or completed items?
- Should the status change?
Append to the file — add an update section at the bottom. Never overwrite existing content.
---
## Update — YYYY-MM-DD
[New context, decisions, progress, blockers. Written in the same style as the original template.]After saving, confirm what was added.
Mode: View
Parse the slug from arguments (everything after "view").
Find the matching file in .handoffs/. If no exact match, list available handoffs and ask which one.
Read the full file and present a conversational summary:
- What this handoff is about
- Who it's for
- Current status
- Key next steps
- Any updates that have been appended
Keep it brief — the user can read the full file if they want details.
After Delivering
For create mode, offer to:
- Create another handoff for a different audience (e.g., "Want an AI agent version too?")
- Review and adjust the handoff before sharing
For update mode, offer to:
- Continue updating
- View the full handoff
For list mode, offer to:
- View a specific handoff
- Create a new one
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

