agentleFS
TermherdTermherd/termherd/.claude/skills/file-issue/SKILL.md

file-issue

Skill2 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

File a termherd GitHub issue completely — English body, native issue type, area labels, and the board fields Horizon, Effort and Class or Severity — then check it took with just board-check. Use when asked to open, file or report an issue or bug for termherd, or when a session finds a defect worth tracking.

14 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use review-pr.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • DockerSkill

    review-pr

    Review one or more incoming Docker documentation pull requests as a maintainer. Independently validate technical claims, assess editorial fit and information architecture, choose a verdict, and draft exact inline or PR-wide feedback behind a confirmation gate. Use for requests such as "review PR 123", "is this PR correct?", "does this information belong here?", "validate this PR", or "help review backlog PRs". Do not use to maintain or fix a PR you own; use maintain-pr for that.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

File an issue

Filing is half done until the issue is classified on the board; an unclassified issue appears in no prioritised view. Board ids are in docs/agents/tooling.md (Filing an issue on the board).

  1. Body, in English. Observed, expected, steps to reproduce; a guess is labelled as one. No AI signature. Write it with the Write tool to a file under the scratchpad and pass --body-file <absolute path>: $TMPDIR differs inside and outside the sandbox.
  2. Create with gh issue create --title … --body-file … --label area:… outside the sandbox (gh fails TLS inside it).
  3. Type. Fetch the type ids, never guess them, then set the type with updateIssue(input: {id, issueTypeId}). A guessed id answers cannot be found, which reads as a missing type.
  4. Board fields. The auto-add puts the issue on the board; fill Horizon, Effort, and Class (Feature) or Severity (Bug) — a Task carries neither. A security bug is 🟡 Minor at most. One literal gh project item-edit per field; a worktree session refuses loops and variables, and GraphQL with inline braces (pass -F query=@file).
  5. Check with just board-check outside the sandbox: inside it the recipe reports unchecked (exit 2), which is not clean.
  6. Link. A scoped epic's issue is cited in its .roadmap/features/ file, and the file in the issue.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.