graphify
Skill2 starsChanged 6 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Build and query a repository knowledge graph for architecture and dependency questions. Use when the user asks how something connects, where something is implemented, or any question that would otherwise require reading many files.
115 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ever-works/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rylsherdamz-rgb/stellar-forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- brebuilds/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GstMirabal/Token-Optimized-Agent-Pipelinetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use remotion-maps, remotion-saas and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillremotion-maps
Remotion Map animation knowledge
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillremotion-saas
Build an app with Remotion
Also in 4 projects that use this
royaluniondesign-sysSkilldeployment-patterns
Deployment workflows, CI/CD pipeline patterns, Docker containerization, health checks, rollback strategies, and production readiness checklists for web applications.
Also in 4 projects that use this
mstuder-slalomSkilldjango-verification
Verification loop for Django projects: migrations, linting, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness checks before release or PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ttmouseSkillprompt-master
提示词主控 - 智能选择合适的领域skill并生成提示词,支持自动领域分类和调度
Also in 4 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkilldoubt-driven-development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions115 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 115
- safishamsi/graphify★ 144ksame name
- Graphify-Labs/graphify★ 144ksame name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- nandyalu/trailarr★ 486same name
- bdfinst/agentic-dev-team★ 302same name
- cin12211/orca-q★ 225same name
- sammcj/agentic-coding★ 169same name
- EBISPOT/ols4★ 106same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
105 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adopt-evalSkill
- contract-validationSkill
- create-prSkill
- designSkill
- helm-upgradeSkill
- ingest-readingSkill
- investigate-alertSkill
- k8s-debugSkill
- parallax-reviewSkill
- shiny-engineerSkill
- stakeholder-commsSkill
- stop-slop-codeSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- upstream-triageSkill
- verify-claimsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 113 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 45
Use results to select the smallest set of files to actually read.
- Distinctive: line 49
Read the user's question.
- Very specific: line 50
If graphify-out/graph.json exists, query it.
- Distinctive: line 52
Read those files (not the entire directory).
- Very specific: line 65
Never publish a real private-repo graph or GRAPH_REPORT.md.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 113 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Graphify
Turn any folder of code, docs, papers, or images into a queryable knowledge graph. Querying a graph typically costs ~70x fewer tokens than file-by-file reading.
Upstream: https://github.com/safishamsi/graphify
When to use
- Architecture questions: "How does X connect to Y?"
- Dependency tracing: "Which charts reference this Service?"
- God-node detection: "Which file has the most incoming edges?"
- Migration planning: "What breaks if I rename this CRD?"
Build a graph
cd <repo>
graphify . --no-vizOutput lands in graphify-out/. The harness .gitignore excludes this directory — never commit a real private-repo graph.
Inspect the build report for god nodes and surprising connections:
cat graphify-out/GRAPH_REPORT.mdQuery
graphify query "How does deployment config flow to workloads?"
graphify path "HelmChart" "ArgoCDApplication"
graphify explain "ServiceAccount"Use results to select the smallest set of files to actually read. The graph guides exploration; source files remain the final authority.
Pattern: graphify-first, source-of-truth-second
- Read the user's question.
- If
graphify-out/graph.jsonexists, query it. - From the result set, pick the 3–10 most relevant files.
- Read those files (not the entire directory).
- Answer with citations to the actual files — not to graph nodes.
When to rebuild
- Significant repo restructuring.
- New chart / module added.
- Renames of frequently referenced symbols.
Otherwise, the existing graph is usually good enough for weeks.
Safety
- Never publish a real private-repo graph or
GRAPH_REPORT.md. - For public examples, use a sanitized sample graph or commit only
graphify-out/.gitkeep.
Memory
bd remember "graphify build for <repo>: <god nodes / community summary>" --key <repo>/tool/graphifyDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

